ABSTRACT
We retrospectively analysed the outcome of consecutive children with idiopathic severe aplastic anaemia in the United Kingdom who received immunosuppressive therapy (IST) or matched unrelated donor (MUD) haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The 6-month cumulative response rate following rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG)/ciclosporin (IST) was 32·5% (95% CI 19·3-46·6) (n = 43). The 5-year estimated failure-free survival (FFS) following IST was 13·3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4·0-27·8). In contrast, in 44 successive children who received a 10-antigen (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DQB1) MUD HSCT there was an excellent estimated 5-year FFS of 95·01% (95% CI 81·38-98·74). Forty of these children had failed IST previously. HSCT conditioning was a fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and alemtuzumab (FCC) regimen and did not include radiotherapy. There were no cases of graft failure. Median donor chimerism was 100% (range 88-100%). A conditioning regimen, such as FCC that avoids total body irradiation is ideally suited in children. Our data suggest that MUD HSCT following IST failure offers an excellent outcome and furthermore, if a suitable MUD can be found quickly, MUD HSCT may be a reasonable alternative to IST.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Aplastic/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Unrelated Donors , Adolescent , Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Infant , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Opportunistic Infections/etiology , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation Chimera , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Treatment Failure , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mucopolysaccharidosis type I is caused by deficiency of α-L-iduronidase. Currently available treatment options include an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant and enzyme replacement therapy. Exogenous enzyme therapy appears promising but the benefits may be attenuated, at least in some patients, by the development of an immune response to the delivered enzyme. The incidence and impact of alloimmune responses in these patients remain unknown. DESIGN AND METHODS: We developed an immunoglobulin G enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as well as in vitro catalytic enzyme inhibition and cellular uptake inhibition assays and quantified enzyme inhibition by allo-antibodies. We determined the impact of these antibodies in eight patients who received enzyme therapy before and during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In addition, 20 patients who had previously received an allogeneic stem cell transplant were tested to evaluate this treatment as an immune tolerance induction mechanism. RESULTS: High titer immune responses were seen in 87.5% (7/8) patients following exposure to α-L-iduronidase. These patients exhibited catalytic enzyme inhibition (5/8), uptake inhibition of catalytically active enzyme (6/8) or both (4/8). High antibody titers generally preceded elevation of previously described biomarkers of disease progression. The median time to development of immune tolerance was 101 days (range, 26-137) after transplantation. All 20 patients, including those with mixed chimerism (22%), tested 1 year after transplantation were tolerized despite normal enzyme levels. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high incidence of neutralizing antibodies in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I treated with enzyme replacement therapy. We also found that allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was an effective and rapid immune tolerance induction strategy.
