Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mil Med ; 2022 Jan 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35043959

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Military sexual trauma (MST) has been a concern within our U.S. military for many years. Many interventions have been found to benefit this population, although meaning-based interventions are still lacking in this area. The purpose of this phenomenological study is to understand the meaning-making process and themes that arise for female military veterans as they narrate their experience(s) of MST. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The qualitative study consisted of six female participants, from different areas across the nation, who all reported experiencing MST during their time in service. Their experiences of MST included both sexual harassment and sexual assault. Participants completed a semi-structured interview that was analyzed using an axial coding method to discover the major themes of each participant's interview. The participants discussed the positive and negative aspects of their journey following their MST experience(s). This study's procedures were approved by Adler University's Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: Many found the interview to be a healing experience on their path of post-traumatic growth (PTG). There were eight major themes that arose from the data analysis under the three main domains of (1) creating a work or doing a deed, (2) experiencing something or encountering someone in a way to produce PTG, and (3) altering one's attitude toward unavoidable suffering. The eight themes were as follows: advocacy, adaptive coping, sense of family unit, psychological clarity, meaningful mantra, survivor mentality code, view of self in the world, and resiliency. CONCLUSIONS: All participants endorsed engagement in some type of activity that fell into one of the three major domains identified above. This finding helped highlight the PTG that participants were able to experience through their meaning-making journey. There were several recommendations and study implications that were derived from this research study. With the themes introduced from this study, future treatment planning for individual survivors of MST can be better informed by the utilization of meaning-making techniques. Family and group meaning-based interventions would also be an area of continued exploration for this population. Future implications for practice are also included within this article. Significant limitations of the study include amount of participants, lack of diversity in sample population, qualitative study results, and lack of a more-personal interviewing process.

2.
Clin Neuropsychol ; 32(6): 1039-1053, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29283307

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Among embedded performance validity tests (PVTs), little research addresses the use of Total Hits and Total False Positives from the California Verbal Learning Test, Second Edition (CVLT-II) in spite of low sensitivity, particularly in psychiatric samples. METHOD: This study examined the classification accuracy of these two measures in individuals with psychiatric disorders or mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI). These samples were separated into two groups using the criteria of passing all PVTs versus failing 2 or more PVTs. They were also compared to a criterion group of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (M-STBI) patients who passed all PVTs. The sample included 176 individuals consecutively referred for neuropsychological testing (mean age = 46.31, SD = 15.30; mean education = 13.07, SD = 2.50, 52.3% males; 91.2% Caucasian) who met study criteria. RESULTS: For classification accuracy, Total Hits in the psychiatric group had excellent classification accuracy (Area Under the Curve [AUC] = .82; Sensitivity = .47; Specificity = .90), whereas Total False Positives (AUC = .49) demonstrated poor classification accuracy. The MTBI group had similar results, with Total Hits having excellent classification accuracy (AUC = .88; Sensitivity = .60; Specificity = .90), whereas Total False Positive (AUC = .62) did not. CONCLUSIONS: Results provide preliminary support for using Total Hits; however, Total False Positives were ineffective in identifying non-credible patients with psychiatric disorders or MTBI. Total Hits also compared favorably to other embedded CVLT measures.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic/diagnosis , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/psychology , Memory and Learning Tests/standards , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/psychology , Psychomotor Performance , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Reproducibility of Results , Self Concept , Verbal Learning/physiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...