Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Indian J Gastroenterol ; 37(5): 424-429, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30178092

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) occurs in decompensated liver disease and carries high mortality. Vasoconstrictors are the drug of choice. Terlipressin is widely used and is expensive. In this study, we compared noradrenaline and terlipressin in the management of type 1 HRS. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients with type 1 HRS were managed with noradrenaline (Group A, n = 30) or terlipressin (Group B, n = 30) with albumin in a randomized controlled trial at a tertiary center. RESULTS: Reversal of type 1 HRS was achieved in 16 (53%) patients in group A and 17 (57%) in group B. There was statistically insignificant difference between the two groups in decreasing serum creatinine and increasing urine output (p > 0.05). On univariate analysis, Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score, serum sodium, serum urea, serum albumin, prothrombin time, International normalized ratio (INR), serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), ascitic fluid protein, and history of bleeding were associated with response to treatment (noradrenaline/terlipressin). However, on multivariate analysis, only baseline CTP score, serum urea, serum albumin, and prothrombin time were independent predictors of response. All patients who responded were discharged alive with no mortality within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in outcome of patients with type 1 HRS treated with noradrenaline or terlipressin. Thus, noradrenaline, which is cheaper, can be used instead of terlipressin (Clinical Trials Registry-India [CTRI] No. CTRI/2011/09/002032).


Subject(s)
Hepatorenal Syndrome/drug therapy , Norepinephrine/therapeutic use , Terlipressin/therapeutic use , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Albumins/therapeutic use , Creatinine/blood , Female , Hepatorenal Syndrome/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
2.
Indian J Gastroenterol ; 32(3): 190-4, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23515980

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increasing resistance against Helicobacter pylori has resulted in reduced eradication rates. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine whether eradication rates for H. pylori infection with sequential therapy is better than standard triple therapy. PATIENTS: Patients with endoscopy documented peptic ulcer and H. pylori infection confirmed by histology and rapid urease test. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized into two groups; 134 received standard triple therapy (pantoprazole 40 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxicillin 1 g each administered twice daily) for 10 days and 138 received sequential regimen (pantoprazole 40 mg plus amoxicillin 1 g twice daily for 5 days followed by 40 mg pantoprazole, 500 mg clarithromycin, and 500 mg tinidazole each administered twice daily for 5 days). Eradication was confirmed by histology and rapid urease test. Compliance and adverse effects were determined by the recovery of empty medicine strips and questioning. RESULTS: The eradication rates with sequential therapy were significantly greater than with standard therapy on both intention-to-treat analysis (76.0 % vs. 61.9 %, p = 0.005; difference, 14.1 % [95 % CI, 6.5-19 %] and per protocol analysis (84.6 % vs. 67.4 %, p = 0.002; difference, 17.2 % [95 % CI, 8.5-23.5 %]). The incidence of side effects did not differ between the two therapy groups. One patient in standard therapy discontinued treatment due to side effects. LIMITATION: Cultures were not performed. Loss to follow up was 5.2 % in standard therapy and 6.5 % in sequential therapy. CONCLUSION: Sequential therapy was significantly more effective than standard therapy for eradicating H. pylori infection in peptic ulcer disease in Asian patients. Side effects were similar.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Ulcer Agents/administration & dosage , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Helicobacter pylori/isolation & purification , Adult , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Helicobacter Infections/epidemiology , Helicobacter Infections/microbiology , Humans , Incidence , India/epidemiology , Male , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Indian J Gastroenterol ; 32(5): 291-6, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23512211

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is increased in patients of cancer with increased mortality. Multiple transfusions of blood and blood-related products are a potential source. AIMS: This study aims to assess the incidence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroconversion in cancer patients receiving transfusion of blood or blood-related products and identify possible reasons for infection in these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients of cancer receiving blood products, who were HBsAg-, anti-hepatitis B core (HBc)-, and HBV DNA-negative prior to transfusion, were tested for HBsAg by ELISA at 6, 12, and 24 weeks after the last transfusion. Blood donors were screened for HBsAg by ELISA. RESULTS: Twenty of 3,600 (0.56 %) blood donors tested positive for HBsAg and were rejected. Nine of 150 (6 %) cancer patients became HBsAg-positive posttransfusion which included seven patients who presented with acute hepatitis B and other two patients who remained HBsAg-positive without hepatitis. In 6/9 (66.6 %) patients, HBsAg positivity was related to blood transfusion as their corresponding blood donors on retesting the stored samples were positive for anti-HBc antibody and HBV DNA. In other three patients, the cause of their HBsAg positivity could not be ascertained. CONCLUSION: Occult HBV infection in blood donors is a potential source of posttransfusion HBV infection in recipients. Anti-HBc antibody and HBV DNA should be tested in blood donors especially when blood is given to cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Neoplasms/therapy , Transfusion Reaction , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Blood Safety , Child , DNA, Viral/blood , Female , Hepatitis B/immunology , Hepatitis B/transmission , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/blood , Hepatitis B virus/genetics , Hepatitis B virus/immunology , Humans , Incidence , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Young Adult
4.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 28(5): 808-13, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23432600

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection has regional variation. Effect of eradication of H. pylori on symptoms of functional dyspepsia is uncertain, and the data in Asian scenario are scanty. The study aimed to see H. pylori positivity rate in patients of functional dyspepsia and the effect of its eradication on symptoms. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was the study design used. Patients of functional dyspepsia defined as per Rome 2 criteria were tested for H. pylori infection by rapid urease test and gastric biopsy. H. pylori-positive patients were randomly allocated to triple therapy (20 mg of omeprazole, 500 mg of clarithromycin, and 1000 mg of amoxicillin orally two times daily) and omeperazole plus identical placebo for 2 weeks. Symptoms were assessed with the weekly Likert scale. RESULTS: H. pylori positivity rate in functional dyspepsia was 1160/2000 (58%). At 6 weeks, the eradication rate for H. pylori in triple therapy and placebo group was (181/259 [69.8%] and 13/260 [5.0%], P = 0.001), respectively. On intention-to-treat analysis, the symptom resolution at 1 month was (157/259 [60.7%] and 136/260 [52.3%], P = 0.38), respectively. At 12 months, H. pylori eradication and healing of gastritis in triple therapy and placebo group were (116/174 [66.7%] and 12/180 [6.7%], P = 0.001) and (132/174 [75.9%] and 11/180 [6.1%], P = 0.001), respectively. On intension to treat, the resolution of symptoms in triple therapy and placebo group was (95/217 [43.7%] and 72/195 [36.9%], P = 0.13). CONCLUSION: There is high H. pylori positivity rate in patients of functional dyspepsia. The eradication of H. pylori does not resolve the symptoms despite healing of gastritis.


Subject(s)
Dyspepsia/epidemiology , Dyspepsia/physiopathology , Gastroenteritis/epidemiology , Gastroenteritis/microbiology , Helicobacter Infections , Helicobacter pylori , Adult , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Dyspepsia/etiology , Female , Gastroenteritis/complications , Gastroenteritis/drug therapy , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Young Adult
5.
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl ; 22(6): 1187-92, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22089779

ABSTRACT

To determine the incidence of acute renal failure (ARF) and nephrosonographic findings among asphyxiated neonates, and to correlate this with uric acid levels and the severity of hypoxic encephalopathy, we studied 80 full-term appropriate-for-date singleton neonates with perinatal asphyxia, and 30 healthy full-term neonates as controls from March 2006 to February 2007. A detailed history, thorough clinical examination along with investigations, including urine examination, 24-h urine collection, ultrasonography of abdomen and cranium, serum electrolytes, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, and serum uric acid were obtained. ARF developed in 45% (36/80) of the asphyxiated neonates. Forty-eight (60%) neonates showed significant elevation of blood urea and 41 (51.3%) neonates had significant elevation of serum creatinine than the control group (P < 0.001). Sixty-two (77.5%) neonates developed significant elevation of serum uric acid levels, and nephrosonography revealed hyperechogenicity in all of them, while only two among the healthy neonates showed the raised uric acid levels (P < 0.001). Nonoliguric renal failure was seen 28/36 (77.8%) of the neonates with ARF, whereas eight (22.2%) neonates had oliguric renal failure. Eight (27.8%) patients among ARF patients maintained abnormal biochemical parameters after 2 weeks, and of whom four patients died after variable lengths of time with a mortality rate of 11.11%. Kidneys are the most common organs involved in perinatal asphyxia, and uric acid might be a causative factor for failure in addition to hypoxic insult. Routine use of kidney function test, along with abdominal ultrasonography form an important screening tool to detect any additional morbidity in these patients.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/diagnostic imaging , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Asphyxia Neonatorum/epidemiology , Acute Kidney Injury/physiopathology , Comorbidity , Creatinine/blood , Humans , Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain/blood , Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain/classification , Infant, Newborn , Kidney/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Function Tests , Male , Ultrasonography , Uric Acid/blood
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...