High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Early Emergency Department Management of Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure Due to Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is the recommended ventilatory support for acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE) associated with acute respiratory failure or hypercapnia. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has emerged as an alternative to NIV in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. We aimed to assess the efficacy of HFNC on early changes in [Formula: see text] and respiratory parameters in patients in the emergency department with acute hypercapnic CPE and to compare it to NIV. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study in consecutive emergency department patients with acute hypercapnic CPE. Subjects received either HFNC or NIV, according to the attending emergency physician's expertise in HFNC. The primary outcome was change in [Formula: see text] after treatment for 1 h. Secondary outcomes were change in pH, breathing frequency, signs of work of breathing, and comparisons to NIV. RESULTS: Twenty-seven subjects with a discharge diagnosis of hypercapnic CPE were analyzed. Subjects had a median age of 87 y (interquartile range [IQR] 78-93); 37% were male. Twelve (44%) received HFNC, and 15 (56%) received NIV. Median of changes in [Formula: see text] from baseline to after 1 h of treatment were 7 mm Hg (IQR 4-11, P = .002) for HFNC and 3 mm Hg (IQR 1-8, P = .02) for NIV, with no between-group difference. pH, breathing frequency and signs of work of breathing also improved after both HFNC and NIV. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study suggests that HFNC treatment for 1 h improves [Formula: see text] and respiratory parameters in subjects with hypercapnic acute CPE in a manner that is comparable to NIV. Further studies are needed to assess HFNC as a possible alternative to NIV in early management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure of cardiogenic origin. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT03883555.).

Comparison of Outcomes in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Mastectomy Alone.

OBJECTIVES: Immediate implant-based techniques are common practice in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Previous studies have shown an increased complication rate in the setting of immediate versus delayed, MD reconstruction. We aimed to quantify any additional risk in complications when implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is performed versus mastectomy alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all IBR cases and all mastectomies without reconstruction from 2007 to 2011. Patient characteristics, operative details, and complication rates were reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: IBR was performed in 315 consecutive women; mastectomy alone was performed in 401 women. Patients undergoing mastectomy alone were more often older, diabetic, and more frequently underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation. Overall complications were higher in the IBR group, most commonly reoperation and delayed wound healing. In a multivariate analysis, IBR, increasing age, body mass index, history of radiation therapy, smoking, and nipple-sparing mastectomy were independently associated with increased risk of complications. However, IBR was only independently associated with increased risk of major complications such as reoperation or readmission for intravenous antibiotics, not minor complications. CONCLUSION: Patients selected for IBR are inherently different than those undergoing mastectomy alone. After adjusting for these differences, the increased risk of complications seen in IBR is moderately increased over the risk of complications in mastectomy alone. The observed increased risk of major complications after IBR is largely due to the aggressive management of complications in the setting of a prosthetic implant. IBR is a safe reconstructive strategy with only a slightly increased risk over mastectomy alone.

OBJECTIFS: Les techniques de reconstruction mammaire immédiate par implant sont courantes après une mastectomie. Des études antérieures ont démontré un taux de complication plus élevé après une reconstruction immédiate qu'après une reconstruction tardive. Les auteurs ont cherché à quantifier le risque supplémentaire de complications après une reconstruction mammaire immédiate (RMI) par rapport à une mastectomie effectuée seule. MATÉRIEL ET MÉTHODOLOGIE: Les auteurs ont procédé à une analyse rétrospective de toutes les RMI et de toutes les mastectomies sans reconstruction effectuées entre 2007 et 2011. Ils ont étudié et analysé les caractéristiques de patientes, les détails des opérations et le taux de complications. RÉSULTATS: Selon l'analyse, 315 femmes consécutives ont subi une RMI et 401 femmes, une mastectomie seule. Les patientes qui avaient subi une mastectomie seule étaient souvent plus âgées, diabétiques et soumises à une chimiothérapie néoadjuvante ou à une radiothérapie. Les complications globales étaient plus élevées dans le groupe ayant subi une RMI, surtout à cause d'une réopération et d'une guérison plus lente des plaies. D'après une analyse multivariée, la RMI, le vieillissement, l'indice de masse corporelle, des antécédents de radiothérapiele tabagisme et une mastectomie épargnant le mamelon présentaient une corrélation indépendante avec un risque accru de complications. La RMI présentait seulement une corrélation indépendante avec un risque accru de complications majeures comme une réopération ou une réhospitalisation visant à administrer des antibiotiques par voie intraveineuse, et non de complications mineures. CONCLUSION: Les patientes sélectionnées pour la RMI sont foncièrement différentes de celles qui subissent une mastectomie seule. Après rajustement pour tenir compte de ces différences, le risque de complications observé après une RMI est légèrement plus élevé que celui qui s'associe à une mastectomie seule. Le risque accru de complications majeures observé après une RMI est largement attribuable à la prise en charge énergique des complications après un implant prothétique. La RMI est une stratégie de reconstruction sécuritaire dont le risque est seulement un peu plus élevé que la mastectomie seule.

Nipple-Areola Complex Reconstruction.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand how to determine nipple-areola complex positioning on the reconstructed breast. 2. Understand the multitude of local flap and distant graft options for nipple-areola complex reconstruction. 3. Draw at least three fundamental nipple-areola complex reconstruction patterns. 4. Understand the forces that are responsible for flattening of the reconstructed papule. 5. Understand the current techniques used in secondary nipple-areola complex reconstructions. SUMMARY: Nipple-areola complex reconstruction and tattooing represent the final two stages of breast reconstruction. Nipple-areola complex reconstruction is typically accomplished with the use of local flaps, local flaps with augmentation grafts, or a combination thereof. Regardless of the technique used, however, all nipple-areola complex reconstructions lose a degree of projection over time. Options for secondary reconstruction include the use of local tissue flaps alone or in combination with acellular biological matrices.

Management of the Repeatedly Failed Cranioplasty Following Large Postdecompressive Craniectomy: Establishing the Efficacy of Staged Free Latissimus Dorsi Transfer/Tissue Expansion/Custom Polyetheretherketone Implant Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Postdecompressive craniotomy defect management following failed prior cranioplastyis challenging. The authors describe a staged technique utilizing free muscle transfer, tissue expansion, and custom polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants for the management of previously failed cranioplasty sites in patients with complicating local factors. METHODS: Consecutive patients with previously failed cranioplasties following large decompressive craniectomies underwent reconstruction of skull and soft tissue defects with staged free latissimus muscle transfer, tissue expansion, and placement of custom computer-aided design and modeling PEEK implants with a 'temporalis-plus' modification to minimize temporal hollowing. Implants were placed in a vascularized pocket at the third stage by elevating a plane between the previously transferred latissimus superficial fascia (left on the skin) and muscle (left on the dura/bone). Patients were evaluated postoperatively for cranioplasty durability, aesthetic outcome, and complications. RESULTS: Six patients with an average of 1.6 previously failed cranioplasties underwent this staged technique. Average age was 33 years. Average defect size was 139 cm. Average time to procedure series completion was 14.9 months. There were no flap failures. One patient had early postoperative incisional dehiscence following PEEK implant placement that was managed by immediate scalp flap readvancement. At 21.9 month average follow-up, there were no cranioplasty failures. Three patients (50%) underwent 4 subsequent refining outpatient procedures. All patients achieved complete coverage of their craniectomy defect site with hear-bearing skin, acceptable head shape, and normalized head contour. CONCLUSIONS: The described technique resulted in aesthetic, durable craniectomy defect reconstruction with retention of native hear-bearing scalp skin in a challenging patient population.

Comparison of Synthetic and Biologic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair Using Components Separation Technique.

Ventral hernia repair (VHR) for large abdominal wall defects is challenging. Prior research established that the use of mesh is superior to suture closure alone and that component separation is an effective technique to combat loss of abdominal domain. Studies comparing component separation technique (CST) outcomes utilizing synthetic versus biologic mesh are limited. A retrospective review was conducted of 72 consecutive patients who underwent VHR with CST between 2006 and 2010 at our institution. Surgeon preference and the presence of contamination guided whether synthetic mesh (27 patients) or biologic mesh (45 patients) was used. Mean follow-up interval for all comers was 13.9 months and similar in both groups (P > 0.05). Degree of contamination and severity of premorbid medical conditions were significantly higher in the biologic mesh group, as reflected in the higher Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) score (2.04 versus 2.86). Clinical outcomes, as measured by both minor and major complication rates and recurrence rates, were not significantly different. Minor complication rates were 26% in the synthetic group and 37% in the biologic group and major complication rates 15% in the synthetic group and 22% in the biologic group. There was 1 recurrence (4%) in the synthetic mesh group versus 5 (11%) in the biologic mesh group. Multivariable analysis for major complications revealed no significant difference for either synthetic or biologic mesh while controlling for other variables. Subset analysis of uncontaminated cases revealed recurrence rates of 4% in the synthetic mesh group and 6% in the biologic mesh group. VHR using CST and either synthetic mesh or biologic mesh resulted in low recurrence rates with similar overall complication profiles, despite the higher average VHWG grading score in the biologic mesh group. Our results support the VHWG recommendation for biologic mesh utilization in higher VHWG grade patients. In VHWG grade 2 patients, our clinical outcomes were similar, supporting the use of either type of mesh.

Comparison of vertical and oblique rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for pelvic, perineal, and groin reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Wound complications after perineal and groin obliterative procedures are a significant cause of morbidity, particularly following chemoradiation therapy. Vertical and, increasingly, oblique rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps have been used to fill potential dead space and bring healthy, vascularized tissue into the defect. The authors compared the complications and outcomes of patients undergoing perineal or groin reconstruction with vertical or oblique rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps. They hypothesized that the oblique flap offers outcomes similar to those of the vertical flap, without an increased risk of complications. METHODS: All patients who underwent immediate reconstruction of perineal, pelvic, or groin defects using vertical (n=49) or oblique rectus abdominis myocutaneous (n=22) flaps over the past 10 years at the University of Washington Medical Center were reviewed retrospectively. Patient, disease, and obliterative procedure characteristics and donor- and recipient-site complications were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using the t test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in major or minor donor- or recipient-site complication rates, need for augmented fascial closure, need for additional flaps, flap loss, readmission, or reoperation rate between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate reconstruction of perineal or groin defects with oblique rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps results in complication rates similar to those with reconstruction using with vertical flaps. Oblique flap reconstruction is a reasonable and safe alternative, providing several distinct advantages over the vertical flap, including greater arc of rotation, thinner skin paddle, less bulk, and limited fascial harvest. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Implantable Cook-Swartz Doppler probe versus Synovis Flow Coupler for the post-operative monitoring of free flap breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The Cook-Swartz Doppler has long been a trusted tool for close monitoring of blood flow after microvascular reconstruction; however, device implantation requires additional operating time. Synovis Life Technologies, Inc. received FDA approval in 2010 for the Flow Coupler, which combines an end-to-end anastomotic coupler with a removable 20 MHz Doppler, allowing both procedures to be performed simultaneously. However, its short history of widespread use necessitates further evaluation in the clinical setting. The authors studied the Synovis Flow Coupler in comparison to the more well-established Cook-Swartz Doppler for effectiveness and reliability in detection of vascular compromise. METHODS: The authors reviewed 220 free flap breast reconstructions in 150 patients over a three-year period in which either the Cook-Swartz Doppler or the Synovis Flow Coupler was implanted to monitor blood flow. Outcomes measured include false-positive or false-negative rates (FPR, FNR); rates of OR take-back and salvage; and flap survival. RESULTS: FPR was 1.0% for the Cook-Swartz Doppler and 1.9% for the Synovis Flow Coupler (p>0.05). FNR was 0.0% for both groups. Take-back rates were 10.1% for the Cook-Swartz, and 4.5% for Synovis (p>0.05). Flap failure rates were 1.8% and 0.9% for the Cook-Swartz and Synovis devices, respectively (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals no statistically significant differences in outcomes for free flap breast reconstruction where either the Cook-Swartz Doppler or the Synovis Flow Coupler was used to monitor blood flow to the perforator flap. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Comparison of outcomes using AlloDerm versus FlexHD for implant-based breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic reconstruction using human acellular dermis (ADM) is a common practice in breast reconstruction. AlloDerm and FlexHD are two different forms of ADM, each with unique characteristics. No studies have directly compared the postoperative complications of these 2 products. METHODS: The outcomes of 547 consecutive implant-based breast reconstructions were reviewed. RESULTS: Reconstruction was performed in 382 consecutive women (547 total breasts), employing mostly immediate reconstruction (81%). Mean follow-up was 6.4 months. Among immediate reconstructions, 165 used AlloDerm and 97 used FlexHD. Complications were similar by univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, smoking and higher initial implant fill were risk factors for delayed healing. The use of FlexHD, single-stage reconstruction, and smoking were independent risk factors for implant loss. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in the complication rates between AlloDerm and FlexHD in immediate breast reconstruction. Multivariate analysis suggests that FlexHD may be a risk factor for implant loss.

Clinical utility of CT angiography in DIEP breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: CT angiography has become the gold-standard imaging modality prior to DIEP flap breast reconstructions. Recent studies show excellent correlation between CTA and operative perforator location, but not their clinical significance. This study seeks to specifically evaluate the clinical utility of CTA in DIEP free flaps. METHODS: Preoperative CT angiography of the deep inferior epigastric system was obtained in 52 sequential DIEP free flaps involving 37 patients with dominant perforators marked by radiologist. Planned and used perforators were documented by the surgeon before and after the operation. RESULTS: A total of 62 out of 76 planned perforators were ultimately used (82%). Of those not used, 71% were abandoned due to inadequacy of preoperative CT. An additional 38 perforators were used that were not part of the initial preoperative plan, 60% of which were added due to inadequacy of the preoperative CT for planning. In total 23/52 flaps (44%) involved intraoperative changes due to features not appreciated on preoperative CT. CONCLUSION: CTA mapping of perforators prior to DIEP flap surgery increases surgeon confidence and reduces operative time; however, there are still a significant number of changes made based on clinical judgment. This study highlights the importance of surgeon review of CTA images. Caution is warranted in reliance on CTA mapping, and significant perforators should not be sacrificed until the anticipated perforator(s) have been exposed and evaluated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Duration of antibiotics after microsurgical breast reconstruction does not change surgical infection rate.

BACKGROUND: Infection rates for breast surgery are 3 to 15 percent, higher than average for a clean surgical procedure. Preoperative and postoperative antibiotics have lowered infection rates in other surgical groups, yet there is no consensus on postoperative prophylactic antibiotic use in microsurgical breast reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent autologous breast reconstruction between 2006 and 2009 was performed. Specific risk factors for autologous reconstruction were reviewed, including medical comorbidities, irradiation, and chemotherapy history. Data were collected on type and duration of prophylactic antibiotics. A prospective cohort of patients who received only 24 hours of postoperative antibiotics was identified. The incidence of surgical-site infections was measured using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. RESULTS: A total of 256 patients with 360 microvascular breast reconstructions who received both preoperative and postoperative prophylactic antibiotics were analyzed. The overall surgical-site infection rate was 17.2 percent (44 of 256 patients). Surgical-site infection was correlated with increased age, tobacco use, and prior radiation. Duration of postoperative antibiotic use did not differ in those patients who developed surgical-site infections (6.2 versus 7.7 days; p = 0.19). Eighty-two patients (32 percent) received only 24 hours of postoperative antibiotics, while 174 (68 percent) received more than 24 hours of antibiotics for a median duration of 10 days. There was no difference in the overall surgical-site infection rate in those who received more than 24 hours of antibiotics (19.5 versus 15.5 percent; p = 0.47). CONCLUSION: There was no reduction in the overall surgical-site infection rate among autologous breast reconstruction patients who received postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for more than 24 hours. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Social media in plastic surgery practices: emerging trends in North America.

BACKGROUND: Social media is a common term for web-based applications that offer a way to disseminate information to a targeted audience in real time. In the current market, many businesses are utilizing it to communicate with clients. Although the field of plastic surgery is constantly changing in response to innovative technologies introduced into the specialty, the utilization of social media in plastic surgery practices is currently unclear. OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluate the current attitudes and practices of aesthetic surgeons to emerging social media technology and compare these to attitudes about more traditional modes of communication. METHODS: A 19-question web-based survey was disseminated by e-mail to all board-certified or board-eligible American plastic surgeons (n = 4817). Respondents were asked to answer questions on three topics: (1) their use of social media in their personal and professional lives, (2) their various forms of practice marketing, and (3) their demographic information. RESULTS: There were 1000 responses (20.8%). Results showed that 28.2% of respondents used social media in their practice, while 46.7% used it in their personal life. Most plastic surgeons managed their social media themselves or through a staff member. The majority of respondents who used social media in their practice claimed that their efforts were directed toward patient referrals. The typical plastic surgery practice that used social media was a solo practice in a large city with a focus on cosmetic surgery. Local competition of plastic surgeons did not correlate with social media use. Most plastic surgeons (88%) advertised, but the form of marketing varied. The most common forms included websites, print, and search engine optimization, but other modalities, such as television, radio, and billboards, were still utilized. CONCLUSIONS: Social media represents a new avenue that many plastic surgeons are utilizing, although with trepidation. As social media becomes commonplace in society, its role in plastic surgery practice development and communication will become more prominent and defined.

Computed tomographic angiography in planning abdomen-based microsurgical breast reconstruction: a comparison with color duplex ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: To plan abdominal perforator-based microsurgical breast reconstruction, duplex ultrasound is often employed to preoperatively identify the location of abdominal wall perforating vessels. Recently, several groups have published the use of computed tomography angiography for preoperative planning in perforator flap breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of computed tomography angiography in locating clinically useful abdominal wall perforators with that of duplex ultrasound. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted of 22 consecutive patients undergoing 30 abdomen-based microsurgical breast reconstructions using both preoperative computed tomography angiography and duplex ultrasound. Perforator data were obtained with both computed tomography angiography and ultrasound. The two largest perforators were chosen per abdominal side for comparison between studies. In addition, the locations of perforators were confirmed at surgery. RESULTS: Computed tomography angiography preoperatively identified 83 of the largest perforators, while only 55 of these large perforators (66.3 percent) were preoperatively identified on ultrasound. No superficial inferior epigastric arteries were identified by ultrasound. However, in all eight breast reconstructions performed with the superficial inferior epigastric system, the superficial inferior epigastric arteries were identified preoperatively as adequate size for microsurgical transfers, with an average diameter of 1.6 mm. CONCLUSIONS: There are many advantages to preoperative computed tomography angiography for planning abdominal perforator-based microsurgical breast reconstruction, including accurate identification of perforating vessels, the underlying branching pattern of the deep inferior epigastric artery, and the presence of the superficial inferior epigastric vessels. This study demonstrates the superiority of computed tomography angiography over duplex ultrasound as a tool for preoperative planning of perforator-based breast reconstruction.

Quantifying tissue level ischemia: hypoxia response element-luciferase transfection in a rabbit ear model.

Ischemia is a common underlying factor in a number of pathologic conditions ranging from cardiac dysfunction to delayed wound healing. Previous efforts have shown the resulting hypoxia activates the hypoxia inducible factor, a transcription factor with signaling effects through an intranuclear hypoxia response element (HRE). We hypothesized that ischemic conditions should activate these hypoxic signaling pathways in a measurable manner. We tested our hypothesis using variations of an established rabbit ear ischemic wound model and an HRE-luciferase-reporter gene construct. This plasmid construct was transfected into the ears of young, female New Zealand White rabbits, harvested at day 7 and processed to yield a reactive solution. Luminometry was used to quantify luciferase expression in each solution as a marker for HRE activation in each wound. Quantitative readings of hypoxic signaling as measured by luminescence yielded profound and statistically significant differences between the various ischemic models. Our results suggest that the biologic systems for hypoxic signaling can be used to detect local ischemia. HRE-luciferase transfection is an effective tool for quantifying the degree of tissue hypoxia. The caudal ischemic rabbit ear model showed significantly higher levels of hypoxia. Use of a validated model that produces sufficient tissue levels of hypoxia is recommended for meaningful study of ischemic wound healing.

Patient body mass index and perforator quality in abdomen-based free-tissue transfer for breast reconstruction.

Body mass index (BMI) must be considered when selecting patients suitable for abdomen-based microsurgical breast reconstruction. It is unknown whether BMI or age affects quality or quantity of abdominal wall perforating blood vessels. The purpose of this study was to identify differences in abdominal wall perforating blood vessels among patients with different BMI and age. A retrospective review was conducted of 66 patients undergoing abdomen-based microsurgical breast reconstruction tissue transfer from 2000 to 2006. Median age was 48.6 years (+/- 8.2). Patients were divided into BMI < 25 (28 patients), BMI 25 to 30 (26 patients), or BMI > 30 (12 patients). Perforator size and location was determined by ultrasound data. There was a greater number of perforators in horizontal zone II compared with the remaining zones (P < 0.05, Bonferroni corrected). There were no differences between age or BMI and the number of perforators or average perforator size per patient. A significant positive linear association was found between the average perforator diameter and total number of abdominal wall perforators. We concluded there is no anatomical difference in perforator quality among patients with varying BMIs

Reconstruction of the pelvic floor and perineum with human acellular dermal matrix and thigh flaps following pelvic exenteration.

BACKGROUND: Patients who undergo pelvic floor resection as treatment for recurrent cancer following radiation therapy have increased rates of complications, particularly if permanent prosthetic mesh is used for reconstruction. Human acellular dermal matrix (HADM), commonly used for reconstruction in other torso locations, is associated with lower rates of complications (including infection, adhesions and cutaneous exposure) than synthetic mesh. We describe an effective technique to reconstruct the pelvic floor and perineum with HADM and thigh-based flaps following pelvic exenteration and radical vulvectomy. CASE: A 75-year-old woman underwent radical resection of the pelvic floor and perineum to treat recurrent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma and osteoradionecrosis. The pelvic floor and perineal soft tissue defect were reconstructed with HADM (AlloDerm; LifeCell Corporation, Branchburg, NJ) and bilateral, thigh-based tissue flaps, respectively. Despite a large resection, previous irradiation therapy and bacterial contamination the wounds healed without complications. CONCLUSION: Reconstruction of pelvic floor defects using HADM is an option when wound conditions are unfavorable for the use of permanent prosthetic meshes.