[Decision-making process and evaluation of public health interventions]. / Démarche décisionnelle et évaluation des interventions de santé publique.

OBJECTIVE: We have designed a methodological framework for experts involved in the support of decision-making in public health interventions. METHODS: The methodological framework consists of four elements: 1) A series of nine questions, formulated in non-technical terms, relevant to assessment of the usefulness of an intervention, at a given time in a given context; 2) Translation of these questions into concepts related to the evaluation of interventions (definition of the intervention, its target and objective, potential and actual effectiveness, safety, efficiency, and equity); 3) Logical organization of the information needed to address and answer the questions; and 4) An algorithm to translate the available information into recommendations on the real usefulness of the intervention in the context in which the questions were raised. RESULTS: Each step is illustrated by questions raised about road safety interventions, screening, blood transfusion and measures proposed during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: Decision-making can be facilitated if experts provide decision-makers with a formal summary of the strengths and weaknesses of existing knowledge, based on an analysis of all facets of an intervention's potential usefulness.

[Evaluation of the effects of a complex intervention]. / Évaluation des effets d'une intervention complexe.

Appraising the effects of a complex intervention is one step in a more broadly based research process, from the construction or modelling of the intervention to its actual deployment. It consists in measuring the effectiveness or impact of the intervention, i.e. analyzing its capacity to produce change. The aim of this article is to obtain unbiased measurement of the average effects of an intervention, based on a panel of predetermined parameters and on the assumption of a causal link between the intervention and the measured result. This article is consequently devoted to evaluation of the effects of a complex intervention and focuses on the methodological challenges of its three key stages : 1) modelling of the intervention and feasibility analysis, essential prerequisites ; 2) the choice of study design and of the effects to be measured, that is to say the methodological premises ; and 3) process analysis, carried out in parallel with the evaluation of effects, leading to an indispensable appraisal of the intervention implementation and of the context into which it is integrated. The article is illustrated by five intervention impact assessment projects. A specific objective when evaluating the effects of a complex intervention consists in (a) moving away from a simple search for causality involving the intervention and its effects and (b) toward understanding of the effectiveness mechanisms, once again taking into account the context and the actual conditions of implementation. The challenge is to embrace rather than limit the complexity of the intervention, this being an essential prerequisite for its successful deployment and eventual generalization.

Alert on elongated in-hospital acute stroke management delays. An Aquitain cohort study.

The objectives were to analyze changes from 2012 to 2017 in different management times of stroke patients included in the Aquitaine stroke Observatory (ObA2). The studied times (onset-to-needle time-ONT, onset-to-door time-ODT, door-to-imaging time-DIT, door-to-needle time-DNT and imaging-to-needle time-INT) were described as median, interquartile ranges and proportion of patients within the recommended median time goals (ODT under 4hours, DIT within 20min; for thrombolyzed patients, DIT under 20min and a ONT under 4:30) to be compared with an objective of 50% of patients within said time goal. Globally, ODT was 160min, with 43.6% to 59.6% of patients within the ODT goal along the study period. With no improvement over time, the proportion of patients within the DIT goal stayed stable and at a low level (range: 5.5-7.0%) for all patients, decreasing from 25.2% to 11.4% for thrombolyzed patients. The proportion of thrombolyzed patients within the DNT goal varied from 15.1% to 30.3% during study period. These results highlight the urgent need for action to improve in-hospital management of stroke patients, focusing on delays between admission and imaging.

[Linking Interventional Cardiology clinical registry data with French hospital administrative data: Development and validation of deterministic record linkage]. / Appariement entre un registre régional de pratiques en cardiologie interventionnelle et la base médico-administrative d'hospitalisation française : développement et validation d'un algorithme d'appariement déterministe.

BACKGROUND: To recreate the in-hospital healthcare pathway for patients treated with coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention, we linked the interventional cardiology registry (ACIRA) and the pseudonymized French hospital medical information system database (PMSI) in the Aquitaine region. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a deterministic merging algorithm between these exhaustive and complementary databases. METHODS: After a pre-treatment phase of the databases to standardize the 11 identified linking variables, a deterministic linking algorithm was developed on ACIRA hospital stays between December 2011 and December 2014 in nine interventional cardiology centers as well as the data from the consolidated PMSI databases of the Aquitaine region from 2011 to 2014. Merging was carried out through 12 successive steps, the first consisting in strict linking of the 11 variables. The performance of the algorithm was analyzed in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Strategies complementary to the initial algorithm (change in the order of variables and base preprocessing) were tested. Comparative analysis of merged/unmerged patients explored potential causes of mismatch. RESULTS: The algorithm found 97.2% of the 31,621 ACIRA stays to have sensitivity of 99.9% (95% CI [99.9; 99.9]), specificity of 97.9% (95% CI [97.7; 98.1]), PPV of 99.9% (95% CI [99.9; 99.9]) and NPV of 96.9% (95% CI [96.7; 97.1]). Complementary strategies did not yield better results. The unmerged patients were older, and hospitalized mostly in 2012 in two interventional cardiology centers. CONCLUSION: This study underscored the feasibility and validity of an indirect deterministic pairing to routinely link a registry of practices using hospital data to pseudonymized medico-administrative databases. This method, which can be extrapolated to other health events leading to hospitalization, renders it possible to effectively reconstruct patients' hospital healthcare pathway.

International variation in managing locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer: prospective benchmark analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tumour extension beyond the mesorectal plane (ymrT4) occurs in 5-10 per cent of patients with rectal cancer and 10 per cent of patients develop locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) after primary surgery. There is global variation in healthcare delivery for these conditions. METHODS: An international benchmark trial of the management of ymrT4 tumours and LRRC was undertaken in France and Australia between 2015 and 2017. Heterogeneity in management and operative decision-making were analysed by comparison of surgical resection rates, blinded intercountry reading of pelvic MRI, quality-of-life assessment and qualitative evaluations. RESULTS: Among 154 patients (97 in France and 57 in Australia), 31·8 per cent had ymrT4 disease and 68·2 per cent LRRC. The surgical resection rates were 88 and 79 per cent in France and Australia respectively (P = 0·112). The concordance in operative planning was low (κ = 0·314); the rate of pelvic exenteration was lower in France than Australia both in clinical practice (36 of 78 versus 34 of 40; P < 0·001) and in theoretical conditions (10 of 25 versus 50 of 57; P = 0·002). The R0 resection rate was lower in France than Australia for LRRC (25 of 49 versus 18 of 21; P = 0·007) but not for ymrT4 tumours (21 of 26 versus 15 of 15; P = 0·139). Morbidity rates were similar. Patients who underwent non-exenterative procedures had higher scores on the mental functioning subscale at 12 months (P = 0·047), and a lower level of distress at 6 months (P = 0·049). Qualitative analysis highlighted five categories of psychosocial factors influencing treatment decisions: patient, strategy, specialist, organization and culture. CONCLUSION: This international benchmark trial has highlighted the differences in worldwide treatment of locally advanced and LRRC. Standardized care should improve outcomes for these patients.

ANTECEDENTES: La extensión del tumor más allá del plano del meso-rrecto (ymrT4) ocurre en el 5-10% de los pacientes con cáncer de recto y el 10% de los pacientes desarrollan recidiva local del cáncer de recto (locally recurrent rectal cáncer, LRRC) después de una cirugía primaria. Existe una variación global en la prestación de la asistencia sanitaria para esta pato-logía. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un ensayo de referencia internacional sobre el manejo de ymrT4 y LRRC en Francia y Australia entre 2015 y 2017. La heterogeneidad en el manejo y la toma de decisiones quirúrgicas se analizaron mediante la comparación de las tasas de resección quirúrgica, la lectura a ciegas de la resonancia magnética (RM) pélvica entre países, la evaluación de la calidad de vida y las evaluaciones cualitativas. RESULTADOS: De 154 pacientes (97 en Francia versus 57 en Australia), el 32% tenía ymrT4 y el 68% tenía cáncer de recto con recidiva local. Las tasas de resección quirúrgica fueron del 87,6% versus 77,8% (P = 0,112). La tasa de concordancia en la decisión quirúrgica fue baja (coeficiente kappa = 0,314) con una tasa más baja de exenteración pélvica en Francia, tanto en la práctica clínica (46% versus 85%; P < 0,0001) como en condiciones teóricas (40% versus 88%; P = 0,002). La tasa de resección R0 fue menor en Francia para la LRRC (51% versus 86%, P = 0,007) pero no para el ymrT4 (81% versus 100%, P = 0,139). Las tasas de morbilidad fueron similares. Los pacientes que se sometieron a procedimientos no exenterativos tuvieron una subescala de funcionamiento mental más alta a los 12 meses (P = 0,04) y un nivel de angustia más bajo a los 6 meses (P = 0,04). El análisis cualitativo destacó 5 categorías de factores psicosociales que afectaron a la decisión del tratamiento: paciente, estrategia, especialista, organización y cultura. CONCLUSIÓN: Este ensayo de referencia internacional destaca las diferencias en el tratamiento mundial del cáncer de recto localmente avanzado y de la LRR. La aten-ción estandarizada debería mejorar los resultados para estos pacientes.

Post-stroke pathway analysis and link with one year sequelae in a French cohort of stroke patients: the PAPASePA protocol study.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a health problem with serious consequences, both in terms of mortality, and after-effects affecting patient quality of life. Stroke requires both urgent and chronic management involving the entire health care system. Although large variability in the management of stroke patients have been noticed, knowledge of the diversity and the scalability of post-stroke pathways, whether it is the care pathway or the life pathway, is currently not sufficient. Moreover the link between post-stroke pathways and patients sequelae have not been yet clearly defined. All this information would be useful to better target the needs to improve stroke patient management. The purposes are to identify the post-stroke life pathways components associated with sequelae (activity limitations - main purpose, cognitive disorders, anxio-depressive disorders, fatigue, participation restrictions) at 3 months and 1 year post-stroke, to define a typology of life pathways of patients during the post-stroke year and to analyze the social and geographical inequalities in the management of stroke. METHODS: Design: a prospective multicenter comparative cohort study with a follow up to 1 year after the acute episode. Participant centers: 13 hospitals in the Aquitaine region (France). STUDY POPULATION: patients diagnosed with a confirmed ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke included in the Aquitaine Observatory of Stroke (ObA2) cohort and voluntary to participate. Data sources are existing databases (ObA2 database and the French National Health Data System - SNDS) to collect information about care pathways, patient characteristics and stroke characteristics and Ad hoc surveys to collect information about life pathways and post-stroke sequelae. The endpoints of the study are post-stroke activity limitations evaluated by the modified Rankin score, other post-stroke sequelae (Cognitive disorders, anxio-depressive disorders, fatigue, restriction of participation) assessed by standardized and validated scales and Clusters of patients responding to pathways with common or similar characteristics.; DISCUSSION: By integrating a longitudinal dimension and relying on a large cohort, the project will make it possible to identify the sources of disturbances and the factors favorable to the outcome of the life pathways, important for the planning of the offer and the management of the public policies concerning stroke pathways. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03865173 , March 6th, 2019.

EPOCK study protocol: a mixed-methods research program evaluating cancer care coordination nursing occupations in France as a complex intervention.

BACKGROUND: Facing the increasing cancer incidence and cancer survivorship, many national strategic cancer plans have identified cancer care coordination as a priority for health service improvement. However, the high variability of practices, the diversity of definitions and underlying concepts increases the existing difficulty to standardise, replicate, transpose and assess care coordination within the French health system context. The EPOCK national study aims at evaluating practices and the working context of hospital-based cancer care coordination nurses, based on a previously designed reference framework for care coordination within the French health system context. METHODS: EPOCK is based on a comprehensive evaluation of nursing professions in cancer care coordination, considered as a complex intervention. Phase 1 (theoretical phase) will define and design a theoretical reference framework for care coordination in France through an international literature review, aiming to identify relevant models and all components of the expected framework and a structured consensus method, the Nominal group technique, aiming to select and prioritise the most relevant components already found in the literature review with regard to the French healthcare system; phase 2 (Operational phase) will consist in an in-depth analysis of practices, contexts, perceptions and attitudes related to care coordination occupations by nurses in oncology and all stakeholders (related professionals, patients and their caregivers) through a multicentric cross-sectional mixed-method evaluative study. The observed practices and contexts will be finally compared with the theoretical reference framework using both inductive and deductive approaches. DISCUSSION: This study will result in an evaluation framework identifying key models and key elements relative to cancer care coordination interventions that can be used to guide management of cancer care coordination nursing occupations within the French healthcare system. EPOCK would also assist in public decision-making to identify optimal targets, skills profiles and scope of actions for cancer coordination professions. Finally, EPOCK will describe typology of nurse practices in cancer care coordination and thus obtain precise preliminary information essential for drafting a medico-economic evaluation study of these new nursing professions' impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrial.gov registration: NCT03350776 , 11/22/2017.

Design and validation of a questionnaire to assess organizational culture in French hospital wards.

BACKGROUND: Although many organizational culture questionnaires have been developed, there is a lack of any validated multidimensional questionnaire assessing organizational culture at hospital ward level and adapted to health care context. Facing the lack of an appropriate tool, a multidisciplinary team designed and validated a dimensional organizational culture questionnaire for healthcare settings to be administered at ward level. METHODS: A database of organizational culture items and themes was created after extensive literature review. Items were regrouped into dimensions and subdimensions (classification validated by experts). Pre-test and face validation was conducted with 15 health care professionals. In a stratified cluster random sample of hospitals, the psychometric validation was conducted in three phases on a sample of 859 healthcare professionals from 36 multidisciplinary medicine services: 1) the exploratory phase included a description of responses' saturation levels, factor and correlations analyses and an internal consistency analysis (Cronbach's alpha coefficient); 2) confirmatory phase used the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM); 3) reproducibility was studied by a test-retest. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 80 %; the completion average was 97 %. The metrological results were: a global Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.93, higher than 0.70 for 12 sub-dimensions; all Dillon-Goldstein's rho coefficients higher than 0.70; an excellent quality of external model with a Goodness of Fitness (GoF) criterion of 0.99. Seventy percent of the items had a reproducibility ranging from moderate (Intra-Class Coefficient between 50 and 70 % for 25 items) to good (ICC higher than 70 % for 33 items). CONCLUSIONS: COMEt (Contexte Organisationnel et Managérial en Etablissement de Santé) questionnaire is a validated multidimensional organizational culture questionnaire made of 6 dimensions, 21 sub-dimensions and 83 items. It is the first dimensional organizational culture questionnaire, specific to healthcare context, for a unit level assessment showing robust psychometric properties (validity and reliability). This tool is suited for research purposes, especially for assessing organizational context in research analysing the effectiveness of hospital quality improvement strategies. Our tool is also suited for an overall assessment of ward culture and could be a powerful trigger to improve management and clinical performance. Its psychometric properties in other health systems need to be tested.

[Combined quantitative and qualitative methods to identify local facilitators of and barriers to physician's adherence to clinical practice guidelines]. / Analyse qualitative et quantitative des déterminants à l'application de recommandations professionnelles (RP) par les médecins.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) implementation interventions could be improved by their adaptation to facilitators of and barriers to practice change in each setting. Very few is known about these local factors in French hospitals. Our objectives were to identify the facilitator factors of and barriers to physician's adherence to CPG in internal medicine wards in France and to determine the factors most strongly statistically associated to CPG adherence. METHODS: Combined qualitative and quantitative methods. Two CPGs were chosen as examples. The settings were internal medicine wards of hospitals of the Aquitaine region voluntary to participate. Qualitative analyses were conducted in the internal medicine wards of 5 hospitals in the Aquitaine region selected among the 12 voluntary hospitals to represent the variability of situations. QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS: A questionnaire was constituted by the factors retrieved through the qualitative analyses and a previous literature review as barriers or facilitator factors to physician's adherence to CPG and asked the physicians on the degree of CPG adherence. It was sent to each physician of the internal medicine wards of the 12 voluntary hospitals. The responses to the questionnaire allowed the analysis of the frequency of each factor and the strength of the statistical association between these factors and CPG adherence. RESULTS: These analyses focused on the importance of the management, particularly the role of ward head and of the exchange between physicians. The attitude to CPGs varied according to the individual positionnement on the professional hierarchy, function of the quantity of research activities and of the local, regional and national radiance of the ward. Organisational difficulties as professionals and patients turn over, work overload, lack of coordination between wards were organisational barriers to CPG adherence. The quantitative analysis confirmed the role of managerial and organisational factors in the CPG adherence. CONCLUSION: Following step was to validate a tool of barriers to CPG adherence identification and to study the effectiveness of this a priori identification in improving CPG adherence.

Lack of validity of a French adaptation of a scale measuring attitudes towards clinical practice guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Valid instruments to measure practitioners' attitudes towards clinical practice guidelines need to be developed. However, few of the available instruments have been thoroughly validated. OBJECTIVE: To adapt into French and to test the reliability and validity of a scale for measurement of attitudes towards guidelines developed by Elovainio et al. METHODS: A 27-item scale (divided into six dimensions) measuring attitudes towards guidelines was translated into French by two English native translators, reviewed and finalized by expert committee and administered to 314 practitioners who agreed to participate. Main practitioners' characteristics were collected. Item and dimension reproducibility were assessed for 62 practitioners by calculation of intraclass correlation coefficients. Internal construct validity was assessed by principal components analyses. Convergent and discriminant validity were analysed. RESULTS: Item response rates ranged from 82 to 100%. In the test-retest procedure, intraclass correlation coefficients for separate items ranged from 0.1 to 0.7 and those for dimensions were 0.7 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.5-0.8] for usefulness, 0.5 (0.3-0.6) for reliability, 0.4 (0.2-0.5) for individual competence, 0.5 (0.3-0.6) for organizational competence, 0.7 (0.5-0.8) for impracticality and 0.4 (0.3-0.6) for availability. The factorial structure after Varimax rotation showed that none of the different solutions obtained had a strictly comparable structure to that of the original scale. External construct validity was satisfactory. CONCLUSION: This scale does not have satisfactory psychometric properties and therefore cannot confidently be used in future research assessing whether attitudes towards guidelines are a determining factor in physicians' compliance with guidelines. More research is needed to develop valid scales in a more rigorous procedure, involving qualitative and quantitative steps.

[Medico-economic assessment of two methods for implementing thyroid testing guidelines]. / Evaluation médico-économique de la mise en oeuvre de recommandations de prescription des examens biologiques explorant la fonction thyroïdienne.

BACKGROUND: To compare independent and combined effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two implementation interventions of guidelines for ordering thyroid function tests. The two implementation interventions were a Memorandum Pocket Card (MPC) and a Test Request Form (TRF). Intervention groups were wards. METHODS: The study used an experimental 2*2 factorial design with matching hospitals according to size and activity and wards according to pre-intervention appropriateness for test ordering. Four ward groups were established: the dual intervention group, the order form group, the pocket card group and the control group. Physicians in all groups received guidelines and were invited to a local information meeting. The main outcome measure of effectiveness was the Guideline Conformity Rate (GCR). The cost-effectiveness ratio was the cost difference between the tested intervention and the control intervention upon effectiveness difference between the tested intervention and the control intervention. RESULTS: Six hospitals participated in the study (two middle-sized hospitals, two small-sized hospitals and two psychiatric hospitals). A total of 1412 orders for thyroid function tests were collected. GCR was 78% in the dual intervention group, 83% in the order form group, 73% in the pocket card group and 62% in the control group. The interaction between TRF and MPC was not significant (B=-0.70, p=0.21). Compared to simple information, TRF was effective in increasing GCR (OR=2.65, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.52-4.62), unlike MPC (OR=1.28, CI: 0.75-2.19). TRF was the less expensive and the most effective intervention. CONCLUSION: Using a robust design, our study shows a greater effectiveness of TRF than MPC and their association in implementing thyroid function test guidelines. The development of clinical practice improvement projects through the second procedure of accreditation in France is a good opportunity to develop a guidelines implementation research project.

[Individual and collective facilitators of and barriers to the use of clinical practice guidelines by physicians: a literature review]. / Facteurs individuels et collectifs associés à l'application des recommandations de pratique clinique par le corps médical. Revue de la littérature.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) diffusion to physicians depends on local barriers or facilitators related to the CPG, to the individual clinician and the professional context. Our project aimed to retrieve, by a literature review, all the facilitators of and barriers to physician's adherence to CPG and propose a classification of these barriers and facilitators. METHOD: A comprehensive review of the literature. We searched in Medline, Healthstar, Current contents, Cochrane library databases, consulted experts in the domain of CPG implementation and reviewed study bibliography to retrieve all original reports studying facilitators of and barriers to physician's adherence to CPG (inclusion criteria). The article selection followed a two stepped procedure: first, quick reading of the retrieved articles, then reading in depth of the potentially appropriate articles. RESULTS: Fifty nine studies published between 1986 and 2001 were eligible. The majority (29 studies) used a quantitative design, having studied the statistical association between some a priori defined barriers or facilitators (collected by questionnaires or by record audits) and CPG use. The others have used a qualitative design (barriers and facilitators collected through qualitative methods or open-ended questions in questionnaires) (21 studies) or a mixed design (qualitative and quantitative) (8 studies). Study samples sizes ranked between 10 and 1878 physicians. The CPG were mostly about prevention or curative care. The retrieved barriers or facilitators were classified into three categories: 1) the CPG characteristics (form, compatibility, trialability, scientific basis, observability, adaptability, legal implications) (27 articles), 2) the physician characteristics (knowledge about CPG, attitude and agreement to CPG, psychological and socio-demographic and economic characteristics, job satisfaction, training) (38 articles), 3) the physician environment (divided into 3a the physician human environment--the patient influence and the pairs influence (16 articles)--and 3b the physician organizational environment--the internal environment and the external environment (33 articles). CONCLUSION: The interpretation of the results is hampered by the absence of previous conceptual framework of the barriers or facilitators and by the absence of multifactorial analysis.

Factors associated with nurses' poor knowledge and practice of transfusion safety procedures in Aquitaine, France.

OBJECTIVES: To (1) describe knowledge, attitudes, and reported practice of blood transfusion of nurses in Aquitaine's hospitals; (2) measure the potential threat for patient safety of poor transfusion-related knowledge and practice; and (3) identify factors associated with poor knowledge and practice. DESIGN: Survey conducted in 14 hospitals in Aquitaine (one university and 13 general hospitals). SETTING: Hospitalized care. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of nurses. MATERIALS: Data were collected anonymously by investigators through structured individual interviews. The questionnaire contained mainly knowledge and practice questions about blood transfusion regulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hazardous knowledge and practice scores have been constructed, reflecting the levels of potential danger in the answers to the questionnaire. Factors associated with these scores have been studied using a random-effect linear regression. RESULTS: In our sample of 1090 nurses, poor knowledge and practice concerned mainly (1) the bedside blood compatibility test [proportion of responses (PR) with potential life threat between 12.7 and 35.5%]; (2) pre-transfusion compatibility check when receiving blood units (PR = 34.5%); (3) delay between screening of red cell antibodies and transfusion (PR = 20.5%); (4) delay in preservation of blood unit in the ward (PR = 33.4%); and (5) recognition of abnormal reactions after transfusion (PR = 47.1%). Frequency of transfusion and training were the factors most strongly associated with hazardous knowledge and practice scores. CONCLUSION: Low training and transfusion activity were key determinants of poor transfusion-related knowledge and practice.

[Prescription of thyroid function tests in adults as a function of clinical circumstances and of patient management]. / Prescription des examens biologiques explorant la fonction thyroïdienne chez l'adulte en fonction des circonstances cliniques et de prise en charge du patient.

A group of experts composed of clinicians and biologists in 7 University Hospitals in the Aquitaine and Paris regions working within the framework of the Coordination Committee for Clinical Evaluation and Quality in Aquitaine (CCECQA) have developed prescription guidelines for thyroid function tests to be performed in adults. The goal was to determine strategies for prescribing thyroid hormones (T3 and T4) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) to screen for thyroid function disorders and follow thyroid function. The resulting recommendations were based on a review of the literature and a consensus among the experts. The first part of the guidelines concern recommended prescriptions in different clinical situations (early diagnosis of hypothyroidism, early diagnosis of hyperthyroidism, follow-up of anti-thyroid drug treatments, follow-up of levothyroxin replacement therapy, institution and follow-up of treatments susceptible of inducing dysthyroidism, pregnancy and post-partum dysthyroidism, palpation of a thyroid nodule). The second part of the guidelines are devoted to prescriptions according to the therapeutic setting (emergency care, psychiatric care, geriatric care).