ABSTRACT
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Early tightening torque at the implant-healing abutment interface is a recognized concern in implant treatment. However, little is known regarding the effects of toothbrushing methods on the interface established between the implant and healing abutments of different heights. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of different toothbrushing methods on tightening torque for healing abutments of different heights. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 60 implants (Bilimplant; Proimtech) were embedded in epoxy resin blocks. The following 6 test groups were established: healing abutments with manual toothbrush group (Oral B Pro Expert All in one; Oral B) and 4 mm height (MTB-4, (which served as the control); 6 mm height (MTB-6, which served as the control); sonic toothbrush group (Philips Sonicare 3100 Series; Philips Oral Healthcare) and 4 mm height (S-4); 6 mm height (S-6); oscillating/rotating toothbrush group (Oral B Smart 6 6000N; Oral B) and 4 mm height (OR-4) and 6 mm height (OR-6). Each specimen was tightened to 15 Ncm and brushed. The digital torque meter (Cap Torque Tester Series TT01; Mark10) was used to calculate the reverse torque values. RESULTS: The highest torque loss value in the average torque losses in the test groups was 1.3 (OR-6); the lowest was 0.3 (S-4). While a significant difference was found between groups S-4 and S-6 (P=.018), no statistically significant difference was found among the other groups (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: Torque loss was greater in the healing abutment with a height of 6 mm and with the oscillatory and rotational brushing method.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of different shade selection techniques and determine the matching success of crown restorations fabricated using digital shade selection techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Teeth numbers 11 and 21 were prepared on a typodont model. For the #11 tooth, six different crowns were fabricated with randomly selected colors and set as the target crowns. The following four test groups were established: Group C, where the visual shade selection was performed using the Vita 3D Master Shade Guide and the group served as the control; Group Ph, where the shade selection was performed under the guidance of dental photography; Group S, where the shade selection was performed by measuring the target tooth color using a spectrophotometer; and Group I, where the shade selection was performed by scanning the test specimens and target crowns using an intraoral scanner. Based on the test groups, 24 crowns were fabricated using different shade selection techniques. The ΔE values were calculated according to the CIEDE2000 (2:1:1) formula. The collected data were analyzed by means of a one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: For the four test groups (Groups C, Ph, S, and I), the following mean ΔE values were obtained: 2.74, 3.62, 2.13, and 3.5, respectively. No significant differences were found among the test groups. CONCLUSION: Although there was no statistically significant difference among the shade selection techniques, Group S had relatively lower ΔE values. Moreover, according to the test results, the spectrophotometer shade selection technique may provide more successful clinical results.
