Water quality benefits of weather-based manure application timing and manure placement strategies.

The timing of manure application and placement of manure significantly affects manure nutrient use efficiency and the amount of nutrient lost from a field. Application of manure prior to a minimal precipitation period, and manure application through incorporation, reduces risks associated with nutrient loss through surface runoff. The current study aims to explore potential water quality impacts related to manure application strategies on the timing of application and approach (surface broadcasting or incorporation). The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was used to represent manure application scenarios and quantify potential water quality impacts in Susquehanna River Basin located in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States. A baseline (business-as-usual) scenario was developed with manure application based on crop planting date and manure storage availability, and surface broadcasting as the application approach. The baseline was compared with a strategically timed manure application considering weather forecasting and manure incorporation. The strategic, weather-based manure application approach reduced TN and TP loading at the outlet by 4% and 6%, respectively. Manure incorporation simulations considering low-disturbance injection showed significant reduction of about 19% for TN and 44% for TP at the watershed outlet. Winter closure of manure application could reduce organic nutrient loss. Winter application of manure in 21% of row cropped areas (2% of whole watershed area) increased organic N and P loading by 10% and 4%, respectively, at watershed outlet.

Evaluating water quality benefits of manureshed management in the Susquehanna River Basin.

Manureshed management guides the sustainable use of manure resources by matching areas of crop demand (nutrient sinks) with areas generating livestock manure (nutrient sources). A better understanding of the impacts of manureshed management on water quality within sensitive watersheds is needed. We quantified the potential water quality benefits of manureshed-oriented management through scenario-based analyses in the Susquehanna River Basin (SRB) using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool. Five manureshed management scenarios were developed and compared with a baseline "business-as-usual" scenario. The baseline assumes manure is less transportable, which means some locations have manure application in excess of crop demand. The "watershed nutrient balance" scenarios assume excess manure from surplus locations is transportable and that manure is applied around the SRB based on crop nutrient demand. The "watershed nutrient balance avoiding runoff prone areas" scenarios assume manure is transportable but not applied in vulnerable landscapes of the SRB. Each scenario was evaluated under two application rates considering crop nitrogen demand (N-based) and phosphorus demand (P-based). Phosphorus-based manureshed management was more effective in water quality improvements than N-based management. Phosphorus-based nutrient balance scenarios simulated 3 and 25% reduction in total N (TN) and total P (TP), respectively, from the baseline scenario at the watershed outlet. The N- and P-based scenarios avoiding runoff prone areas simulated 3 and 6% reduction in TN loss and 4 and 25.2% reduction in TP loss, respectively, from the baseline. Overall, the manureshed management scenarios were more effective in improving the quality of local streams in livestock-intensive regions than at the watershed outlet.