Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol ; 32(7): 369-78, 1997 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9383967

ABSTRACT

The main purpose of the study was to describe the characteristics of homeless psychiatric patients, and to compare the treatment they are offered to that offered to domiciled patients by the psychiatric services. Another purpose was to analyse the prevalence of homelessness among psychiatric patients before and after the introduction of community mental health centres in Copenhagen. Cross-sectional studies were conducted in two intervention and two control districts before and after introduction of the new treatment modalities. In 1991, 80 of 1008 patients (8%) were homeless. Male sex, young age, living on general welfare, schizophrenia and alcohol or substance abuse were the factors that most markedly differentiated homeless from domiciled patients. Compared with the treatment of domiciled patients, the homeless were more likely to be offered no further treatment after consultation in a psychiatric emergency and, if admitted, they were more likely to be placed in locked wards, given compulsory medication, and medicated with depot neuroleptics. The homeless were also less likely to be offered psychotherapy and consultation with a social worker. Schizophrenia and alcohol or substance abuse characterised the majority of the patients discharged homeless. In the intervention districts, the number of homeless patients in contact with the psychiatric services was found to increase at the same rate as the number of all patients in contact with the psychiatric services. In the control districts, no changes in prevalence of homeless patients or other patients in contact with the psychiatric services occurred. It is concluded that homeless psychiatric patients comprise a difficult patient group, with problems of schizophrenia, substance abuse and lack of motivation for treatment. It is recommended that special efforts be made to create housing facilities that fit the needs of different types of homeless patients, and that the homeless mentally ill are assisted in obtaining and maintaining an acceptable housing situation.


Subject(s)
Community Mental Health Centers/trends , Ill-Housed Persons/psychology , Medical Indigency/trends , Schizophrenia/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Day Care, Medical/trends , Denmark/epidemiology , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Female , Forecasting , Health Services Accessibility/trends , Health Services Needs and Demand/trends , Ill-Housed Persons/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Schizophrenia/rehabilitation , Substance-Related Disorders/rehabilitation
2.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 158(6): 756-8, 1996 Feb 05.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8638313

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) in pregnant women and the perinatal transmission after treatment was investigated. An analysis of the cost-effectiveness of introducing a screening program among women at risk of having CT was made. Out of 339 pregnant women 2.9% had cervical CT. CT-positive women were treated with erythromycin. CT-positive women were significantly younger than CT-negative women and the odds ratio (OR) of having CT if nulliparous was 3.35. The CT-prevalence was 6.6% among women younger than 25 years and 1.6% among women 25 years or older (p = 0.0163). OR of having CT if younger than 25 years was 4.3. The young women were significantly younger at sexual début. None of the children of women treated for CT during pregnancy developed neonatal CT-conjunctivitis. The screening of women younger than 25 years was considered to be cost-effective. It is concluded that women younger than 25 years are at risk of having CT. Treatment of CT-positive women with erythromycin during pregnancy seems to be effective in eradicating this microorganism and thus preventing perinatal transmission and neonatal CT-conjunctivitis. It therefore seems rational to screen all pregnant women under the age of 25 years for cervical CT, especially in high risk areas.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections , Chlamydia trachomatis , Conjunctivitis, Inclusion/prevention & control , Adult , Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Chlamydia Infections/prevention & control , Chlamydia Infections/transmission , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolation & purification , Conjunctivitis, Inclusion/transmission , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Mass Screening/economics , Pregnancy , Prevalence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...