Incidence of early radiolucent lines after glenoid component insertion for total shoulder arthroplasty: a radiographic study comparing pressurized and unpressurized cementing techniques.

BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is commonly performed for arthritic conditions of the shoulder. The outcome after TSA is generally good, but there are several modes of failure, with one of the more common reasons being glenoid loosening. One possible cause for glenoid loosening is inadequate cementation technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of lucent lines on the first postoperative radiograph using 2 different cementation techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients had a pegged glenoid placed with 1 of 2 different cementation techniques. In 26 consecutive patients, the pegged glenoid component was cemented with a traditional minimal manual pressurization technique, whereas 74 underwent a contemporary 3-step pressurization cementation technique before implant insertion. The first postoperative radiograph was evaluated using the system of Lazarus et al, looking at the frequency of lucent lines. The radiographs were deidentified and were randomized and evaluated by 2 independent observers on 3 separate occasions. RESULTS: The Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant differences between grades of radiolucent lines for pressurized versus unpressurized cementation techniques. There were significantly (P < .05) fewer lucent lines identified in the group that underwent contemporary 3-step pressurization as opposed to the group that underwent minimal manual pressurization. Intraobserver reliability and interobserver reliability with Cronbach α coefficients were good. CONCLUSION: The 3-step pressurized cementation technique resulted in a low incidence of radiolucent lines around the glenoid implant in patients undergoing TSA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Prospective Cohort, Treatment Study.

Hook of hamate pull test.

Hook of hamate fractures are often missed despite a distinct history. The purpose of this report was to describe a specific physical examination test that is diagnostic for a hook of hamate fracture, the hook of hamate pull test. It is highly sensitive and was positive in a consecutive series of 5 patients treated for a hook of hamate fracture. These patients also had a distinctive history of playing racket- or club-type sports and presented with longstanding wrist or palm pain.

Treatment of heterotopic ossification of the elbow following burn injury: recommendations for surgical excision and perioperative prophylaxis using radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is reported to occur in 0.1-3.3% of elbows after a severe burn, and can significantly limit elbow motion and upper extremity function. METHODS: The study included 9 patients (11 elbows) treated by the senior author (TW). The surgical technique consisted of making multiple small surgical approaches to remove heterotopic ossification (without raising cutaneous flaps) and concomitantly releasing the elbow capsule and skin contracture. Perioperative radiation therapy was performed to decrease heterotopic ossification recurrence. Outcome measures included postoperative elbow range of motion and Mayo Elbow Performance Score. RESULTS: The average amount of body surface area burned was 54% (range, 10-86%) and mean time from injury to elbow surgery was 416 days (range, 175-860). All elbows had some degree of direct involvement with the thermal injury. Preoperative arc of motion averaged 39° in flexion/extension and 78° in supination/pronation. Four elbows had complete ankylosis in the flexion/extension plane and 1 had only 5° of motion. At last follow-up, arc of motion in flexion/extension averaged 116° and 139° in supination/pronation, an improvement of 77° and 61°, respectively. One recurrence of HO required re-excision. CONCLUSION: We recommend this multiple-approach surgical technique for treatment of heterotopic ossification and elbow contracture after burn injury, along with perioperative radiation therapy to decrease recurrence. Our surgical approach and treatment resulted in significant gains in elbow motion and upper extremity function with few complications.

Anteromedial elbow arthroscopy portals in patients with prior ulnar nerve transposition or subluxation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to document management strategies and complications relating to the use of anteromedial portals for elbow arthroscopy in a series of patients with subluxating or previously transposed ulnar nerves. METHODS: A review of 913 elbow arthroscopies showed that 59 elbows with a subluxating or previously transposed ulnar nerve required anterior compartment arthroscopic surgery. The patients with subluxating nerves had proximal anteromedial portals established by reducing and holding the nerve behind the epicondyle with a thumb while establishing or entering the portal. In cases of prior nerve transposition, the following techniques were used if, by palpation, localization of the ulnar nerve was considered to be (1) unequivocal, (2) equivocal, or (3) impossible: In group 1 (unequivocal) the proximal anteromedial portal was established in the normal antegrade fashion. In group 2 (equivocal) a 1-cm incision was made at the planned proximal anteromedial portal site and blunt dissection down to the capsule was performed without identification of the nerve. In group 3 (impossible) a 2- to 4-cm skin incision was made and the nerve was identified before placement of the portal. RESULTS: We found that 59 elbows in 56 patients had a subluxating ulnar nerve (31 elbows) or previous ulnar nerve transposition (28 elbows). The transposition had been subcutaneous in 21 and submuscular in 7. The proximal anteromedial portal was used in all but 3 cases (2 patients) of submuscular transposition that were early in the series. In those cases only 2 lateral portals were used for anterior compartment surgery. There were no operative ulnar nerve injuries related to the use of the proximal anteromedial portal. CONCLUSIONS: Neither elbow arthroscopy nor specifically the use of the proximal anteromedial portal is contraindicated in patients with prior transposition or subluxation of the ulnar nerve. The management of the nerve can be based on the degree of certainty with which the nerve can be localized by palpation in the region of the planned portal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Arthroscopic release of the stiff elbow.

Treatment of the stiff elbow by arthroscopic capsular release is a relatively new and effective procedure. The surgery is technically demanding and is not indicated in all cases of stiff elbow. Although neurologic complications are unusual, they can be severe and permanent. Neurologic structures at particular risk are the posterior interosseous and ulnar nerves. Rehabilitation is as important as the surgical procedure itself. Arthroscopic capsular release is particularly effective in elbows with minor flexion contractures (less than 30 degrees) and might have some advantages over an open procedure for these minor contractures.

Proximal ulna fractures.

Proximal ulna fractures are relatively common. They range in severity from a simple transverse olecranon fracture to a highly complex fracture dislocation involving a comminuted coronoid process. The anatomy, fracture pathology, treatment approach, and rehabilitation are presented in this article.

Chronic glenohumeral dislocation.

The evaluation and management of chronic glenohumeral dislocations can be challenging. By definition, chronic glenohumeral dislocations represent injuries that were not identified at the time of injury. Therefore, the primary goal is to avoid circumstances in which these injuries are not recognized. This includes undertaking a comprehensive clinical evaluation as well as appropriate imaging studies to understand the pathoanatomic changes-specifically, the humeral head impression fracture and any associated glenoid changes. The size of the impression fracture and duration of the dislocation are important factors in determining the appropriate treatment approach. Satisfactory outcomes can be achieved by using a variety of techniques, including open reduction combined with tendon transfers, allograft reconstruction, disimpaction and bone grafting and prosthetic replacement. Equally important, however, is recognizing patients in whom successful outcomes can be achieved with nonsurgical management.

Core decompression for nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the humeral head: a technique article.

Core decompression may used in the management of early stage, precollapse nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the humeral head. We propose a technique without risk of complications associated with injury to the biceps tendon or the blood supply to the humeral head.

Arthroscopic revision of Bankart repair.

The success of revision surgery for failed Bankart repair is not well known. This purpose of this study was to report the success rates achieved using arthroscopic techniques to revise failed Bankart repairs. Twelve arthroscopic revision Bankart repairs were performed on patients with recurrent unidirectional shoulder instability after open or arthroscopic Bankart repair. Follow-up was available on 11 of the 12 patients at a mean of 34.4 months (range, 25-56 months). The surgical findings, possible modes of failure, shoulder scores (Rowe score, University of California Los Angeles [UCLA], Simple Shoulder Test), and clinical outcome were evaluated. Various modes of failure were recognized during revision arthroscopic Bankart repairs. Good-to-excellent results were obtained in 8 patients (73%) undergoing revision stabilization according to Rowe and UCLA scoring. A subluxation or dislocation event occurred in 3 (27%) of the 11 patients at a mean of 8.7 months (range, 6-12 months) postoperatively. Arthroscopic revision Bankart repairs are technically challenging procedures but can be used to achieve stable, pain-free, functional shoulders with return to prior sport. Owing to limited follow-up and the small number of patients in this study, we were unable to conclude any pattern of failure or selection criteria for this procedure.

Computer-assisted localization of osteoid osteoma: an initial experience.

This article evaluates our initial experience with computer-assisted localization of osteoid osteoma. Nine patients with osteoid osteoma underwent minimally invasive computer-assisted surgery. Patients were followed prospectively for symptomatic relief and complications for an average of 31 months. Successful localization of osteoid osteoma occurred in 7 of 9 patients. Mean operative time was 88 minutes, and mean time to discharge was 1 day (range: same day to 2 days). No fractures, infections, or neurovascular complications occurred. Minimally invasive computer-assisted surgical excision of osteoid osteoma is a safe and feasible option for the surgical localization of osteoid osteoma. It is especially attractive for lesions located in poorly accessible anatomic sites.

Fixation of greater tuberosity fractures: a biomechanical comparison of three techniques.

The fixation of displaced greater tuberosity fractures with 5-0 Fiberwire, Fiberwire tape, and 5-0 Ethibond sutures was compared in 12 pairs of cadaveric humeri. A simulated fracture was created and fixed with suture in a figure-of-eight pattern. The tuberosity was cyclically loaded and its displacement measured. There was no statistical difference in fixation stability between the three suture types.

Loose bodies in a sublabral recess: diagnosis and treatment.

A case of a 26-year-old male with symptoms resulting from loose bodies residing in a sublabral recess is presented. Operative intervention using the standard arthroscopic portals in addition to an accessory posterior portal was successful in removing the loose bodies and approximating the edges of the sublabral foramen. The shoulder is a complex region made up of numerous anatomic structures, which if damaged may be responsible for a patient's pathology. Normal anatomic variations also exist, which in certain situations, may contribute to a patient's presentation. One example of a normal anatomic variation is the sublabral foramen, which represents an unattached anterosuperior labrum.