Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma: prognostic value of circumferential resection margin and stratification of N1 category.

BACKGROUND: In the UK, it is standard practice to treat esophageal adenocarcinoma with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (no radiation) and surgery. We examined the prognostic value of the status of the circumferential resection margin (CRM) and stratification of the N1 category into 1-4 nodes or > or = 5 nodes. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2006, 105 patients with radiologically staged T3, T4 or N1 esophageal adenocarcinoma had preoperative chemotherapy. One hundred and one patients had an Ivor Lewis operation with two-field lymphadenectomy, three had a transhiatal operation and one had a three-incision operation. CRM was assessed by painting the specimen with India ink and transverse sections at 5-10 mm intervals. The CRM was considered positive (CRM+) if malignant cells were within 1 mm of the inked margin. RESULTS: There were 87 men. The median age was 61 years (range 37-81 years). Median lymph node yield was 28 (4-77); 86 patients (83%) had > or = 18 nodes. Seventy-four patients (70%) had N1 disease, with 1-4 involved nodes in 41 patients (39%) and > or = 5 nodes in 33 patients (31%). The CRM was positive in 38 patients (36%). On multivariate analysis, nodal metastasis [N0 versus N1; hazard ratio (HR) 3.3, 3-year survival 80% versus 40%; P = 0.004], CRM status (CRM- versus CRM+: HR 2.6, 3-year survival 64% versus 26%; P = 0.002) and vascular invasion (V0 versus V1: HR 2.2, 3-year survival 67% versus 39%; P = 0.014) retained independently significant prognostic value. N1 patients with 1-4 nodes had longer survival than those with > or = 5 nodes (56% versus 21%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CRM involvement and stratification of the N1 category are independent prognostic factors after multimodal therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Comparison of oncological outcomes after laparoscopic transhiatal and open esophagectomy for T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: This study compared pathological characteristics and patterns of disease recurrence for patients with pT1 esophageal adenocarcinoma treated with either laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy or open esophagectomy. METHODS: From January 2000-December 2006, 44 patients had pT1 esophageal adenocarcinoma after esophagectomy. No patients had neoadjuvant treatment. Twenty-four patients had an Ivor Lewis operation, 4 had an open transhiatal and 16 had a laparoscopic transhiatal operation. RESULTS: There were 37 men. The median age was 64 years (range 35-80 years). Median lymph node yield was 19 (10-51) after an Ivor Lewis operation, 16 (3-28) after an open transhiatal operation and 15 (4-41) after a laparoscopic transhiatal operation. There were two in-hospital deaths (5%), both following open Ivor Lewis operation. All patients in the laparoscopic group had N0 disease; none received adjuvant treatment. Two patients (7%) in the open group had N1 disease, of whom one patient received adjuvant chemotherapy. Eleven patients had submucosal invasion. Alive patients had median follow-up of 36 months (range 5-87 months). One patient in the laparoscopic group had recurrence at 22 months. This patient had poorly differentiated N0 disease which was limited to the mucosa and died at 24 months. Two patients in the open group developed recurrence, at 6 months (N0 disease with submucosal invasion) and 8 months (N1 disease with submucosal invasion) and died at 7 and 14 months, respectively. Both patients had poorly differentiated tumours. The second patient with N1 disease is alive and well at 14 months. Estimated survival (Kaplan-Meier) at 3 years was 93%. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with open transthoracic esophagectomy, there is no oncological detriment in the treatment of pT1 esophageal adenocarcinoma by laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy. The incidence of recurrence is small (7%) but can occur even in patients with tumour limited to the mucosa or N0 disease.