Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur Radiol ; 29(12): 7080, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31297630

ABSTRACT

The original version of this article, published on 27 May 2019, unfortunately contained a mistake. The following correction has therefore been made in the original.

2.
Eur Radiol ; 29(12): 6559-6570, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31134365

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of dual-energy CT (DECT) material density datasets on diagnostic performance, readers' confidence, and interpretation time for renal lesion detection and characterization in comparison to subtraction CT (SCT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred fourteen patients (69/45 = M/F, mean age = 67 years) who underwent contrast-enhanced DECT between January 2015 and February 2018 for suspected renal mass were included retrospectively. For each patient, three radiologists assessed three image datasets: group A, material density iodine (MDI) + material density water (MDW); group B, SCT only; and group C, SCT + true unenhanced phase + virtual monochromatic images at 65 keV. Readers evaluated image quality (4-point scale), the number of lesions, and likely diagnosis. Reading times were recorded. Quantitatively, iodine concentration (IC from MDI) and delta Hounsfield units (ΔHU) for all lesions were measured. Diagnostic accuracy was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Image quality and interpretation time were compared with Kruskal-Wallis and t tests. RESULTS: Study cohort (230 lesions; mean size = 23.63 mm (5-116 mm)) consisted of 60 enhancing, 158 non-enhancing, and 12 lipid-dominant angiomyolipoma lesions. Significantly higher image quality was demonstrated for MDI compared to SCT (mean score = 3.82 vs. 3; p < 0.05). Comparable diagnostic accuracy was observed for group A (AUC = 0.88) and group C (AUC = 0.87) and was higher compared to that for group B (AUC = 0.75). Group A was read faster than group C (41.49 s vs. 71.45 s per exam; p < 0.05). Both IC and ΔHU values had high accuracy (AUC = 0.97) for differentiating enhancing vs. non-enhancing lesions; however, IC enabled differentiation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma from other enhancing lesions with moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.73). CONCLUSION: MDI images increase readers' confidence for renal lesion detection and characterization while providing a more efficient radiologist workflow, irrespective of readers' experience. KEY POINTS: • Material density iodine (MDI) images enable faster interpretation due to high image quality and potentially reduced need for quantitation. • MDI images increase diagnostic confidence of readers, irrespective of radiologists' experience. • High accuracy with dual-energy CT (DECT) can potentially reduce healthcare costs by eliminating the need for additional investigations.


Subject(s)
Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Dual-Energy Scanned Projection/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Contrast Media , Female , Humans , Kidney/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
3.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 42(2): 631-644, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27624499

ABSTRACT

Hybrid PET/MR scanners are innovative imaging devices that simultaneously or sequentially acquire and fuse anatomical and functional data from magnetic resonance (MR) with metabolic information from positron emission tomography (PET) (Delso et al. in J Nucl Med 52:1914-1922, 2011; Zaidi et al. in Phys Med Biol 56:3091-3106, 2011). Hybrid PET/MR scanners have the potential to greatly impact not only on medical research but also, and more importantly, on patient management. Although their clinical applications are still under investigation, the increased worldwide availability of PET/MR scanners, and the growing published literature are important determinants in their rising utilization for primarily clinical applications. In this manuscript, we provide a summary of the physical features of PET/MR, including its limitations, which are most relevant to clinical PET/MR implementation and to interpretation. Thereafter, we discuss the most important current and emergent clinical applications of such hybrid technology in the abdomen and pelvis, both in the field of oncologic and non-oncologic imaging, and we provide, when possible, a comparison with clinically consolidated imaging techniques, like for example PET/CT.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Multimodal Imaging/methods , Positron-Emission Tomography , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...