Comparative effects of fixed-dose mitiglinide/voglibose combination and glimepiride on vascular endothelial function and glycemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of mitiglinide/voglibose with those of glimepiride on glycemic variability and vascular endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a multicenter, open-label, randomized, crossover study. Hospitalized patients received either mitiglinide/voglibose (three times daily administration of 10 mg mitiglinide and 0.2 mg voglibose) or glimepiride (once-daily 2 mg) in random order, each for 5 days. The reactive hyperemia index (RHI) and the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) were measured as co-primary endpoints using reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry and continuous glucose monitoring. RESULTS: The analysis included 30 patients (15 in each group). The RHI was 1.670 ± 0.369 during treatment with mitiglinide/voglibose and 1.716 ± 0.492 during treatment with glimepiride, with no significant difference between the two. MAGE was significantly lower in the mitiglinide/voglibose group (47.6 ± 18.5 mg/dL) than in the glimepiride group (100.6 ± 32.2 mg/dL). Although the mean blood glucose levels over the entire 24 h period were comparable between the two groups, the use of mitiglinide/voglibose was associated with a lower standard deviation of mean glucose, coefficient of variation, and mean postprandial glucose excursion compared with glimepiride. The time below range (<70 mg/dL) and the time above range (>180, >200, and 250 mg/dL) were lower in the mitiglinide/voglibose group, while the time in range (70-180 mg/dL) was higher. CONCLUSIONS: In our short-duration randomized crossover study, although not impacting vascular endothelial function, mitiglinide/voglibose demonstrated potential benefits in reducing glycemic variability, postprandial hyperglycemia, and hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.

[A Case of Reactive Hypoglycemia Exacerbated Before Menstruation Improved by the Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring].

A 40-year-old female patient was referred to our department with a complaint of postprandial hypoglycemia. We performed a 75g oral glucose tolerance test, and the patient was diagnosed as having impaired glucose tolerance with a 1-hour blood glucose of 245 mg/dl and a 2-hour blood glucose of 196 mg/dl. The patient also showed hypoglycemia with a 6-hour blood glucose of 46 mg/dl, and delayed hypersecretion of insulin, which was diagnosed as reactive hypoglycemia. The patient was diagnosed as having reactive hypoglycemia with delayed hypersecretion of insulin. She was given dietary guidance to avoid simple carbohydrates, and voglibose 0.6 mg was started for glucose intolerance and reactive hypoglycemia. The frequency of hypoglycemic symptoms decreased for a while, but gradually increased again. An interview revealed that the frequency of hypoglycemia was high at 2-3 days before menstruation, and Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM) was applied to check the blood glucose fluctuation before and after menstruation. Her postprandial hyperglycemia worsened with FGM, and reactive hypoglycemia appeared 3 days before menstruation, while postprandial hyperglycemia improved and reactive hypoglycemia disappeared 4 days after menstruation. The frequency of hypoglycemia was reduced by instructing the patient to take voglibose before menses and to eat a supplementary meal after lunch a few days before menses. There have been no reports on the evaluation of reactive hypoglycemia exacerbated before menstruation by FGM. The menstrual cycle should be considered in the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of reactive hypoglycemia.