A primitive T cell-independent mechanism of intestinal mucosal IgA responses to commensal bacteria.

The immunoglobulin A (IgA) is produced to defend mucosal surfaces from environmental organisms, but host defenses against the very heavy load of intestinal commensal microorganisms are poorly understood. The IgA against intestinal commensal bacterial antigens was analyzed; it was not simply "natural antibody" but was specifically induced and responded to antigenic changes within an established gut flora. In contrast to IgA responses against exotoxins, a significant proportion of this specific anti-commensal IgA induction was through a pathway that was independent of T cell help and of follicular lymphoid tissue organization, which may reflect an evolutionarily primitive form of specific immune defense.

Curve-fitting in pharmacokinetics--a comparison between gamma- and biexponential fits.

Seven sets of plasma concentration-time data were fitted to both a conventional biexponential equation and a gamma equation. The values of clearance (CL) and mean residence time (MRT) were calculated from the fitted parameters and compared with the values calculated by the trapezoid rule. Both the biexponential and gamma equations provided adequate fits to the data. The values of CL and MRT calculated from the biexponential fits correlated very closely with the values calculated by the trapezoid rule, but there were large discrepancies between the values calculated from the gamma fits and the trapezoid rule. The biexponential model appears to be less sensitive to scatter in the data.

Pharmacokinetics and plasma-concentration-effect relationships of prenalterol in cardiac failure.

Prenalterol was administered as an intravenous infusion at three incremental rates (60, 120 and 240 nmol/min) to five patients with severe cardiac failure. Haemodynamic, hormonal and metabolic variables were measured at the same time as plasma prenalterol concentrations, and the pharmacokinetics of the drug were studied by following plasma concentrations and urinary excretion during and after the infusion. Concentration-dependent increases in cardiac index, stroke index and stroke work index were observed without increases in arterial pressure, heart rate or myocardial oxygen demand. The reninangiotensin-aldosterone system was stimulated, although the extent of stimulation varied among patients. No strong correlations were found between the logarithm of the plasma prenalterol concentration and effect. Plasma clearance of the drug was lower in cardiac patients than in normal volunteers, but a large decrease in renal clearance was partially balanced by an increase in nonrenal clearance. Over the observed range of concentrations, no deviation from linearity was evident, and plasma concentrations of about 150 nmol/l were effective in improving cardiac function without significant side-effects.

Acute intravenous and sustained oral treatment with the beta1 agonist prenalterol in patients with chronic severe cardiac failure.

Prenalterol, a beta1 agonist, was given in a single blind acute intravenous study to seven patients with cardiac failure (New York Heart Association class II and III). It was then given in a double blind crossover study of sustained oral prenalterol to six of them. As a result of dose titration studies the oral dose of prenalterol given was 100 mg twice a day in all patients. Erect bicycle sprint tests were performed to exercise tolerance before and after treatment had been started. Cardiac function was assessed at rest and during graded supine bicycle exercise by determining haemodynamic indices using a Swan-Ganz catheter and radionuclide left ventricular ejection fractions. In the intravenous study cardiac function was assessed at rest and during exercise after a control infusion of dextrose and after an infusion of 5 mg prenalterol. In the oral crossover study a placebo or prenalterol were given for two periods of two weeks; at the end of each period exercise tolerance was measured and cardiac function assessed at rest and during exercise. Throughout the study period there was no change in symptoms, medication, or exercise tolerance. Intravenous prenalterol significantly improved cardiac function; left ventricular ejection fraction and cardiac index increased and left ventricular filling pressure fell both at rest and during exercise. Sustained oral treatment with prenalterol, however, did not improve resting left ventricular filling pressure or left ventricular ejection fraction at rest or during exercise but did increase heart rate at rest, and mean blood pressure and peripheral vascular resistance at rest and during exercise; in fact, during exercise left ventricular filling pressure was significantly increased while cardiac index and stroke volume index were decreased by prenalterol. Sustained oral treatment with prenalterol did not have the beneficial effects on cardiac function produced by intravenous treatment and in fact had deleterious effect on the measured indices of cardiac function during exercise.