Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Magn Reson Med ; 57(6): 1159-67, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17534915

ABSTRACT

The accuracy and precision of an automated graph-cuts (GC) segmentation technique for dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) 3D MR renography (MRR) was analyzed using 18 simulated and 22 clinical datasets. For clinical data, the error was 7.2 +/- 6.1 cm(3) for the cortex and 6.5 +/- 4.6 cm(3) for the medulla. The precision of segmentation was 7.1 +/- 4.2 cm(3) for the cortex and 7.2 +/- 2.4 cm(3) for the medulla. Compartmental modeling of kidney function in 22 kidneys yielded a renal plasma flow (RPF) error of 7.5% +/- 4.5% and single-kidney GFR error of 13.5% +/- 8.8%. The precision was 9.7% +/- 6.4% for RPF and 14.8% +/- 11.9% for GFR. It took 21 min to segment one kidney using GC, compared to 2.5 hr for manual segmentation. The accuracy and precision in RPF and GFR appear acceptable for clinical use. With expedited image processing, DCE 3D MRR has the potential to expand our knowledge of renal function in individual kidneys and to help diagnose renal insufficiency in a safe and noninvasive manner.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Kidney Diseases/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Adult , Aged , Computer Simulation , Contrast Media , Female , Gadolinium DTPA , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Renal Circulation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...