Lower extremity strength and power are associated with 400-meter walk time in older adults: The InCHIANTI study.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that lower extremity muscle power is more important for physical function in older adults compared to strength, and that there is a nonlinear relationship between power or strength and physical function that might be indicative of a threshold above which the association between muscle function and physical function is no longer evident. This study examined the association between lower extremity strength or power with the time to complete a 400-meter walk, and attempted to identify thresholds within the relationship. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of a sample of 384 females and 336 males aged > or = 65 years from the InCHIANTI study ("Invecchiare in Chianti," i.e., Aging in the Chianti Area) was conducted. Measures included 400-meter walk time, lower extremity strength and power, comorbidities, and sociodemographic variables (age, gender, height, education, cognitive function, depression). RESULTS: Linear regression models showed that both lower extremity strength and power were significant predictors of 400-meter walk time, although power explained marginally more of the variance in 400-meter walk time. Quadratic models of lower extremity strength and power fit the data slightly better than the linear models. Regardless of gender, comorbidities, or normalization scheme for strength and power, the curvilinear form of the relationship between strength or power and 400-meter walk time remained the same. CONCLUSIONS: Lower extremity muscle strength and power are both important predictors of the 400-meter walk time. Although curvilinear relationships existed between muscle strength and power and the 400-meter walk time, the data do not indicate a clear threshold for either strength or power above which the performance in the 400-meter walk test plateaus.

Exercise prescription using resting heart rate plus 20 or perceived exertion in cardiac rehabilitation.

PURPOSE: For patients starting a cardiac rehabilitation program, exercise intensity often is set 20 beats per minute above the standing resting heart rate (RHR+20) or in a range of 11 to 13 on Borg's Scale for Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE 11-13). The purpose of this study was to determine the actual exercise intensity, expressed as a percentage of peak oxygen uptake reserve (%VO2R) using these techniques. METHODS: For this study, 11 new referrals to a phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation program voluntarily underwent a symptom-limited exercise test and a field test that consisted of self-paced over-the-ground walking for 10 minutes at levels corresponding to RPE 11-13 and RHR+20. During both tests, gas exchange data were obtained via the Cosmed K4b and heart rate via the Polar monitor. RESULTS: The mean %VO2R at RHR+20 (41.8 +/- 12.3%) and RPE 11-13 (71 +/- 15.3% mL.kg.min) were significantly different. Exercise at RHR+20 resulted in 4 of the 11 patients (36%) exercising at less than 40% VO2R, 6 of the patients (55%) exercising at 40% to 60% VO2R, and 1 of the patients (9%) exercising at more than 60% VO2R. Exercise at RPE 11-13 resulted in 1 of the 11 patients (9%) exercising at less than 40% VO2R, 1 of the patients at exercising at 40% to 60% VO2R (9%), and 9 of the patients (82%) exercising at more than 60% VO2R. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that using RHR+20 or RPE 11-13 to prescribe exercise intensity during over-the-ground walking for phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation patients results in substantial intersubject variability and raises questions about the safety and efficacy of these approaches.