Gait velocity control using projection mapping for children with spastic diplegia cerebral palsy.

BACKGROUND: Gait characteristics in children with cerebral palsy vary according to their individual walking speed. As such, establishing methods to maintain a consistent gait velocity are necessary to evaluate specific intervention effects in this clinical population. Our study aim was to validate the accuracy of projection mapping for guiding gait velocity to a control gait velocity. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 13 children with cerebral palsy (mean age [standard deviation] of 12.42 [2.31] years). The target velocity was calculated from the average speed obtained across three trials of self-selected walking speed. A virtual reality system with four projectors was used to project an image onto the floor to guide children to match two gait conditions: 100% and 125% velocity of the average speed. Participants completed three gait trials at each velocity under image guidance. Gait velocity was quantified using a 3-dimensional motion capture system. Bland-Altman plots were used to analyze systematic errors and the limits of agreement calculated. FINDINGS: The results indicated the limits of agreement were acceptable for 0.10 m/s for 100% velocity and 0.12 m/s for 125% velocity. Therefore, projection mapping was effective in guiding children to adjust their gait to the intended velocity. INTERPRETATION: Projection mapping is a novel method for guiding children with cerebral palsy to walk at a controlled target velocity that may improve the reliability of gait analysis.

Analysis of center of mass and center of pressure displacement in the transverse plane during gait termination in children with cerebral palsy.

BACKGROUND: While gait termination is challenging for children with spastic cerebral palsy (CCP), few studies have quantitatively assessed this issue. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the characteristics of center of mass (COM) and center of pressure (COP) displacement during gait termination in CCP, and how do they compare with those in children with typical development (CTD)? METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 13 adults with typical development (19.85 ± 0.52 years), 12 CTD (10.41 ± 2.98 years), and 16 CCP (11.15 ± 2.71 years). Participants were instructed to immediately stop walking when a stop sign appeared on a screen, which was placed at the end of an 8-m walkway. COM and COP were determined via 3-dimensional motion analysis and force plate data. Differences between the groups were assessed using the two sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The normalized time for stopping in CCP (4.556 ± 0.602) was higher than that in CTD (3.617 ± 0.545, P < 0.001). The normalized COP displacement (P < 0.001) and divergence between COM and COP (P < 0.001) in the mediolateral (ML) direction were significantly higher in CCP than CTD. However, the normalized divergence between COM and COP in the anteroposterior (AP) direction in CCP was lower than that in CTD (P = 0.034). SIGNIFICANCE: The more minor divergence between COM and COP in the AP direction and the more significant COP displacement in the ML direction cause difficulty to exert braking force during gait termination. Thus, CCP require a longer time for gait termination. This finding may facilitate the development of interventions for improving gait in CCP.