ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate the beneficial effect of bevacizumab injection one week prior to panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) on the occurrence of vitreous hemorrhage (VH) following PRP in high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). METHODS: This was a case-control pilot study conducted on two groups: an anti-VEGF treatment group, treated with bevacizumab injection one week prior to the first PRP session, and a control group of treatment-naive PDR patients who underwent PRP treatment and were not given an intravitreal bevacizumab injection, consecutively recruited. In both groups, a complete ophthalmological examination was conducted prior to PRP and at 4, 9, and 16 weeks following treatment. The primary endpoint studied was the occurrence of VH. RESULTS: The control group included 69 patients (mean age 63±12.3 years) with high-risk PDR who received PRP treatment only, and the anti-VEGF treatment group included 67 patients (mean age 63.13±10.3 years). None of the demographic variables or comorbidities showed any significant difference between the two groups. The number of PRP sessions was not significantly correlated to the occurrence of VH in either of the groups (P=0.167). Vitreous hemorrhage within 16 weeks following laser treatment occurred in 10 patients (14.5%) in the control group and in only 3 patients (4.5%) in the anti-VEGF group (P=0.047). CONCLUSION: Our case-control pilot study demonstrates that a bevacizumab injection preceding the initial PRP session might be beneficial in reducing the occurrence of VH in the first 16 weeks following PRP.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Bevacizumab/adverse effects , Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy , Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology , Vitreous Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Vitreous Hemorrhage/etiology , Vitreous Hemorrhage/therapy , Angiogenesis Inhibitors , Pilot Projects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Laser Coagulation/adverse effects , Intravitreal Injections , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To assess the outcomes of iris fixated (IF) posterior chamber (PC) intraocular lens (IOL) versus scleral-fixated (SF) PC IOL implantation, and compare them with the results reviewed from the literature. SETTING: The study took place in the ophthalmology department of the Eye and Ear Hospital (Lebanon). DESIGN: This is a retrospective institutional study that collected the records of patients admitted for secondary IOL implantation between January 2007 and December 2016. METHODS: A total of 28 eyes that underwent PC IOL fixation were included, 13 of which underwent trans-scleral PC IOL fixation and 15 of which underwent iris PC IOL fixation. Data were analyzed over a period of 3 years. RESULTS: Of the 28 patients, 18 (64.3%) were male and 10 (35.7%) were female (mean age at intervention 36.78±23.47 [standard deviation, SD] years). There were no significant intergroup differences with regard to baseline values and demographic characteristics. Trauma was the most common etiology for posterior capsule insufficiency (82.1%). The mean preoperative baseline BCVA was 0.58±0.27 logMAR for SF and 0.27±0.20 logMAR for IF (P=0.07). Both groups had significant improvement in vision during the follow up period. No significant differences were noted regarding early or late postoperative complications between the two groups. CONCLUSION: SF and IF techniques for PC IOL have similar outcomes and result in a significant improvement in BCVA. When compared to AC (anterior chamber) IOL, both techniques seem to yield fewer complications.
Subject(s)
Iris/surgery , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/methods , Lenses, Intraocular , Sclera/surgery , Suture Techniques , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cataract Extraction/methods , Female , Humans , Lebanon , Lens Capsule, Crystalline/pathology , Lens Capsule, Crystalline/surgery , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/adverse effects , Lenses, Intraocular/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Suture Techniques/adverse effects , Visual Acuity , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To study the epidemiology and mid-term results of the Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) in various etiologies of refractory glaucoma in a Lebanese center, and to assess complications and factors that influence the surgical success rate. METHODS: In this retrospective epidemiological study, we reviewed 108 eyes with refractory glaucoma that underwent an AGV implantation in a tertiary care center in Lebanon between January 2002 and August 2014. Findings including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intra-ocular pressure (IOP), number of antiglaucoma medications, factors influencing the surgical outcome, success rate and complications were also reviewed. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up was 29.85±21.45 months [range, 3-60 months]. As in other Arab countries and compared to the rest of the world, the rate of neovascular glaucoma (NVG) was particularly high, occurring in 63 eyes (58.3%), and represented the primary cause of refractory glaucoma. Mean IOP was significantly reduced to 17.97±7.35mmHg at the last follow-up visit (P<0.05). Similarly, a significant decrease was noted in the number of antiglaucoma medications (P<0.05). The surgical success rate, defined as a postoperative IOP<21, was significantly higher (62.0%), in older patients, those with baseline BCVA≤2 LogMAR and those with a history of hypertension (P<0.01). Hyphema was the most noted complication. CONCLUSION: The AGV is a safe and effective procedure for lowering IOP in refractory glaucoma patients, with hyphema being the most frequent complication. Both the presence of hyperstension and initial BCVA≤2 LogMAR seem to increase the success rate of the procedure. NVG remains the most common etiology for implantation, probably due to uncontrolled diabetes in the Middle East and North Africa.
