Prospective randomized trial of bilateral carotid endarterectomies: primary closure versus patching.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although several studies have compared the results of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with primary closure (PC) versus patch closure, none have compared the outcome of bilateral CEAs with patch versus PC performed on the same patient. This prospective randomized study compares the clinical outcome and incidence of recurrent stenosis (>/=80%) for CEA with PC versus patch closure in patients with bilateral CEAs. METHODS: This study includes 74 patients with bilateral CEAs with PC on one side and patching on the other. Patients were randomized to sequential operative treatment of either patching/PC or PC/patching. Postoperative duplex ultrasounds and clinical follow-up were done at 1, 6, and 12 months and every year thereafter. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the risk of significant restenosis (>/=80%). RESULTS: Demographic characteristics and the mean operative diameter of the internal carotid artery were similar for both PC and patching. The mean follow-up was 29 months (range, 6 to 65 months). The incidence of ipsilateral stroke was 4% for PC versus 0% for patching. PC had a significantly higher incidence of neurological complications (transient ischemic attacks and stroke combined) than patching (12% versus 1%; P=0.02). Operative mortality was 0%. PC had a higher incidence of recurrent stenosis (22% versus 1%; P<0.003) and total internal carotid artery occlusion (8% versus 0%; P=0.04) than patching. Restenoses necessitating a repeated CEA were also higher for PC (14%) than for patching (1%; P=0.01). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patching had a significantly better cumulative patency rate than PC (P<0.01). This analysis also showed that freedom from recurrent stenosis at 24 months was 75% for PC and 98% for patching. CONCLUSIONS: Patch closure is less likely than PC to cause ipsilateral stroke, transient ischemic attacks, and recurrent carotid stenosis. The higher rate of unilateral recurrent stenosis may suggest that local factors play a more significant role than systemic factors in the etiology of recurrent carotid stenosis.

Prospective randomized trial of carotid endarterectomy with primary closure and patch angioplasty with saphenous vein, jugular vein, and polytetrafluoroethylene: long-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: This study examines the long-term clinical outcome and the incidence of recurrent stenosis (> or = 50%) after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with primary closure (PC) versus vein patch closure (VPC), saphenous (SVP), and jugular vein (JVP) and polytetrafluoroethylene patch closure (PTFE-P). METHODS: A total of 399 CEAs were randomized into the following groups: 135 PC, 134 PTFE-P, and 130 VPC (SVP alternating with JVP). Postoperative duplex ultrasound scans were performed at 1, 6, and 12 months and every year thereafter. The mean follow-up was 30 months with a range of 1 to 62 months, and demographic characteristics were similar in all groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the risk of restenosis and the stroke-free survival. RESULTS: The incidence of ipsilateral stroke was 5% (seven of 135) for PC, 1% (one of 134) for PTFE-P, and 0% for VPC (PC vs VPC, p = 0.008; PC vs PTFE-P, p = 0.034). Seven strokes occurred in the perioperative period. All three groups had similar mortality rates. The cumulative stroke-free survival rate at 48 months was 82% for PC, 84% for PTFE-P, and 88% for VPC (p < 0.01 for PC vs PTFE-P or VPC). PC had a higher incidence of recurrent stenosis and occlusion (34%) than PTFE-P (2%) and VPC (9%) (SVP 9%, JVP 8%) (p < 0.001). PTFE-P had a lower recurrent stenosis rate than VPC (p < 0.045). Restenoses necessitating a redo CEA were also higher for PC (11%) than for PTFE-P (1%) and VPC (2%) (p < 0.001). Women with PC had a higher recurrent stenosis rate than men (46% vs 23%, p = 0.008). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that freedom from recurrent stenosis at 48 months was 47% for PC, 84% for VPC, and 96% for PTFE-P (p < 0.001). The SVP and JVP results were comparable. The mean operative diameter of the internal carotid artery was similar in patients with or without restenosis. Significantly more late internal carotid artery dilatations occurred in the VPC group compared with the PC group. CONCLUSIONS: Patch closure (VPC or PTFE-P) is less likely than PC to cause perioperative stroke. Patching was also superior in lowering the incidence of late recurrent stenoses, especially in women.

Role of venous duplex imaging of the lower extremities in patients with fever of unknown origin.

BACKGROUND: Although a fever of unknown origin (FUO) is most often due to other causes, the few caused by pulmonary emboli, pelvic thrombophlebitis, or lower extremity venous thrombosis (DVT) present a diagnostic challenge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of venous duplex imaging of the lower extremity in evaluating a large series of patients with FUO. This has not been reported previously in the English-language literature. METHODS: Medical records were analyzed of patients with FUO who were referred to the vascular laboratory for venous duplex imaging of the lower extremities to rule out DVT as a cause of their fever. A FUO was defined as a temperature of greater than 38.3 degrees C on several occasions for at least 3 weeks' duration that defied 1 week of hospital evaluation. DVT was considered as a probable cause of FUO if the following criteria were met: (1) a positive venous duplex image for acute DVT, (2) subsequent fever resolution within 7 days of anticoagulation therapy, and (3) a fever that was resistant to prior treatment. RESULTS: A total of 114 duplex examinations, gathered during a 2-year period, were analyzed. The 89 patients had a mean age of 58 years. Infections were the most common cause of FUO (57 of 89, 64%), and unknown causes constituted 19%. There were seven cases of DVT (8%), five (6%) of whom met the criteria for probable cause of FUO. The overall cost of venous duplex imaging examinations was $51,300 ($450 x 114 tests), with an average cost of $10,260 for each case of DVT detected as probable cause of FUO. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the literature, infections remain the most common cause of FUO; however, DVT was found to be a more common cause of FUO in our present series (6%). The cost of venous duplex imaging of the lower extremities in establishing DVT as a probable cause of FUO should be borne in mind when the work-up of these patients is planned.

Deep vein thrombosis as probable cause of fever of unknown origin.

A rare patient may have fever of unknown origin (FUO) that is caused by pulmonary emboli, pelvic, or lower extremity venous thrombosis (DVT). This study reviews our experience treating patients with DVT that presented with a FUO over a two-year period. A FUO was defined as a temperature of greater than 38.4 degrees C on several occasions for at least three weeks duration that defied one week of hospital evaluation. DVT was considered as a probable cause of FUO if the following criteria were met: (1) a positive venous duplex image for acute DVT, (2) subsequent fever resolution within seven days of anticoagulation therapy. Five out of 89 patients (6%) met this criteria. Their mean age was 53 years. Four patients had iliofemoral DVT and one had femoropopliteal DVT. Two had lung scans, one was positive for pulmonary embolism, and the other was equivocal. All five patients responded to heparin therapy and their temperatures returned to normal within a few days. Venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism should thus be borne in mind when patients with FUO are being evaluated.

Prospective randomized trial of carotid endarterectomy with primary closure and patch angioplasty with saphenous vein, jugular vein, and polytetrafluoroethylene: perioperative (30-day) results.

PURPOSE: The early outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with primary closure (PC) versus vein patch closure (saphenous vein [SVP] and jugular vein [JVP]) and polytetrafluoroethylene patch closure (PTFE-PC) were compared. METHODS: Three hundred ninety-nine CEAs were randomized into the following groups: 135 PC, 134 PTFE-PC, and 130 vein patch closure (SVP alternating with JVP). Surviving patients underwent a carotid color duplex ultrasonographic scan 1 month after surgery. Demographic characteristics were similar in all groups. RESULTS: The incidence of perioperative cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) was 4.4% for PC, 0.8% for PTFE-PC, and 0% for vein patch closure (PC vs vein patch, p = 0.0165; PC vs all patching [vein and PTFE], p = 0.007). The perioperative CVA and reversible ischemic neurologic deficit (RIND) combined rates for all patching were superior to PC (1.5% vs 5.2%; p = 0.04). These combined rates were also superior for vein patch closure when compared with PC (0.8% vs 5.2%; p = 0.037). The mean diameter of the internal carotid artery was similar in patients who had perioperative neurologic deficits and those who did not. After 1 month of follow-up, 11.9% of the PC arteries were narrowed 50% or more in contrast to 2.3% for PTFE-PC, 3.1% for SVP, and 10.3% for JVP.