ABSTRACT
Background Bedside management and outcomes of rectal foreign bodies remain challenging due to the presentation and complexity of the inserted objects. Injuries, such as perforation of the colon and rectum, are among the most commonly reported complications. However, prior studies are unclear regarding the setting in which the complication rates may be minimized. This study aimed to assess whether there was a statistically significant difference among the various extraction methods with regard to complications in the emergency department and operating room. Materials and methods This was a retrospective study of all cases of rectal foreign bodies that were removed in the emergency department at a large county hospital between 1/1/2010 and 12/31/2020. Patients included in this study were adults who were evaluated and treated in the emergency department. Results A total of 78 patients were included in the final analysis. More than half (51.3%, n=40) of the patients were successfully treated in the emergency department. Compared with the emergency department, patients in the operating room were more likely to undergo exploratory laparotomy and colectomy (0% vs. 31.6%, p<0.0001), undergo general anesthesia (84.2% vs. 0%, p<0.0001), have higher complication rates (21% vs. 0%, p=0.0021), and have a longer hospital length of stay (median=1 vs. 0, p<0.0001). Conclusion This study revealed a >50% success rate of rectal foreign body removal in the emergency department without any reported complications. To improve the success rate of bedside retrieval and decrease complications, physicians need to be vigilant, communicative, and compassionate about their evaluations and clinical methodology.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Decompressive hemicraniectomies have been the mainstay of treating medically refractory elevated intracranial pressures (ICPs). Afterward, ICP continues to be monitored. However, the reliability of monitoring the ICP in a patient after craniectomy has been shown to be variable, at best. We propose the use of a durometer to investigate a temporal relationship between skin turgor and elevated ICP. Methods Patients were included via the following criteria: age >18 and unilateral decompressive craniectomy, with an external ventricular drain (EVD) in place. Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18, underwent bilateral decompressive craniectomy, or did not have an ICP monitor. Skin turgor over the skin flap was measured with a durometer over the center of the defect. ICPs were monitored using an EVD. The optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) was measured with ultrasound with the eye closed and Tegaderm (3M, Saint Paul, MN) covering the eyelid. The optic nerve was measured 3 mm behind the globe, and the diameter of the optic nerve at the widest point was recorded. The Neurological Pupil index (NPi) was recorded with a pupillometer. Results Fourteen patients were included, with over 100 data points for ICP, skin turgor, ONSD, and NPi. Five patients went on to have elevated ICP after decompressive hemicraniectomy. The correlation coefficient (R) for ONSD to ICP correlation was 0.62. The R for ICP to skin turgor was 0.31. The data shows that a skin turgor of >9 is related to increasing ICP within 24 hours, a skin turgor of 6-9 is a warning, and a skin turgor of <6 is normal. Conclusion A temporal relationship between skin turgor and ICP exists, which could be used to predict impending elevations in ICP sooner than an ICP monitor can determine. By using this in conjunction with traditional methods of evaluating these patients, we could sooner act on elevations in ICP and potentially improve outcomes.
