Key clinical considerations for demonstrating the utility of preclinical models to predict clinical drug-induced torsades de pointes.

While the QT/QTc interval is currently the best available clinical surrogate for the development of drug-induced torsades de pointes, it is overall an imperfect biomarker. In addition to low specificity for predicting arrhythmias, other issues relevant to using QT as a biomarker include (1) an apparent dissociation, for some drugs (for example, amiodarone, sodium pentobarbital, ranolazine) between QT/QTc interval prolongation and TdP risk, (2) Lack of clarity regarding what determines the relationship between QTc prolongation and TdP risk for an individual drug, (3) QT measurement issues, including effects of heart rate and autonomic perturbations, (4) the significant circadian changes to the QT/QTc interval and (5) concerns that the development, regulatory and commercial implications of finding even a mild QT prolongation effect during clinical development has significant impact the pharmaceutical discovery pipeline. These issues would be significantly reduced, clinical development simplified and marketing approval for some drugs might be accelerated if there were a battery of preclinical tests that could reliably predict a drug's propensity to cause TdP in humans, even in the presence of QTc interval prolongation. This approach is challenging and for it to be acceptable to pharmaceutical developers, the scientific community and regulators, it would need to be scientifically well validated. A very high-negative predictive value demonstrated in a wide range of drugs with different ionic effects would be critical. This manuscript explores the issues surrounding the use of QT as a clinical biomarker and potential approaches for validating preclinical assays for this purpose against clinical data sets.

Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe coadministered with statins: randomised, placebo-controlled, blinded experience in 2382 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.

We assessed pooled safety and lipid-regulating efficacy data from four similarly designed trials of ezetimibe coadministered with statins in 2382 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Patients were randomised to one of the following double-blind treatments for 12 weeks: placebo; ezetimibe 10 mg; statin; or statin + ezetimibe. Statin doses tested were 10, 20, 40 mg/day (atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin or lovastatin) or 80 mg/day (atorvastatin, simvastatin). Treatment with ezetimibe + statin led to significantly greater reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol, triglycerides, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apolipoprotein B and increases in HDL-C, compared to statin alone. At each statin dose, treatment with ezetimibe + statin led to a greater LDL-C reduction compared to the next highest statin monotherapy dose. Ezetimibe + statin had a safety profile similar to statin monotherapy. Coadministration of ezetimibe + statin offers a well-tolerated, highly efficacious new treatment strategy for patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Long-term safety and tolerability profile of ezetimibe and atorvastatin coadministration therapy in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia.

Long-term safety and tolerability of ezetimibe plus atorvastatin (EZE + ATV) coadministration therapy were compared to those of ATV monotherapy in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia. Upon completion of a 12 week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing EZE 10 mg; ATV 10, 20, 40 or 80 mg; EZE + ATV 10, 20, 40 or 80 mg or placebo, 246 patients were enrolled in a 12-month extension, with reassignment to double-blind EZE 10 mg (n = 201) or matching placebo (n = 45) coadministered daily with open-label ATV 10 mg. At intervals of 6 weeks, patients not at National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel II LDL-C goals were titrated to the next higher ATV dose. Safety evaluations included adverse event (AE) reports and laboratory test results. EZE + ATV and ATV monotherapy groups were similar with regard to incidence of all AEs (71 vs. 67%), treatment-related AEs (22 vs. 27%) and discontinuations due to AEs (9 vs. 7%) or treatment-related AEs (6 vs. 7%), respectively. Neither clinically significant elevations in hepatic transaminases or creatine kinase nor any cases of myopathy or rhabdomyolysis were observed in either group during the extension study. After 6 weeks, EZE + ATV 10mg produced greater reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; -53 vs. -37%), total cholesterol (TC; -38.8 vs. -26.0%) and triglycerides (TG; -28 vs. -12%) and similar increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (4.6 vs. 4.5%) compared to ATV 10 mg, respectively, and these changes were maintained and significant at 1 year (p < 0.01 for LDL-C, TC and TG). More EZE + ATV patients achieved LDL-C goal than ATV patients at study endpoint (91 vs. 78%, respectively; p = 0.02). Thus, the coadministration of EZE + ATV for 12 months was well tolerated and more efficacious than ATV monotherapy.

Placement of a defibrillation lead in the left subclavian vein from the right cephalic vein.

This case report highlights the feasibility and stability of transvenous placement of a second defibrillation lead in the left subclavian vein from a right cephalic vein approach. This was undertaken in a right-sided implant of an active can cardioverter defibrillator to lower defibrillation thresholds that would have otherwise precluded implant.

New advances in class III antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

In the past 2 years, significant advances have been made in class III antiarrhythmic drug therapy. In patients with ventricular arrhythmias and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), antiarrhythmic agents are increasingly being used as adjunct therapy to decrease the frequency of ICD discharges. Sotalol was recently shown to be effective in reducing tachyarrhythmias in patients with ICDs. Intravenous amiodarone is being used for the acute treatment of unstable ventricular arrhythmia and is being investigated for the treatment of acute out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Class III agents are increasingly being used for prophylaxis in patients who have atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, and data point to an important role for these agents in reducing supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after cardiac surgery. Future studies will need to directly compare these agents with pure anti-adrenergic maneuvers in postoperative patients. In addition to terminating atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, ibutilide significantly reduces human atrial defibrillation thresholds and increases the percentage of patients who can be cardioverted from atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. The US Food and Drug Administration is expected to approve dofetilide for clinical use soon, and it is currently reviewing azimilide (which seems to be devoid of frequency-dependent effects on repolarization) for prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Dronedarone, tedisamal, and trecetilide are now under active study intended to determine their usefulness in patients with cardiac arrhythmias. Experimental studies are ongoing to identify pharmacologic agents that will selectively prolong repolarization in the atria without exerting electrophysiologic effects in the ventricles.

New advances in class III antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

During the past 10 years there has been a major shift in antiarrhythmic drug development from class I to class III antiarrhythmic agents. The first two class III antiarrhythmic drugs that became available, sotalol and amiodarone, also have potent antiadrenergic actions. Newer antiarrhythmic drugs either block a specific ionic current (e.g., dofetilide-induced blockade of the rapidly activating component of the delayed rectifier potassium current) or block multiple ionic channels (e.g., ibutilide and azimilide) in order to prolong atrial and ventricular action potentials without other specific pharmacologic effects. Recent data suggest that these new class III antiarrhythmic drugs are highly effective for treating patients with rhythm disorders with an acceptable degree of proarrhythmia. This manuscript reviews the newer class III agents' effectiveness in treating atrial and ventricular arrhythmias and the recent studies examining drug-induced prolongation of atrial repolarization to prevent or terminate postoperative atrial fibrillation.

Modulation of antiarrhythmic drug effects by beta-adrenergic sympathetic stimulation.

Appreciation has grown for the impact of the autonomic nervous system on the development of clinical cardiac arrhythmias. Antiarrhythmic medications work to significantly prolong cardiac repolarization and slow conduction. The question has arisen whether these pharmacologic actions of antiarrhythmic drugs can be modulated by alterations in the sympathetic nervous system. This article examines the data pertaining to modulation of the class I and class III effects of antiarrhythmic drugs during beta-adrenergic stimulation, the body's natural response to stress. The actions of several antiarrhythmic drugs can be fully reversed during beta-adrenergic sympathetic stimulation. Overall, the data suggest that pure class III drugs are the most susceptible to reversal of their effects on refractoriness, followed by class IA agents, amiodarone (which has partial resistance), and d,l-sotalol (which is highly resistant to reversal). Whereas retrospective analyses of a number of trials suggest that sympathetic-stimulation-induced reversal of the electrophysiologic effects of certain antiarrhythmic drugs can decrease their clinical efficacy, prospective trials examining this issue are needed. At the current time it appears reasonable to administer beta blockers to patients receiving antiarrhythmic agents that do not have intrinsic antiadrenergic effects.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) after myocardial infarction often have multiple morphologies of inducible VT, which complicates mapping and is viewed by some as a relative contraindication to ablation. Attempting to identify and target a single "clinical" VT is often limited by inability to obtain 12-lead ECGs of VTs that are terminated emergently or by defibrillators. This study assesses the feasibility of ablation in patients selected without regard to the presence of multiple VTs by targeting all VTs that allow mapping. METHODS AND RESULTS: Radiofrequency catheter ablation targeting all inducible monomorphic VTs that allowed mapping was performed in 52 patients with prior myocardial infarction. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy had failed in 41 (79%) patients including amiodarone in 36 (69%) patients. An average of 3.6+/-2 morphologies of VT were induced per patient. More than 1 ablation session was required in 16 (31%) patients. Complications occurred in 5 (10%) patients, including 1 (2%) death caused by acute myocardial infarction. During follow-up 59% of patients continued to receive amiodarone; 23 (45%) had implantable defibrillators. During a mean follow-up of 18+/-15 months (range 0 to 51 months) 1 patient died suddenly, 2 died from uncontrollable VT, and 5 died from heart failure. Three-year survival rate was 70+/-10%, and rate for risk of VT recurrence was 33+/-7%. CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency catheter ablation controls VT that is sufficiently stable to allow mapping in 67% of patients despite failure of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and multiple inducible VTs. However, ablation was largely adjunctive to amiodarone and defibrillators in this referral population.

Atrial fibrillation: antiarrhythmic therapy versus rate control with antithrombotic therapy.

Atrial fibrillation is a major health problem in the United States, but the best strategies for treating it have not been rigorously determined in clinical studies. Specifically, there is a paucity of data comparing the approach of maintaining sinus rhythm using prophylactic antiarrhythmic drug therapy with the approach of controlling the ventricular response to atrial fibrillation while reducing embolic events with concomitant antithrombotic therapy. Until ongoing randomized trials are completed, which patients benefit most from a specific approach cannot be determined with certainty. In general, the most reasonable strategies include (1) the restoration of sinus rhythm (without prophylactic antiarrhythmic therapy) after the patient's first episode of atrial fibrillation; and (2) the maintenance of sinus rhythm (including the use of prophylactic antiarrhythmic therapy) in patients who remain symptomatic despite adequate rate control, and who are not at high risk for proarrhythmia and/or are unlikely to maintain sinus rhythm. The risks and benefits need to be carefully weighed in patients with truly asymptomatic atrial fibrillation. Many patients may require multiple attempts to maintain sinus rhythm. Current investigative treatment modalities (e.g., ablation techniques, atrial implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, new antiarrhythmic agents) are likely to alter the current approaches to atrial fibrillation.

Exploring postinfarction reentrant ventricular tachycardia with entrainment mapping.

Ventricular tachycardia late after myocardial infarction is usually due to reentry in the infarct region. These reentry circuits can be large, complex and difficult to define, impeding study in the electrophysiology laboratory and making catheter ablation difficult. Pacing through the electrodes of the mapping catheter provides a new approach to mapping. When pacing stimuli capture the effects on the tachycardia depend on the location of the pacing site relative to the reentry circuit. The effects observed allow identification of various portions of the reentry circuit, without the need for locating the entire circuit. Isthmuses where relatively small lesions produced by radiofrequency catheter ablation can interrupt reentry can often be identified. A classification that divides reentry circuits into one or more functional components helps to conceptualize the reentry circuit and predicts the likelihood that heating with radiofrequency current will terminate tachycardia. These methods are helping to define human reentry circuits.

Efficacy of intravenous ibutilide for rapid termination of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a dose-response study.

OBJECTIVES: Currently available antiarrhythmic drugs have limited efficacy for short-term, rapid termination of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. BACKGROUND: Ibutilide fumarate is an investigational class III antiarrhythmic agent that prolongs repolarization by increasing the slow inward sodium current and by blocking the delayed rectifier current. It can be administered intravenously and has a rapid onset of electrophysiologic effects. METHODS: The efficacy and safety of ibutilide were studied in 200 patients with atrial flutter > 3 h in duration or atrial fibrillation 3 h to 90 days in duration. Patients were randomized to receive a single intravenous dose of placebo or an infusion of ibutilide fumarate at 0.005, 0.010, 0.015 or 0.025 mg/kg body weight over 10 min. Conversion was defined as termination of the atrial arrhythmia during or within 60 min after infusion. Forty-one patients received placebo and 159 received ibutilide (0.005 mg/kg [n = 41], 0.010 mg/kg [n = 40], 0.015 mg/kg [n = 38] or 0.025 mg/kg [n = 40]). RESULTS: The arrhythmia terminated in 34% of drug-treated patients. The rates of successful arrhythmia termination were 3% for placebo and 12%, 33%, 45% and 46%, respectively, for 0.005-, 0.010-, 0.015- and 0.025-mg/kg ibutilide. The placebo and 0.005-mg/kg ibutilide groups had lower success rates than all other dose groups (p < 0.05). The mean time to termination of the arrhythmia was 19 min (range 3 to 70) from the start of infusion. Successful arrhythmia termination was not affected by enlarged left atrial diameter, decreased ejection fraction, presence of valvular heart disease or the use of concomitant medications (beta-adrenergic blocking agents, calcium channel blocking agents or digoxin). Arrhythmia termination was not predicted by the magnitude of corrected QT interval prolongation but was associated with a shorter duration of atrial arrhythmia. The most frequent adverse events in ibutilide-treated patients were sustained and nonsustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (3.6%). All patients with sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia were successfully treated with direct current cardioversion and had no recurrence. The occurrence of proarrhythmia did not correlate with ibutilide plasma concentration. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that ibutilide is able to rapidly terminate atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.

Frequency-dependent electrophysiologic effects of d,l-sotalol and quinidine and modulation by beta-adrenergic stimulation.

INTRODUCTION: Frequency-dependent electrophysiologic actions of oral quinidine and oral sotalol may be clinically important, but these properties and their modulation by beta-adrenergic sympathetic stimulation have not been determined. METHODS AND RESULTS: The frequency-dependent effects of oral quinidine (n = 17) and oral d,l-sotalol (n = 17) were determined at: (1) drug-free baseline; (2) during steady-state drug dosing; and (3) during isoproterenol infusion to patients receiving quinidine or d,l-sotalol. The monophasic APD90 and RVERP were prolonged 12% to 17% (P < 0.001) during pharmacologic therapy, and frequency-dependent effects were only observed for the RVERP during sotalol. In both drug groups, isoproterenol significantly reduced the sinus cycle length and reduced the RVERP to a greater extent at longer than at shorter paced cycle lengths. While isoproterenol fully reversed quinidine's effects on the APD90 and RVERP, sotalol-induced APD90 prolongation was reduced by only 2% to 4%, and the RVERP was unaffected. Isoproterenol attenuated the frequency-dependent effects of quinidine on QRS duration by a relatively fixed amount of 7% to 10%. Isoproterenol fully reversed quinidine-induced, but did not affect sotalol-induced prolongation in the sustained VT cycle length. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Over the range of examined cycle lengths, oral quinidine and d,l-sotalol did not exert frequency-dependent effects on ventricular repolarization. (2) Isoproterenol fully reversed quinidine's effects on refractoriness, repolarization, and prolongation of VT cycle length, whereas d,l-sotalol's effects were largely preserved, despite significant reductions in sinus cycle length. (3) These results suggest that beta-blockade is important in preventing reversal of antiarrhythmic drug effects by augmented sympathetic nervous system tone.

Relation of pace mapping QRS configuration and conduction delay to ventricular tachycardia reentry circuits in human infarct scars.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the relation of the paced QRS configuration and conduction delay during pace mapping to reentry circuit sites in patients with ventricular tachycardia late after myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: The QRS configuration produced by ventricular pacing during sinus rhythm (pace mapping) can locate focal idiopathic ventricular tachycardias during catheter mapping, but postinfarction reentry circuits may be relatively large and contain regions of slow conduction. We hypothesized that for postinfarction ventricular tachycardia, 1) pacing during sinus rhythm at reentry circuit sites distant from the exit from the scar would produce a QRS configuration different from the tachycardia; and 2) a stimulus to QRS delay during pace mapping may be a useful guide to reentry circuit slow conduction zones. METHODS: Catheter mapping and ablation were performed in 18 consecutive patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. At 85 endocardial sites in 13 patients, 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) were recorded during pace mapping, and participation of each site in a reentry circuit was then evaluated by entrainment techniques during induced ventricular tachycardia or by application of radiofrequency current. RESULTS: Pace maps resembled tachycardia at < 30% of likely reentry circuit sites identified by entrainment criteria and at only 1 (9%) of 11 sites where radiofrequency current terminated tachycardia. Analysis of the stimulus to QRS interval during entrainment with concealed fusion showed that the conduction time from the pacing site to the exit from the scar was longer at sites where the pace map did not resemble tachycardia. Evidence of slow conduction during pace mapping, with a stimulus to QRS interval > 40 ms was observed at > or = 70% of reentry circuit sites. CONCLUSIONS: At many sites in postinfarction ventricular reentry circuits, the QRS configuration during pace mapping does not resemble the ventricular tachycardia QRS complex, consistent with relatively large reentry circuits or regions of functional conduction block during ventricular tachycardia. A stimulus to QRS delay during pace mapping is consistent with slow conduction and may aid in targeting endocardial sites for further evaluation during tachycardia.

Long-term efficacy of amiodarone for the maintenance of normal sinus rhythm in patients with refractory atrial fibrillation or flutter.

The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of amiodarone to maintain sinus rhythm in patients with refractory atrial fibrillation or flutter. One hundred ten patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter, refractory to > or = 1 class I antiarrhythmic agents (mean +/- SD 2.5 +/- 1.5, median 2), were given low-dose amiodarone (mean maintenance dose 268 +/- 100 mg/day) to determine its efficacy to maintain normal sinus rhythm after chemical or electrical cardioversion. Fifty-three patients had chronic and 57 patients had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or flutter. Mean age of the study population was 60 +/- 13 years, and the mean follow-up was 36 +/- 38 months (range 31 days to 137 months). Actuarial rates for maintenance of sinus rhythm were 0.87, 0.70, and 0.55 at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Twenty-one patients (19%) with arrhythmia recurrence had an increase in amiodarone dose, and after a mean additional follow-up of 2.5 years, 86% remained in normal sinus rhythm. The only observed predictor of atrial fibrillation or flutter recurrence was paroxysmal arrhythmia (40% recurrence vs 9% in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation or flutter; p < 0.001). Actuarial rates for withdrawal because of adverse effects were 0.08, 0.22, and 0.30 at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The most frequent adverse effects necessitating withdrawal were skin discoloration (4.5%), pulmonary fibrosis (3.6%; none fatal), and thyroid toxicity (2.7%). No deaths occurred during the study period. In conclusion, amiodarone sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter, with a relatively low incidence of adverse effects necessitating withdrawal.

Entrainment techniques for mapping atrial and ventricular tachycardias.

Many atrial tachycardias, atrial flutter, and postmyocardial infarction ventricular tachycardias are due to reentry through large "macroreentrant" circuits. These circuits can be difficult to define by catheter mapping of the activation sequence. Entrainment techniques allow the relation of a mapping site to the reentrant circuit to be assessed on a site-by-site basis during catheter mapping. Regions of abnormal conduction that are in the reentrant circuit can be distinguished from bystander sites outside the circuit. A mapping site classification to guide catheter ablation is reviewed.

The effects of beta-adrenergic stimulation on the frequency-dependent electrophysiologic actions of amiodarone and sematilide in humans.

BACKGROUND: The autonomic nervous system appears to play an important role in the development of clinical ventricular arrhythmias, and beta-adrenergic sympathetic stimulation may be important in modulating the electrophysiologic effects of class III antiarrhythmic agents. This study prospectively determined the effects of isoproterenol on the frequency-dependent actions of sematilide (a pure class III agent that selectively blocks the delayed rectifier potassium current) and amiodarone (a class III agent with a complex pharmacologic profile) on ventricular repolarization, refractoriness, and conduction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The frequency-dependent electrophysiologic effects of sematilide (n = 11) and amiodarone (n = 22) were determined at (1) drug-free baseline, (2) during steady-state (> 48 hours) dosing with sematilide (455 +/- 5 mg/d [mean +/- SEM]) or after 10.5 days of amiodarone loading (1618 +/- 32 mg/d), and (3) during isoproterenol administration (35 ng/kg per minute) to patients receiving sematilide or amiodarone. Electrophysiologic determinations were made at paced cycle lengths of 300 to 500 ms. The two groups were similar in all clinical characteristics. The ventricular action potential duration at 90% repolarization (APD90) was significantly prolonged by sematilide (mean increase, 7 +/- 1%, P < .01 by ANOVA) and amiodarone (mean increase, 12 +/- 1%, P < .001). However, while sematilide-induced APD90 prolongation was fully reversed to baseline values during isoproterenol infusion, the APD90 in patients receiving amiodarone remained significantly prolonged by a mean of 6 +/- 1% compared with baseline (P = .005). The reduction in the APD90 was frequency dependent for both agents, with a greater reduction at longer than shorter paced cycle lengths (P < .02). During isoproterenol infusion the right ventricular effective refractory period (RVERP) in patients receiving sematilide was significantly reduced to mean values of 8 +/- 2% below baseline (P < .05), whereas the RVERP in patients receiving amiodarone remained significantly prolonged by a mean of 7 +/- 1% above baseline values (P = .01). Sematilide and sematilide/isoproterenol had no effect on ventricular conduction. Amiodarone increased the QRS duration by 14 +/- 4% (paced cycle length, 500 ms) to 32 +/- 5% (paced cycle length, 300 ms) compared with baseline values. Isoproterenol attenuated amiodarone-induced QRS prolongation by a mean of 5 +/- 1% (P = .005), without frequency-dependent effects, consistent with isoproterenol-induced increases in the sodium current. During isoproterenol infusion there was a trend for the sustained VT cycle length to be reduced below baseline in patients receiving sematilide (275 +/- 16 versus 298 +/- 55 ms, P = .06), whereas it remained significantly prolonged compared with baseline in patients receiving amiodarone (327 +/- 17 versus 257 +/- 12 ms, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Isoproterenol fully reversed the effects of selective potassium channel block with sematilide on the APD90 and further reduced the RVERP to values significantly below baseline; it partially attenuated but did not fully reverse amiodarone-induced prolongation of the APD90 and RVERP, which remained significantly prolonged beyond baseline values. Isoproterenol exerted frequency-dependent effects in both patient groups on the APD90; it modestly attenuated amiodarone-induced conduction slowing without frequency-dependent actions; and the sustained VT cycle length remained significantly prolonged during isoproterenol administration to patients receiving amiodarone but not in those receiving sematilide. These findings may have important clinical implications regarding protection from arrhythmia development in patients receiving pure class III agents or amiodarone.

Antiarrhythmic effects of selective prolongation of refractoriness. Electrophysiologic actions of sematilide HCl in humans.

BACKGROUND: Recent data have suggested that antiarrhythmic agents that act largely by delaying conduction may not be as effective in controlling ventricular arrhythmias as those that prolong repolarization. Recently, numerous "pure" class III agents have been developed. METHODS AND RESULTS: The antiarrhythmic and electrophysiologic profiles of sematilide, a "pure" class III agent, were determined in 27 patients with clinical ventricular arrhythmias and inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia during electrophysiologic study. After treatment with oral sematilide (mean dose, 133 +/- 29 mg every 8 hours), the patients underwent repeat 24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring and electrophysiologic study. The baseline sinus cycle length and QT, QTc, JT, and JTc intervals were significantly increased 8 to 17% by sematilide (P = .001 to .029). There were no changes in the PR or QRS intervals. Sematilide (at a paced cycle length of 600 ms) significantly increased the atrial effective refractory period (238 +/- 32 to 264 +/- 32 ms; 11 +/- 16% increase from baseline; P = .013), atrioventricular nodal effective refractory period (296 +/- 74 to 354 +/- 71 ms; 20 +/- 19%; P = .029), and right ventricular effective refractory period (252 +/- 25 to 281 +/- 30 ms; 12 +/- 8%; P < .001) but did not significantly change the PA or HV intervals, the corrected sinus node recovery time, or the Wenckebach cycle length. Determination of the frequency-dependent effects of sematilide (n = 10) on the right ventricular monophasic action potential duration (APD90) during ventricular pacing at cycle lengths of 600 to 300 ms revealed that the APD90 was significantly prolonged by sematilide during ventricular pacing at 600 to 350 ms (APD90 increase of 40 +/- 17, 27 +/- 21, 18 +/- 18, and 14 +/- 15 ms, respectively) but not at 300 ms (APD increase of 13 +/- 19 ms). Sematilide significantly prolonged the APD90 to a greater degree at longer than at shorter cycle lengths (P = .02). The ventricular effective refractory period had a similar reverse frequency-dependent relation as the APD90. Sematilide had no effect on the ventricular effective refractory period-to-APD90 ratio or on ventricular conduction. Sematilide suppressed the induction of sustained ventricular tachycardia in 41% of all patients exposed to sematilide. Prolongation of ventricular refractoriness was correlated with ventricular tachycardia suppression. The right ventricular effective refractory period (at 600 ms) increased by 38 +/- 14 ms in patients whose sustained ventricular tachycardia was suppressed by sematilide and by 19 +/- 18 ms in patients not suppressed (P = .015). One patient developed short runs of pause-dependent nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Eight patients were placed on long-term sematilide therapy, and during a mean follow-up period of 7.0 +/- 7.5 months, two patients developed sudden cardiac death, and one additional patient had recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia. CONCLUSIONS: The electrophysiologic profile of sematilide is consistent with selective block of outward potassium currents and associated isolated lengthening of the ventricular effective refractory period and APD; sematilide demonstrates a significant degree of reverse frequency-dependence of the ventricular APD and effective refractory period; and suppression of ventricular tachycardia inducibility by sematilide appears to be correlated with increases in the right ventricular effective refractory period.

Frequency-dependent electrophysiologic effects of amiodarone in humans.

BACKGROUND: In general, antiarrhythmic agents that prolong the action potential duration (APD) have attenuated effects on repolarization at short cycle lengths (reverse frequency dependence), and this may limit their efficacy for controlling ventricular arrhythmias. The frequency-dependent effects of amiodarone on repolarization may differ from those of other antiarrhythmic agents and have not been determined in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS: The frequency-dependent effects of amiodarone on repolarization and conduction were determined during electrophysiologic study in 19 patients at drug-free baseline and after 11 days of amiodarone loading (1621 +/- 162 mg/d, group A) and in 15 additional patients after > or = 1 year of chronic amiodarone therapy (380 +/- 56 mg/d, group B). The two groups were similar in all clinical characteristics. The ventricular APD at 90% repolarization (APD90), right ventricular effective refractory period (VERP), and QRS duration were determined at paced cycle lengths of 300 to 600 milliseconds. In group A, amiodarone significantly (10% to 13%, P < .001) increased the APD90 at all paced cycle lengths by approximately 30 milliseconds compared with baseline. Similarly, there were no frequency-dependent effects on the percent increase in VERP. However, there was greater amiodarone-induced prolongation of the VERP magnitude at longer paced cycle lengths than at shorter cycle lengths (P = .04), although the VERP remained significantly prolonged at the shortest paced cycle length (300 milliseconds) by 33 +/- 22 milliseconds (16.9% increase from baseline, P < .001). Amiodarone significantly (P < .01) increased the QRS duration at paced cycle lengths < or = 500 milliseconds by a maximum of 28% compared with baseline measurements. The increase in ventricular conduction time was frequency dependent (P < .01), consistent with significant sodium channel blockade. The VERP/APD90 ratio (determined at twice diastolic threshold) was significantly prolonged by amiodarone (as compared with baseline) at cycle lengths > or = 400 milliseconds, indicative of both time- and voltage-dependent effects on refractoriness. The increase in induced sustained ventricular tachycardia cycle length in group A patients after amiodarone loading was significantly correlated with the increase in VERP (r = .68, P = .044) but not with increases in QRS duration or APD90. In addition, there were no significant differences in frequency-dependent effects of amiodarone between groups A and B. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency-dependent response of the electrophysiologic effects of amiodarone are similar after 11 days of loading or > or = 1 year of chronic therapy. Amiodarone does not exert frequency-dependent effects on ventricular repolarization; it prolongs refractoriness by both time- and voltage-dependent mechanisms and exerts frequency-dependent effects on ventricular conduction. The absence of amiodarone-induced reverse frequency-dependent effects on repolarization, together with its time-dependent effects on refractoriness may account in part for the high efficacy of the drug and its low propensity to cause torsade de pointes.