Splitting the subscapularis at the upper two-third and lower one-third junction or in the middle during the Latarjet-Walch procedure does not affect the external rotation range of motion.

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to investigate (1) the difference in external rotation range of motion (ROM) limitation between the two recommended subscapularis-splitting techniques (mid-split versus upper 2/3rd -lower 1/3rd split) and (2) the differences in elevation ROM, internal rotation ROM, the functional outcomes and the internal rotation strength between the two techniques in the Latarjet-Walch procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with recurrent shoulder instability treated by the Latarjet-Walch procedure between January 2021 and January 2022. After a priori calculation of sample size, 32 patients were divided into two groups according to the type of intraoperative subscapularis split [upper 2/3rd -lower 1/3rd level split (LS group, n=19) versus mid-level split (MS group, n=13)] performed in the Latarjet-Walch procedure. RESULTS: The final ER1 (external rotation with the arm adducted) deficit (as compared to opposite normal shoulder) was not significantly different between the LS (9° ± 8°) and the MS (10° ± 8°, p=0.8) groups. The final ER2 (external rotation with the elbow abducted @ 90°) deficit was not significantly different between that of the LS (14° ± 12°) and the MS groups (12° ± 9°, p=0.5). Only in the MS group were the final ER1 deficit (p=0.03) and the final ER2 deficits (p=0.05) significantly better (smaller) than the corresponding baseline values. The Rowe scores (p=0.2) and the shoulder subjective value (p=0.7) were not significantly different between the two groups. There were no postoperative subluxations in either group. However, 3 patients tested positive in apprehension testing in the LS group compared to none in the MS group, the difference being statistically insignificant. The internal rotation strength was 95% of the normal, unaffected shoulder in the LS group and 93% of the normal in the MS group (p=0.6). Computed tomography (CT) scan evaluation showed that the transverse diameter index of subscapularis (upper subscapularis diameter / lower subscapularis diameter) was not different in the MS (0.9 ± 0.1) and the LS (0.9 ± 0.1, p=0.3) groups. CONCLUSION: We found no difference in final external rotation limitation between the upper 2/3rd - lower 1/3rd versus mid-level subscapularis split techniques. The functional outcomes, the internal rotation strength, subscapularis transverse diameter index, and fatty infiltration in the CT scan were similar in both groups.

Neglected and locked anterior shoulder dislocation: functional outcomes and complications after open reduction and preservation of humeral head.

Background: Neglected and locked anterior shoulder dislocation is a rare problem that presents several treatment challenges. Our study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes and postoperative complications after open reduction and head preservation surgery in patients with neglected and locked anterior shoulder dislocation. Methods: Ten patients (age 51 ± 22 years) with a follow-up of 27 months ± 7 months (range 24-40 months) were included in the study. The anteriorly dislocated humeral heads were open and reduced after an average neglect of 10 ± 15 months. The neglected dislocation was classified into two types by the severity of the injury. (1) Type 1: There were no associated severe injuries, and the humeral head was reduced in the glenoid cavity without take-down of the subscapularis (type 1a) (n = 5) or via take-down of the upper half of the subscapularis (type 1b) (n = 2). (2) Type 2: There were associated factors such as a greater tuberosity fracture (n = 2) or a grade 3/4 fatty infiltrated supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles (n = 1). Complete removal of the subscapularis was necessary to reduce the humeral head. Results: The pain scores improved from a baseline value of 8 ± 1 to a final value of 1 ± 1 (P < .001), the absolute Constant score improved from a baseline value of 13 ± 8 to a final value of 69 ± 21 (P < .001), elevation range of motion (ROM) improved from a baseline value of 44° ± 43° to a final value of 123° ± 30° (P < .001), external rotation ROM improved from 0° ± 13° to 49° ± 12° (P < .001), and internal rotation ROM improved from sacroiliac joint ± 2 vertebra level to thoracic T11 ± 3 vertebrae level (P < .0001). The final shoulder subjective value was 77 ± 20 and was excellent in 3 patients, good in 5 patients, fair in 1, and poor in 1 patient. Major complications were observed in 30% (n = 3) of patients: persistent humeral head anterior subluxation in 20% (n = 2) of patients and superior migration of the humeral head in 10% (n = 1) of patients. Conclusion: Open reduction and head preservation in patients with neglected anterior dislocation led to good functional outcomes in 70% (as per Constant score) to 80% (as per shoulder subjective value) of the patients. However, we observed major complications such as persistent anterior subluxation (n = 2) and superior head migration (n = 1), leading to suboptimal functional outcomes in cases with associated factors such as a greater tuberosity fracture or severe fatty infiltrated cuff muscles.

Frozen shoulder after COVID-19 vaccination versus idiopathic frozen shoulder: similar clinical features and functional improvement at 1-year follow-up.

Background: Frozen shoulder after COVID-19 vaccination is sparsely discussed in the medical literature. We aimed to evaluate: (1) the differences in the baseline clinical features and functional outcomes of conservatively treated frozen shoulder following COVID-19 vaccination compared to idiopathic frozen shoulder (2) the improvements in pain scores, functional outcomes, and range of motion (ROM) at 6-10 months and at 1 year of follow-up in patients with frozen shoulder after COVID-19 vaccination treated by conservative therapy. Methods: Between June 2021 and December 2021, 12 patients (13 shoulders) that were diagnosed with frozen shoulder after COVID-19 vaccination (vaccine related frozen shoulder [VRF] group) (final follow-up of 12.4 months ± 0.8 months) were compared with 20 patients that were diagnosed as idiopathic frozen shoulder unrelated to vaccination (unvaccinated frozen shoulder [UFS] group) (average follow-up of 13.4 ± 3.1 months). All patients were treated with home-based stretching exercises. Four (33%) patients in the VRF group and 15 (75%) patients in the UFS group underwent steroid injection in the suprascapular notch by an experienced radiologist. Results: The left side was affected more frequently in the VRF group [n = 10 (83.3%)] than in the UFS group [n = 8 (40%), P = .03]. The VRF and the UFS groups were similar in the rest of the baseline clinical features, such as the age distribution, men/women ratio, baseline Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS), ROM deficit, and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. The OSS, VAS pain scores, and the ROM deficit significantly improved in the VRF group at the 6-10-month follow-up and then at the final (12.4 ± 0.8 months) follow-up compared to the baseline values. At the final follow-up, there were no significant differences in the average external rotation, external rotation deficit, elevation, elevation deficit, internal rotation, pain VAS scores, and OSS between the VRF and the UFS group. Conclusion: To conclude, frozen shoulder following COVID-19 vaccination may present with clinical features similar to those of the idiopathic frozen shoulder. Furthermore, the patients with frozen shoulder following COVID-19 vaccination may continue to improve over one year with conservative treatment; the final improvements in function and ROM are similar to those with idiopathic frozen shoulder.

Safety-driven master's technique of the Latarjet-Walch procedure and its short-term complications: experience in a study of 150 consecutive patients.

Background: Although the classic open Latarjet has a low recurrence rate in unstable shoulders, this advantage may be offset by the higher number of complications. We aimed to report the safety-driven nuanced steps and the resulting short-term complications of the Latarjet-Walch technique. Methods: Between 2016 and 2022, 150 patients who underwent the Latarjet procedure following the key safety-driven technical steps were retrospectively evaluated for intraoperative and short-term (3 months) complications. The complications were divided into 3 types: Any adverse event that did not need a change in the treatment protocol was a type 1 complication. An event that resulted in a prolongation of rehabilitation protocol or an additional medical line of treatment was classified as type 2, and an event that resulted in readmission, a resurgery, or one that affected the outcome was classified as a type 3 complication. Results: There were 12 (8%) short-term complications in 9 patients. Neurological complications were noted in 3 (2%) patients (1 axillary nerve injury, 1 suprascapular nerve injury, and 1 musculocutaneous nerve injury). Type 1 complications were noted in 2 patients: 2 patients had hematoma that was detected as superficial swelling, but no surgical drainage was needed, and both resolved at their 1-month follow-up. Type 2 complications were noted in 4 patients. One patient had surgical site infection and a second patient had superficial wound dehiscence in the lower part of the wound. The third patient had suprascapular nerve paresis and the fourth had musculocutaneous nerve paresis and shoulder stiffness. Both nerve injuries recovered completely after 6 months of rehabilitation. Type 3 complications were noted in 3 patients. One patient had axillary nerve paresis and shoulder stiffness. The axillary nerve palsy had recovered partially by 8 months. One patient had an intraoperative graft fracture and postoperative shoulder stiffness, and the third patient had shoulder stiffness. Conclusion: Following the safety-driven nuanced steps in the Latarjet-Walch procedure, the short-term complication rate was 8%, and the neurological complication was 2% (n = 3). The musculocutaneous and suprascapular nerves completely recovered, and the axillary nerve had partially recovered.

Coracoid graft resorption after the Latarjet procedure does not depend on the preoperative glenoid defect.

BACKGROUND: The primary purpose was to compare coracoid graft resorption after the Latarjet procedure in patients without preoperative glenoid bone loss vs. those with more than critical glenoid loss. The secondary purposes were to compare the functional outcomes and to investigate the association of graft position, angle of the screws, preoperative glenoid defect, age at surgery, and smoking status with graft resorption. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients with recurrent anterior instability were treated by the Latarjet procedure as the index procedure, irrespective of the glenoid bone loss between 2018 and 2021. Fifty-five patients were evaluated via computed tomography scans after a minimum of 1 year after surgery (range: 1-4 years). Twenty-five patients had no prior glenoid defect (No-defect group), 24 patients had preoperative glenoid defects ≥15% (Critical defect group), and 6 patients had glenoid defects between 5% and 15%. The No-defect group (n = 25) was compared with the Critical defect group (n = 24). Multivariate logistical regression was performed to evaluate the association of independent factors with the grade of resorption for all 55 patients in the cohort. RESULTS: Major graft resorption at the level of the superior screw was observed in 72%-84% of patients in the No-defect group (n = 25) and in 75%-83% of patients in the Critical defect group (n = 24) (P = 1, P = 1; no significant difference). No to mild resorption at the level of the inferior screw was observed in 96% of patients in the No-defect group and 100% of patients in the Critical defect group (P = 1; no significant difference). Postoperative Rowe scores (100 [95-100] vs. 100 [95-100]; P = .8) and shoulder subjective value (87 [11] vs. 86 [9]; P = .9) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. None of the independent factors, including the corresponding screw angle, the mediolateral graft positioning, prior glenoid defect, age, and smoking status, were associated with graft resorption in multivariate logistical regression. CONCLUSIONS: Graft resorption after the Latarjet procedure does not depend on the preoperative glenoid defect. The coracoid graft may be mostly resorbed around the superior screw but mildly or none at the level of the inferior screw, but this graft resorption is not dependent on the smoking status, age, prior glenoid defect, mediolateral graft positioning, and the angle of the screws.

Shoulder Pain and Injury after COVID-19 Vaccination.

Shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) is a term given to describe shoulder pain and dysfunction arising within 48 hours after vaccine administration and lasting for more than one week. While SIRVA is most commonly seen after influenza and tetanus vaccines, there have been a few recent case reports describing SIRVA-like symptoms after COVID-19 vaccine administration. Two patients presented to the shoulder surgeon's practice center with complaints of shoulder stiffness and pain following the COVID-19 vaccine. The first patient was a 33-year-old man; he presented within 2 days of onset of the pain and 14 days from the vaccine date. He had a complete restriction of shoulder motion (0° flexion, and no external or internal rotation) at presentation. This patient was treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and rested in a sling for a week. The second patient was a 53-year-old woman; she presented with a 6-week duration of mild restriction of active shoulder motion and shoulder pain. Her magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed the presence of subacromial-subdeltoid bursitis. She was treated with subacromial steroid injection and range of motion shoulder exercises. Both patients recovered a near-normal range of motion recovery within a month, and their pain improved significantly. The main lessons from this case report were: (1) patients presenting with a recent increase in pain and acute loss of shoulder movements after vaccination may be managed conservatively with rest and NSAID medications and (2) in case of a subacromial-subdeltoid bursitis in the MRI, subacromial injection of steroid may provide good pain relief.

Surgeon administered direct adductor canal block is as good as ultrasound guided adductor canal block in pain management in knee replacements- A retrospective case-control study.

Aim: The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of the DACB in a clinical setting and compare the efficacy of postoperative pain relief after TKR in the patients administered DACB versus USG guided ACB. Also to see efficacy and safety of USACB in patients operated with medial parapatellar and subvastus approach. Material and methods: 250 consecutive patients operated with TKR between Jan 2019 to March 2022 were included. Group A included patients operated with medial parapatellar approach and received USACB, Group B included patients operated with medial parapatellar approach and received DACB while Group C included patients operated with subvastus approach and received USACB. VAS scores between three groups were compared at 12 and 24 h. All three groups of patients were otherwise treated identically in the hospital. Results: The mean age and BMI was not statistically significant between the three groups. The mean VAS pain score at rest at 12 h was 3.06 ± 1.49 (Group A) vs 1.58 ± 1.19 (Group B) [p < 0.0001] and 3.06 ± 1.49 (Group A) vs 1.88 ± 1.18 (Group C) [p < 0.0001]; and at 24 h was 1.88 ± 1.31 (Group A) vs 2.39 ± 1.27 (Group B) [p = 0.023] and 1.88 ± 1.31 (Group A) vs 2.19 ± 1.29 (Group C) [p = 0.16]. The mean theatre time was 151.9 ± 11.37 min (Group A) vs 141.02 ± 19.46 min (Group B) (p = 0.0003) and 151.9 ± 11.37 min (Group A) vs 150.4 ± 28.74 min (Group C) (p = 0.72). Hospital stay was 3.82 ± 0.80 (Group A) vs 4.0 ± 1.09 (Group B) [p = 0.30] and 3.82 ± 0.80 (Group A) vs 2.7 ± 0.69 (Group C) [p < 0.0001]. Group B and Group C had one complication each. Conclusion: USG ACB irrespective of approach used remains the gold standard in providing consistent pain relief and thereby facilitating early discharge. However, increased operating room turnover time and repeated top-ups remain a disadvantage. Both the quantum of pain relief and the potential downsides remained the same irrespective of the surgical approach used and whether or not steroid was added to the cocktail used for infiltration. On the other hand, DACB provides a short lasting (24 h) adequate pain relief after TKR with similar low complication rates. The technique of DACB may have a potential for a wider use especially in centres where outpatient arthroplasties are performed, if newer longer acting anaesthetic/analgesic combinations are devised.

An unusual case of traumatic medial eversion-dislocation of the patella: a case report.

Medial dislocation of patella has been commonly reported as a complication of the surgical release of the lateral patella-femoral ligament. A traumatic medial eversion-dislocation of the patella has not been earlier reported. We report an unusual case of traumatic medial patellar eversion-dislocation in a young adult patient whose magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a discontinuity in medial and lateral patellar retinacula. However, intraoperatively, the retinacula were found intact, and relocation of the patella was achieved by flipping the patella through a small hole in the patellar tendon. No reconstruction of the ligaments was needed. At 1-year follow-up, the patient achieved full range of movements of the knee, and there were no subjective complaints of instability. In our case, although the patella was medially everted and dislocated, both the retinacula were still intact. Clinicians should be aware that acute traumatic patella medial dislocation and eversion can occur without disruption of the medial or lateral retinaculum. Furthermore, knee MRI may suggest patellar retinacula disruption because of the retinaculum's obscure and tortuous course in patients with these injuries.

Arthroscopic Reduction of a Missed/Neglected Anterior Shoulder Dislocation and Concomitant Repair of the Rotator Cuff Tendon.

Patients with neglected/missed anterior shoulder dislocation and an associated rotator cuff tear present a dilemma for the correct surgical approach that will facilitate a reduction of the dislocation and repair of the rotator cuff tear. This report describes an arthroscopic technique using standard arthroscopic portals to reduce neglected (3-6 weeks) anterior shoulder dislocation and repair the rotator cuff tendon. The arthroscopy is performed in a beach chair position using anterolateral and anteromedial portals for reduction of the shoulder dislocation. The same anterolateral portal is used as a viewing portal, and the anteromedial portal and an additional lateral portal are used for subsequent rotator cuff repair.

Frozen shoulder after COVID-19 vaccination.

Background: The data on frozen shoulder and shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination are absent from the literature. Hence, the purpose of this case series was to describe the clinical presentation and short-term follow-up of patients who developed frozen shoulder after COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: In the present study, 10 patients (9 women and 1 man) with a mean age of 53 ± 8 years (range, 43-68 years) who presented to the shoulder surgeon's practice center with painful stiffness of the shoulder after COVID-19 vaccination between June 1 and September 30, 2021, were retrospectively evaluated. Results: All 10 patients had normal radiographs and were diagnosed as frozen shoulder. Eight patients (80%) had a comorbidity during presentation (4 patients with hypothyroidism, 3 patients with diabetes mellitus, and 1 patient with prediabetes/hyperglycemia). Symptoms developed immediately after the vaccination in 6 patients (60%), at 48 hours in 1 patient (10%), and at 10 days in 3 patients (30%). The mean pain visual analog scale score was 6.5 ± 1.9 (range, 2.5-8), and both active and passive range of motion were limited in all the patients at the time of presentation. Conclusion: The musculoskeletal specialists who will see such patients with painful shoulder stiffness should be aware of the frozen shoulder diagnosis, which can occur after COVID-19 vaccination, so that such patients can be identified and treated early.

Can We Innovatively Modify the Surgical Helmets to Protect Against the Droplets and Aerosols of COVID-19?

We tested the filtration efficiency of Stryker T5 surgical helmets with and without the addition of a filter medium. Two particle counters were used to count the particles of sizes .5 µm, 1 µm, and 5 µm, both inside and outside the Stryker T5 helmet, concurrently. The total inward leakage (TIL) for the helmet with and without the filter was zero for 5 µm particles at all time points. The TIL (3.4) for the .5 µm particles decreased significantly after application of the filter (1.7; P = .007). We recommend that an N95 should be used inside the helmet system.

Validation of an on-screen application-based measurement of shoulder range of motion over telehealth medium.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder range-of-motion (ROM) assessment is vital for the follow-up evaluation of operated patients and for the outcome-based research studies. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and reliability of a remote on-screen application (app)-based method of shoulder ROM measurement through a telehealth medium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consultant shoulder surgeon, a board-certified orthopedic resident, and a graduate medical doctor served as the examiners. The cohort consisted of 24 healthy volunteers and 16 symptomatic patients with expected shoulder ROM deficits. Shoulder ROM was first examined physically using a goniometer in the clinic and then over Zoom remote conferencing using the protractor extension app of the Chrome browser. RESULTS: Instrument validity was examined by comparing the goniometer method with the protractor app-based method of the expert shoulder consultant using Bland-Altman analysis. It showed only minor mean differences between the healthy volunteers and the patients in elevation (2.0° and 5.0°, respectively), abduction (2.0° and 3.0°, respectively), external rotation with the elbow adducted (1.9° and 0.2°, respectively), external rotation with the elbow abducted at 90° (0.4° and 4°, respectively), and internal rotation with elbow abducted at 90° (2.3° and 1.2°, respectively), with limits of agreement that were below the well-established minimal clinically important difference values. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values varied between 0.83 and 0.96 for the volunteers and between 0.90 and 0.98 for the patients, indicating excellent correlation between the 2 methods. The interobserver reliability between 2 examiners for the protractor app-based method as evaluated by ICC scores was excellent; it ranged between 0.86 and 0.98 for the volunteers and between 0.88 and 0.99 for the patients. Comparison of the protractor app-based method with the gold-standard goniometer method for the resident and the graduate doctor showed excellent ICC values. CONCLUSION: A protractor app-based method of measuring shoulder ROM over a telehealth medium is accurate and reliable compared with a clinical goniometer method. This validated method can be used during remote telehealth consultation with significant benefits of saving patients travel and time during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic and even later.

Capsular repair is not an important part of the Latarjet-Walch procedure.

BACKGROUND: Patte et al noted that the Latarjet procedure works by the triple blocking effect of (1) the conjoint tendon sling effect, (2) the bone block effect, and (3) the capsular repair. However, no clinical study has specifically investigated the role of capsular repair in the Latarjet procedure. AIMS: The primary aim was to compare (1) the external rotation range of motion (ROM) achieved after the Latarjet procedure with and without the capsule to coracoacromial (CA-CAL) repair. The secondary aims were to compare the functional outcomes, forward elevation ROM, and internal rotation ROM after the Latarjet procedure with and without the CA-CAL repair. METHODS: A prospective cohort of 30 patients who underwent the Latarjet-Walch procedure with a CA-CAL repair between October 2018 and February 2020 was compared with the preceding group of 31 patients who underwent the Latarjet-Walch procedure without any capsular repair between October 2016 and September 2018, at a minimum of 1-year of follow-up. RESULTS: External rotation with the elbow abducted at 90° (ER2) deficit (compared to the normal opposite side) was significantly larger after the CA-CAL repair augmentation of the Latarjet procedure (mean difference = 6°, P = .03) than that after no repair. External rotation with the elbow adducted (ER1) deficit after the CA-CAL repair augmentation was not significantly different from that after no repair. ER2 deficit of more than 15° (minimum clinically important difference) was observed in 11 patients (38%) in the CA-CAL repair group and 3 patients (10%, P = .015) in the no repair group. Walch-Duplay score, Rowe score, and Subjective Shoulder Value were not significantly different between the CA-CAL repair group and the no repair group. Covariates of hand dominance, overhead sports, and glenoid defect size did not significantly affect the ER2 deficit and ER1 deficit outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study disproved the long-held belief that capsular repair is an essential step of the Latarjet-Walch procedure. Capsular repair to the coracoacromial ligament in the Latarjet procedure leads to a clinically insignificant restriction of external rotation (with the arm abducted), no restriction of external rotation (with the arm adducted), but functional outcomes similar to those after Latarjet without a capsular repair in a nonoverhead athlete.