Functional outcomes in single stage bilateral ACL reconstruction with a maximum follow up of 10 years.

Background: Bilateral ACL injuries are a rarity and there is no particular consensus on whether this rare problem has to be tackled in stages or in a single stage. There are a few studies and case reports in the literature about the outcomes in single staged bilateral Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This study is focused on functional outcomes after a single staged bilateral ACLR, as well as impact of simultaneity of the injury, meniscal tears, notch stenosis and hyperlaxity. Materials and methods: A retrospective study was conducted from 2013 to 2021. Patients with bilateral ACL injury either simultaneous or non simultaneous, with or without meniscal tears were included in this study. Pre operative diagnosis was made both clinically and by MR imaging. All patients underwent a single staged bilateral ACL reconstruction. Pre operative functional scores (IKDC and Lysholm) were taken at admission and patients were examined at regular follow ups. Final functional scores were collected in a phone interview. Results: 33 patients underwent bilateral ACLR in a single stage during the study period but one patient had revision ACLR in one knee and so was excluded. Of the 32 patients, 25 (78%) had non simultaneous injury and 7 (22%) had a simultaneous injury, meniscus tear was noted in 27 (84.4%), notch stenosis in 19 (59.3%) and hyperlaxity in 12 (37.5%). IKDC and Lysholm scores have improved postoperatively. No statistically significant difference was found with or without simultaneous injury or meniscus tears. Conclusion: Single stage bilateral ACL reconstruction is a safe, reproducible approach to bilateral ACL injuries whether they were simultaneous or non simultaneous or with or without meniscal tears.

The Modified PROMT Score: A Better Prognosticative Tool to Assess Traumatic Meniscal Tear Reparability.

Background: Considering various factors that influence meniscal repairability, Ortho One PROMT score (OPS) was proposed in 2019. With an increased understanding of factors influencing meniscal repair and by analysis of OPS predictions and repair results, a modified PROMT score (MPS) has been formulated. The objective of this study is to assess the superiority of MPS over OPS. Methods: Age, chronicity, and pattern of tears were found to be important contributors to false-negative results of OPS. Considering these factors, MPS was designed. A prospective, double-blinded study was conducted between November 2020 and May 2021. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of both scores were calculated. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted. Results: Of 133 meniscal tears, 100 met the inclusion criteria. In predicting meniscal repairability, OPS demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 90.32% and 83.33% medially and 64.71% and 79.41% laterally. MPS had sensitivity and specificity of 96.77% and 88.89% medially and 82.35% and 88.24% laterally. Both scores showed good statistical significance (p < 0.05) in predicting meniscal reparability. For medial meniscus repairability, area under the ROC curve was 0.868 for OPS and 0.928 for MPS. For lateral repairability, the area under the curve was 0.721 for OPS and 0.853 for MPS. Conclusion: MPS will serve as a simple and more effective tool for surgeons to predict meniscal repairability, thus enhancing their pre-surgical preparedness. This tool will also help surgeons to realistically counsel their patients and to achieve optimal patient.

Interlinked Hamstrings for Combined Anterolateral and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Novel Technique for ALL.

Background: Anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction provides rotational stability in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of patients who underwent combined ACL and ALL reconstruction with a novel anatomic technique using hamstring tendon autograft and fixed loop suspensory device. Methods: From 2016 to 2018, 25 patients who underwent combined reconstruction of ACL and ALL in our Institution were evaluated retrospectively. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score, Tegner Lysholm Knee Score, grade of pivot shift was assessed at a final follow-up. Results: Mean follow-up was 31.5 months (28-42). Mean IKDC (81.5) and Tegner Lysholm (82.8) Knee Scores improved significantly at a final follow-up, with all knees demonstrating negative pivot shift. All patients had good outcomes at 2 years follow-up with no graft failure and with no residual instability. Conclusion: ACL and ALL reconstruction using this technique described for the anterolateral instability of the knee was satisfactory in our patients. This technique is simple, easily reproducible and avoids additional implants for ALL in the tibia. Level of evidence: IV.

Can ACL Tears be Restricted to Sports Injuries Alone? A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The number of people injured following a road traffic accident (RTA) are as high as 2-5 crores around the world every year. The literature from western population suggests that ACL injuries are encountered mostly following high velocity sports injuries in clinical practise. But, in India there are a large group of individuals presenting with ACL injuries following RTAs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with ACL injuries presenting to our hospital following RTAs. All the information pertaining to the ligaments injured, vehicular factors, time of the day and environmental factors were recorded. The data was then analysed statistically. RESULTS: Most injuries occurred in the 31-40 year age group and velocity in the same range. Injuries due to bike skid predominated in our study amounting to 55.9%. Interestingly, very low velocities accidents due to stray dogs accounted to 43.8% and they occur mostly at night. CONCLUSION: The number of patients presenting with RTA related ACL injuries in our country are numerous. Hence, we have made an attempt to show that ACL injuries can occur even at low velocity following motor vehicle accidents in contrast to the western population, where sports related injuries are the most common etiology for such mishaps.

Concurrent Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency in combination with patellar instability are rare occurrences and are difficult to treat. Failure to address patellar instability in such cases may place excessive strain on ACL graft leading to graft rupture. We present three such cases treated by concurrent ACL and medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts. Two patients had MRI evidence of MPFL injury and one patient had intact MPFL on MRI. All patients had good outcome without any residual instability at final follow-up.

A new scoring system for prediction of meniscal repair in traumatic meniscal tears.

PURPOSE: Traditionally, MRI has not been used to predict meniscus tear reparability. An attempt has been made in this study to predict meniscal reparability using MRI, and a new scoring system to help with the same has been developed and tested. METHODS: Thirty repaired menisci were compared with equal number of meniscectomy cases retrospectively. Various clinical and radiological (radiographs and MRI) characteristics like chronicity of tear, pattern of tear, etc, were tabulated. Based on their association with the outcome of repair or meniscectomy, odds ratio of each attribute were calculated. A scoring system-Ortho One PROMT Score (Prediction of Reparability of Meniscal Tears)-to predict meniscal repair was formulated. Using this score, meniscus surgery outcomes were prospectively predicted in 120 cases and results tabulated. RESULTS: The newly devised Ortho One PROMT score predicted medial meniscus repair with a sensitivity of 90.9% and a specificity of 93.2% and medial meniscectomy with a sensitivity of 93.2% and a specificity of 90.9%. It predicts lateral meniscus repair with a sensitivity of 69.2% of patients and lateral meniscectomy with a sensitivity of 78.8% of patients. CONCLUSION: Ortho One PROMT score is a useful scoring system to predict the outcomes of meniscus surgery preoperatively. It uses a combination of clinical and radiological (MRI and plain radiograph) characteristics. With this scoring system, both the surgeon and the patient are better prepared preoperatively regarding the outcome of a particular meniscus surgery. The scoring shall make day-to-day arthroscopic meniscus surgery less stressful. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Functional outcome of an early anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in comparison to delayed: Are we waiting in vain?

BACKGROUND: Surgical techniques of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) have evolved over the past three decades along with debate regarding timing of reconstruction. It was a widespread belief that the timing of surgery was an important factor in determining the resulting stiffness after ACLR. Delayed rather than early reconstruction of the ACL is the current recommended treatment since it is thought to give a better functional outcome. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the optimal time of surgical intervention. The purpose of this study was to compare the range of motion and functional outcome in patients who underwent ACLR early with those that were delayed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients were randomized into two groups; patients who underwent the procedure within three weeks were kept in Group I (Early) and those patients who were reconstructed after six weeks were categorized as Group II (Delayed). Hamstring grafts were used and a standard protocol of surgery and physiotherapy was followed. The range of motion, IKDC and Tegner scores were compared. RESULTS: A hundred and four patients underwent ACLR; fifty-three patients were grouped as Group I (Early) and fifty one as Group II (Delayed). The range of motion of both groups was comparable. The IKDC and Tegner scores were also comparable for early (Group I) ACLR and the patients who had their ACL reconstructed after a delay of at least 6 weeks (Group II). CONCLUSION: There are no clinical differences in terms of range of motion and functional results between early and delayed ACLR.