Determination of the factors associated with antigen-specific CD4+ T-cell responses to BNT162b2 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Understanding interpatient variation in CD4+T-cell responses is the bases for understanding the pathogenesis and management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in a cohort of patients with RA and determined factors associated with the responses. METHODS: Four hundred and thirty-one patients with RA having received two doses of BNT162b2, a messenger RNA-based vaccine for SARS-CoV-2, were included. Vaccine antigen-specific IgG was detected by ELISA, and antigen-specific CD4+T cells were detected by CD154 expression in response to antigenic stimulation. Expression of cytokines was concomitantly detected by intracellular staining. Associations among background variables, antigen-specific antibody production and the CD4+T-cell responses were analysed. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed based on the profiles of antigen-specific cytokine production by CD4+T cells to stratify patients with RA. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis indicated that ageing negatively affects CD4+T-cell response as well as antibody production. No association was detected between the presence or the levels of rheumatoid factor/anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and anti-vaccine immune responses. Methotrexate and prednisolone reduced B cell but not T-cell responses. Conventional immunophenotyping by the expression of chemokine receptors was not associated with the actual CD4+T-cell response, except for T helper cells (Th1). Functional immunophenotyping based on the profiles of antigen-specific cytokine production of CD4+T cells stratified patients with RA into three clusters, among which Th1-dominant type less frequently underwent joint surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and immunological variables that are associated with antigen-specific CD4 T-cell responses in patients with RA were determined by analysing immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Mechanism of decrease in the atrial potential after implantation of a single-lead VDD pacemaker: atrial histological changes after implantation of a VDD pacemaker lead in dogs.

The single-lead VDD pacemaker system (VDDPS) enables atrial synchronous ventricular pacing with only one lead in patients with an atrioventricular block. There are some cases in which the atrial potential decreases after implantation of a VDDPS, making physiological pacing difficult. The mechanism of this decrease has not been elucidated yet. To elucidate the possible relationship between the decrease of the atrial potential after implantation of a VDDPS and histopathological changes of the atrium. We implanted a VDDPS from the jugular vein under anesthesia in 10 adult dogs. The tip of the pacing lead was fixed in the right ventricular apex of the heart under fluoroscopic guidance. Then, the lead was ligated and fixed to the jugular vein at a point where a favorable atrial potential was obtained. The end of the lead was passed from the neck to the back subcutaneously; then pulled outside and fixed there to measure the atrial potential. The atrial potential was measured using a pacing system analyzer under anesthesia on days 3 (n = 9) and 7 (n = 8), as well as on weeks 2 (n = 6), 3 (n = 4), and 4 (n = 3), after the implantation. The heart was removed from the dogs on day 3 (n = 2), day 7 (n = 2), week 2 (n = 2), and week 4 (n = 4) to examine the atrial histological findings. The atrial potential was 2.7 +/- 0.7 mV at the time of the implantation, 1.7 +/- 1.1 mV (P < 0.05) on day 3, and 1.7 +/- 0.7 mV on week 4 after the implantation. Macroscopically, the pacemaker lead was covered with thrombus, and adhered to the atrial wall in 80% of animals. Microscopically, the endocardium was hypertrophic due to fibrous tissue; besides RBC extravasation, inflammatory cells infiltration and degeneration of myocardial cells, were observed under the endocardium. Inflammatory changes developed in the atrial wall after implantation of the VDDPS, and this seemed to be one of the mechanisms for the decrease of the atrial potential of the VDDPS.