Efficacy of indocyanine green fluoroscopy for sentinel node biopsy in head and neck melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The objective of this review was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of ICG (indocyanine green) for sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in head and neck melanoma. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses statement standards (PRISMA) were followed when conducting this review with a comprehensive search of the following online databases; Google Scholar, PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry (http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/), ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinical-trials.gov/), and the ISRCTN registry (http://www.isrctn.com/). Nine studies met the inclusion criteria and results were reported with forest plots at 95% confidence intervals. Primary outcomes of interest included the localisation rate for sentinel node biopsies in head and neck melanoma using ICG and its compared with other adjunct modalities. Secondary outcome measures included false negative rates as well as sensitivity rates for nodal detection with radiocolloid as well as blue dye. ICG reported an overall sensitivity rate of 95% with an untransformed proportion metric analysis (0.950, 0.922, 0.978 (95% CI)). It demonstrated a superior detection rate to blue dye (Odds ratio 15.417, 95% CI, 4.652 to 51.091, p < 0.001) and a comparable localisation efficacy to radiocolloid (Odds ratio 1.425, 95% CI, 0.535 to 3.794, p = 0.478). The sensitivity rate for radiocolloid utilisation in isolation was 90.6% (untransformed proportion metric, 0.906, 0.855, 0.957) and blue dye was 48.7% (untransformed proportion metric, 0.487, 0.364, 0.610). This is the first meta-analysis on the efficacy of ICG for sentinel node detection in head and neck melanoma. The authors advocate for a dual modality approach with ICG and radiocolloid to mitigate the inherent limitations of both methods when conducting sentinel node retrieval for head and neck melanoma. Further high-quality randomised trials are needed to improve the current evidence base.

Ewing's sarcoma of the duodenum: a rare clinical condition managed with surgical resection.

A man in his 40s with no medical history presented with right-sided abdominal and chest pain. A CT scan of the abdomen demonstrated a 7.7 cm heterogeneous mass arising from the second part of the duodenum. Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy confirmed a malignant-appearing duodenal lesion, with biopsy showing features consistent with small cell carcinoma. The patient underwent three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by elective Kausch-Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy. A combination of immunohistochemistry and molecular studies confirmed the diagnosis of a rare Ewing's sarcoma tumour originating from the duodenum with invasion into the duodenal lumen. The patient recovered well from surgery and remains disease-free 18 months following resection.

The First Modified Delphi Consensus-Building Exercise on Surgical Ward Rounds in the United Kingdom National Health Service.

BACKGROUND: The ward round is an integral part of everyday surgical practice. It is a complex clinical activity that requires both sound clinical management and communication skills. This study reports the results of a consensus-building exercise on the common aspects of the general surgical ward rounds. METHODS: The consensus-building committee involving a range of stakeholders from 16 United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service trusts took part in this consensus exercise. The members discussed and suggested a series of statements concerning surgical ward round. An agreement of ≥ 70% among members was regarded as a consensus. RESULTS: Thirty-two members voted on 60 statements. There was a consensus on fifty-nine statements after the first round of voting, and one statement was modified before it reached consensus in the second round. The statements covered nine sections: a preparation phase, team allocation, multidisciplinary approach to the ward round, structure of the round, teaching considerations, confidentiality and privacy, documentation, post-round arrangements, and weekend round. There was a consensus on spending time to prepare for the round, a consultant-led round, involvement of the nursing staff, an MDT round at the beginning and end of the week, a minimum of 5 min allocated to each patient, utilisation of a round checklist, afternoon virtual round, and a clear handover and plan for the weekend. CONCLUSION: The consensus committee achieved agreement on several aspects concerning the surgical ward rounds in the UK NHS. This should help improve the care of surgical patients in the UK.