Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Anal Toxicol ; 43(6): 497-503, 2019 Jul 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31329888

ABSTRACT

Methoxetamine (MXE) and the arylcyclohexylamines 3-methoxy-PCP (3-MeO-PCP) and 4-methoxy-PCP (4-MeO-PCP) are substituted analogs of the dissociative psychoactive substances ketamine and phencyclidine (PCP), respectively. They have emerged on the new psychoactive substances (NPS) market as legal alternatives to these classically banned dissociatives. Little data has been published regarding the cross-reactivity of these NPS in PCP immunoassays (IAs). The aim of this work was to explore the possibilities of detecting 3-MeO-PCP, 4-MeO-PCP, MXE and ketamine in commercial IAs for PCP. The cross-reactivity study was performed in five different PCP IAs using urine-free, spiked samples and urine samples obtained from two 3-MeO-PCP overdose cases. 3-MeO-PCP and 4-MeO-PCP showed cross-reactivity (ranging from 1-143%) in all PCP IAs evaluated. MXE only showed very weak cross-reactivity (ranged from 0.04 to 0.25%) and ketamine was not detected in any PCP IA evaluated. Urine samples from the two overdose cases were positive for PCP in all IAs evaluated. The commercial PCP IAs evaluated exhibited utility as rapid, preliminary screening techniques for 3-MeO-PCP and 4-MeO-PCP, but not for ketamine. The low reactivity of MXE limits its detectability in the PCP IAs evaluated.


Subject(s)
Immunoassay , Phencyclidine , Psychotropic Drugs/urine , Body Fluids , Cyclohexanones , Cyclohexylamines , Drug Overdose , Humans , Ketamine , Phencyclidine/analogs & derivatives
2.
Forensic Sci Int ; 290: e9-e14, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30055870

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical utility of glycolic acid (GA) determination in the diagnosis and prognosis of ethylene glycol (EG) intoxications. METHOD: Systematic review of serum and/or urine GA concentrations available in the literature in cases of EG poisoning. Present a clinical case in which the determination of the GA was decisive. RESULTS: In total, 137 patients were included. Serum GA concentrations (but not EG) of patients who survive are different from those who die. The optimal cut-off of serum GA to predict mortality was 990.5mg/L (sensitivity 85.2%, specificity 54.3%) with an Odds Ratio of 6.838 (2.868-16.302). In our clinical case, serum EG was negative; however, urine GA was positive (1230.7mg/L). CONCLUSIONS: In all suspected cases of EG poisoning, it is advisable to carry out the simultaneous analysis of EG and GA.


Subject(s)
Ethylene Glycol/poisoning , Glycolates/blood , Glycolates/urine , Biomarkers/blood , Biomarkers/urine , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Poisoning/diagnosis , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
J Anal Toxicol ; 41(9): 760-764, 2017 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28985315

ABSTRACT

Pantoprazole is a frequently prescribed proton pump inhibitor (PPI) commonly utilized in the management of gastrointestinal symptoms. Few substances have proved to cause a false-positive cannabinoid urine screen. However, a case of false-positive urine cannabinoid screen in a patient who received a pantoprazole dose has been recently published. The purpose of this study was to determine the potential cross-reactivity of pantoprazole in the cannabinoid immunoassays: Alere Triage® TOX Drug Screen, KIMS® Cannabinoids II and DRI® Cannabinoids Assay. Drug-free urine to which pantoprazole was added up to 12,000 µg/mL produced negative results in the DRI® Cannabinoids and KIMS® Cannabinoids II. Alere Triage® TOX Drug Screen assay gave positive results at pantoprazole concentrations higher than 1,000 µg/mL. Urine samples from 8 pediatric patients were collected at the beginning of their pantoprazole treatment. Alere Triage® TOX Drug Screen assay produced positive test results in all patient samples and KIMS® Cannabinoids II immunoassay produced positive test results in one patient sample. None patient sample gave a false-positive result when analyzed by the DRI® Cannabinoids Assay. Our findings demonstrate that some cannabinoids immunoassays are susceptible to cross-reaction errors resulting from the presence in urine of pantoprazole and the resulting metabolism of the parent drug. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of false-positive results for cannabinoids after a pantoprazole treatment.


Subject(s)
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/urine , Cannabinoids/urine , Proton Pump Inhibitors/urine , Substance Abuse Detection , False Positive Reactions , Humans , Immunoassay/methods , Pantoprazole , Urinalysis
4.
Ther Drug Monit ; 39(2): 192-196, 2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28207572

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are medical drugs used to treat the chemoprophylaxis of malaria and a second-line anti-inflammatory drug. METHODS: We performed a study of cross-reactivity of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in the DRI Amphetamine Assay inspired by a case report of a self-ingestion of chloroquine after a family dispute, that involved the following: (1) an in vitro study with control samples of healthy subjects, (2) an in vivo study with samples of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and (3) an evaluation of the cross-reactivity of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in 3 additional immunoassays. RESULTS: In the case report, the Amphetamine DRI assay resulted positive both at 1000 ng/mL cutoff (1507 and 1137 ng/mL) and at 500 ng/mL cutoff (1178 and 642 ng/mL). Chloroquine urine levels were 103,900 and 100,900 ng/mL at 5 and 9 hours after ingestion. The results with control samples showed a positive cross-reactivity of chloroquine in the DRI Amphetamine Assay (approximately 0.74% and 0.89% at cutoff of 1000 and 500 ng/mL, respectively). Hydroxychloroquine did not cross-react with the DRI Amphetamine Assay up to 1,000,000 ng/mL. In patients treated with chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, DRI Amphetamine did not produce false-positive results. The comparative assay study showed a positive cross-reactivity of chloroquine in the Emit II Plus Amphetamines Assay with control samples. CONCLUSIONS: Chloroquine can cause false-positive results in the DRI Amphetamine Assay when it is present at high concentrations. Hydroxychloroquine did not produce false-positive results neither in the DRI Amphetamine Assay nor in the others immunoassays evaluated.


Subject(s)
Amphetamine/urine , Chloroquine/urine , Hydroxychloroquine/urine , Adolescent , Amphetamine/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/urine , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/urine , Chloroquine/therapeutic use , Cross Reactions/physiology , Female , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Immunoassay/methods , Substance Abuse Detection/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...