High frequency of nonadherence to Clostridium difficile treatment guidelines.

OBJECTIVES: The 2010 Infectious Diseases Society of America/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America treatment guidelines for Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) recommend oral metronidazole for mild-to-moderate disease and oral vancomycin for severe disease. Given that disease severity is easily determined by the peripheral white blood cell count and serum creatinine level, a computerized decision support (CDS) pathway to guide treatment is inherently appealing. Because providers often override or ignore the computer-based alerts, the proposed CDS pathway should be justified before implementation. METHODS: We undertook this study to ascertain the frequency of nonadherence to CDI guidelines. Between October 1, 2007 and September 30, 2008, a total of 229 cases were screened and 78 cases were included in the study, which took place at a 661-bed acute tertiary care teaching hospital. RESULTS: During the year-long study of CDI cases at our tertiary care hospital, 61.5% (48/78) of the patients received an antibiotic regimen that was not recommended by the 2010 guidelines. Among the 35 patients with mild-to-moderate CDI, 85.7% (30/35) received the recommended treatment of oral metronidazole monotherapy; in contrast, among the 43 patients with severe disease, none (0/43) received the recommended treatment of oral vancomycin monotherapy (P < 0.01). Moreover, 17.9% (14/78) of patients received concurrent oral metronidazole and vancomycin, a regimen that is not recommended anywhere in the Infectious Diseases Society of America/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines and which may be associated with a poor outcome. Patients who received combination oral metronidazole and vancomycin were not more likely to have comorbidities or severe CDI compared with those who received a single antibiotic agent. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of this study, we plan to educate our providers on the treatment of CDI through a CDS pathway in an effort to increase guideline adherence, decrease inappropriate antibiotic use, and potentially improve patient outcomes.

An unusual etiology of infective endocarditis: Enterobacter cloacae.

Gram-negative microorganisms are rarely implicated in causing infective endocarditis (IE). Although the traditionally identified risk factor for Gram-negative endocarditis has been intravenous drug abuse, recent studies have revealed that healthcare contact and the presence of prosthetic cardiac devices are primary risk factors for IE secondary to non-HACEK Gram-negative bacteria. We present a case of Enterobacter endocarditis in a patient with no prior history of valvular heart disease, implanted endovascular device, or intravenous drug abuse. The patient was treated successfully with carbapenem monotherapy. We have reviewed 43 cases of Enterobacter endocarditis reported in the literature to date. Clinical summary and management of IE secondary to Enterobacter based on all the published cases is outlined.

Fever of unknown origin: a case of cardiac myxoma infected with Staphylococcus lugdunensis.

Infected cardiac myxoma is a rare entity. It poses a diagnostic challenge as clinical presentation may reflect an underlying infectious, immune, or a neoplastic disease process. To the best of our knowledge, the first case of a cardiac myxoma infected with Staphylococcus lugdunensis is reported in a 54-year-old man with fever of unknown origin for 4 months. Successful excision of the tumor was performed and was followed by an uneventful recovery. Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of infected cardiac myxomas are discussed.

An electronic hand hygiene surveillance device: a pilot study exploring surrogate markers for hand hygiene compliance.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of using an electronic hand hygiene surveillance and feedback monitoring device. DESIGN: A 2-phase pilot study included initial direct observation of hand hygiene practices as part of routine hospital quality assurance (phase I) and subsequent monitoring using an electronic hand hygiene surveillance device (phase II). SETTING: A 700-bed tertiary care teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Phase I included a convenience sample of healthcare workers. Phase II included 7 medical interns and 7 registered nurses recruited through email and at work-related meetings. METHODS: During phase I, healthcare workers were directly observed at patient room entry and exit during the period April through November 2008. During phase II, hand hygiene data were gathered through indirect observation using the electronic device during a 4-week period in August 2009. Twenty patient rooms were fitted with electronic trigger devices that signaled a reader unit worn by participants when they entered the room, and 70 dispensers for liquid soap or hand sanitizer were fitted with triggers that signaled the reader unit when the dispenser was used. The accuracy of the devices was checked by the principal investigator, who manually recorded his room entries and exits and dispenser use while wearing a reader unit. RESULTS: During phase I, hand hygiene occurred before room entry for 95 (25.1%) and after room exit for 149 (39.4%) of 378 directly observed patient room visits, for a cumulative composite compliance rate of 32.3%. Among the 378 room visits, 347 (91.8%) involved contact with the patient and/or environment. During phase II, electronic monitoring revealed a cumulative composite compliance rate of 25.5%. The electronic device captured 61 (98%) of 62 manually recorded room entries and 133 (95%) of 140 manually recorded dispensing events. CONCLUSIONS: The electronic hand hygiene surveillance device seems to be a practical method for routinely monitoring hand hygiene compliance in healthcare workers.