ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The occurrence of pneumomediastinum (PM) and/or pneumothorax (PTX) in patients with severe pneumonia due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was evaluated. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted in patients admitted to the intermediate respiratory care unit (IRCU) of a COVID-19 monographic hospital in Madrid (Spain) between December 14, 2020 and September 28, 2021. All patients had a diagnosis of severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and required noninvasive respiratory support (NIRS): high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP). The incidences of PM and/or PTX, overall and by NIRS, and their impact on the probabilities of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and death were studied. RESULTS: A total of 1306 patients were included. 4.3% (56/1306) developed PM/PTX, 3.8% (50/1306) PM, 1.6% (21/1306) PTX, and 1.1% (15/1306) PM + PTX. 16.1% (9/56) of patients with PM/PTX had HFNC alone, while 83.9% (47/56) had HFNC + CPAP/BiPAP. In comparison, 41.7% (521/1250) of patients without PM and PTX had HFNC alone (odds ratio [OR] 0.27; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.13-0.55; p < .001), while 58.3% (729/1250) had HFNC + CPAP/BiPAP (OR 3.73; 95% CI 1.81-7.68; p < .001). The probability of needing IMV among patients with PM/PTX was 67.9% (36/53) (OR 7.46; 95% CI 4.12-13.50; p < .001), while it was 22.1% (262/1185) among patients without PM and PTX. Mortality among patients with PM/PTX was 33.9% (19/56) (OR 4.39; 95% CI 2.45-7.85; p < .001), while it was 10.5% (131/1250) among patients without PM and PTX. CONCLUSIONS: In patients admitted to the IRCU for severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia requiring NIRS, incidences of PM/PTX, PM, PTX, and PM + PTX were observed to be 4.3%, 3.8%, 1.6%, and 1.1%, respectively. Most patients with PM/PTX had HFNC + CPAP/BiPAP as the NIRS device, much more frequently than patients without PM and PTX. The probabilities of IMV and death among patients with PM/PTX were 64.3% and 33.9%, respectively, higher than those observed in patients without PM and PTX, which were 21.0% and 10.5%, respectively.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Noninvasive Ventilation , Pneumonia , Pneumothorax , Respiratory Insufficiency , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/therapy , Respiratory Care Units , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/therapy , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Pneumothorax/etiology , Pneumothorax/therapy , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Many patients with COVID-19 require respiratory support and close monitoring. Intermediate respiratory care units (IRCU) may be valuable to optimally and adequately implement noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) to decrease clinical failure. We aimed at describing intubation and mortality in a novel facility entirely dedicated to COVID-19 and to establish their outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study performed at one hospital in Spain. We included consecutive subjects age > 18 y, admitted to IRCU with COVID-19 pneumonia, and requiring NRS between December 2020-September 2021. Data collected included mode and usage of NRS, laboratory findings, endotracheal intubation, and mortality at day 30. A multivariable Cox model was used to assess risk factors associated with clinical failure and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1,306 subjects were included; 64.6% were male with mean age of 54.7 y. During the IRCU stay, 345 subjects clinically failed NRS (85.5% intubated; 14.5% died). Cox model showed a higher clinical failure in IRCU upon onset of symptoms and hospitalization was < 10 d (hazard ratio [HR] 1.59 [95% CI 1.24-2.03], P < .001) and PaO2 /FIO2 < 100 mm Hg (HR 1.59 [95% CI 1.27-1.98], P < .001). These variables were not associated with increased 30-d mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The IRCU was a valuable option to manage subjects with COVID-19 requiring NRS, thus reducing ICU overload. Male sex, gas exchange, and blood chemistry at admission were associated with worse prognosis, whereas older age, gas exchange, and blood chemistry were associated with 30-d mortality. These findings may provide a basis for better understanding outcomes and to improve management of noninvasively ventilated patients with COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Insufficiency , Humans , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Female , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/complications , Respiratory Care Units , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitalization , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Intensive Care UnitsABSTRACT
Antecedentes y objetivo: La utilidad de la ecografía como herramienta pronóstica en pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca aguda es conocida, pero la mayoría de estudios han sido realizados en grupos mixtos de pacientes con fracción de eyección preservada y reducida. Si bien algunos análisis de subgrupos sugieren ausencia de diferencias en función de la fracción de eyección, no existen estudios específicos que lo confirmen. Nuestro objetivo es determinar la utilidad pronóstica de la ecografía a pie de cama en pacientes ingresados por insuficiencia cardíaca y fracción de eyección preservada.Material y métodoEstudio de cohortes prospectivo con seguimiento a 3meses tras realización de ecografía pulmonar previa al alta en pacientes ingresados por insuficiencia cardíaca aguda y fracción de eyección preservada. Se determinan las líneasB presentes al alta. Se constituyen dos grupos: con menos de 15líneasB (no expuestos) y con 15 o más (expuestos). Se comparan en términos de reingreso y muerte debidos a insuficiencia cardíaca.ResultadosEl grupo expuesto tiene mayor riesgo de reingreso (HR: 2,39; IC95%: 1,12-5,12; p=0,024), incluso tras ajuste multivariable (HR: 2,46; IC95%: 1,11-5,46; p=0,03). No se ha encontrado asociación con mortalidad por insuficiencia cardíaca (HR: 1,28; IC95%: 0,23-6,98).ConclusiónLa congestión subclínica evaluada con ecografía pulmonar al alta se asocia con peor pronóstico en pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca aguda y fracción de eyección preservada. Los pacientes con 15 o más líneasB tienen un riesgo 2,5 mayor de reingreso que los pacientes menos congestivos. (AU)
Background and objective: The utility of lung ultrasound as a prognostic tool for patients with acute heart failure is well known, but most studies have been conducted in mixed groups of patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction. While some subgroup analysis suggests that lung ultrasound is useful regardless of ejection fraction, no specific studies have addressed this question. Our objective is to determine the utility of bedside lung ultrasound as a prognostic tool for patients with preserved ejection fraction, acute heart failure.Material and methodsProspective cohort study with 3-month follow-up after bedside lung ultrasound before discharge in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. The number of Blines was determined. Two groups were formed: less than 15Blines (unexposed) and 15Blines or more (exposed). They were compared in terms of readmission and death attributable to worsening heart failure.ResultsThe exposed group was at higher risk of readmission (HR: 2.39; 95%CI: 1.12-5.12; P=.024), even after multivariable adjustment (HR: 2.46; 95%CI: 1.11-5.46, P=.03). Differences between groups in terms of mortality were not statistically significant (HR: 1.28; 95%CI: .23-6.98).ConclusionSubclinical congestion evaluated with lung ultrasound before discharge is associated with worse prognosis in patients with acute heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Patients with 15Blines are 2.5times more likely to be readmitted for acute heart failure than less congestive patients. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Heart Failure/diagnostic imaging , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Patient Discharge , Patients , Stroke Volume , Prognosis , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The utility of lung ultrasound as a prognostic tool for patients with acute heart failure is well known, but most studies have been conducted in mixed groups of patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction. While some subgroup analysis suggests that lung ultrasound is useful regardless of ejection fraction, no specific studies have addressed this question. Our objective is to determine the utility of bedside lung ultrasound as a prognostic tool for patients with preserved ejection fraction, acute heart failure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective cohort study with 3-month follow-up after bedside lung ultrasound before discharge in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. The number of Blines was determined. Two groups were formed: less than 15Blines (unexposed) and 15Blines or more (exposed). They were compared in terms of readmission and death attributable to worsening heart failure. RESULTS: The exposed group was at higher risk of readmission (HR: 2.39; 95%CI: 1.12-5.12; P=.024), even after multivariable adjustment (HR: 2.46; 95%CI: 1.11-5.46, P=.03). Differences between groups in terms of mortality were not statistically significant (HR: 1.28; 95%CI: .23-6.98). CONCLUSION: Subclinical congestion evaluated with lung ultrasound before discharge is associated with worse prognosis in patients with acute heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Patients with 15Blines are 2.5times more likely to be readmitted for acute heart failure than less congestive patients.
