ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a hands-on seminar using a Web conferencing system, based on the post-event questionnaires of the face-to-face and online seminars of the hands-on seminar. For participants to feel realistic training in the online seminars, four educational videos explaining the procedure of the practical skill were created. We compared results of questionnaires acquired from participants after the face-to-face and online seminars. The questions about expectation, comprehension, satisfaction level, and lecture time for the seminars were graded on a 5-point scale. The higher the scores, the higher the rating, except for lecture time. A score of 3 was appropriate for the lecture time, with a higher score indicating that the seminar felt longer and a lower score indicating that the seminar felt shorter. In the evaluation of classroom lectures, such as expectation, comprehension, and satisfaction level for the seminars, there were no significant differences between the face-to-face and online seminars, and both achieved high scores of 4 or more. There was a significant difference in the evaluation of lecture time for classroom lectures, with participants feeling that it was too short in the face-to-face but just right in the online. In all evaluations for hands-on training and discussion, there were no significant differences between the face-to-face and online seminars, and both achieved high scores of 4 or more and time was short. It was concluded that our proposed online seminar approach could achieve a high level of evaluation as face-to-face seminars.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper was to determine the optimal imaging conditions for four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (4D-CBCT) using an X-ray tube and a flat-panel detector mounted on a radiotherapy device. METHODS: The optimal imaging conditions were examined by changing the gantry speed (GS) parameter that affected the exposure time. Exposed dose during imaging and image quality of moving phantom were compared between examined conditions. RESULTS: The weighted computed tomography dose index (CTDIW) decreased linearly with increasing GS. However, when GS was 180°/min or faster, the image quality degraded, and errors of 1 mm or more were observed regarding the size of mock tumor in the moving phantom. The accuracy of automatic image matching was within 0.1 mm when GS of 120°/min or slower was chosen. CONCLUSION: From the results of this study, we concluded that GS of 120°/min is the optimum imaging condition. Under this imaging condition, the exposure time and CTDIW can be reduced by about 50% without compromising the accuracy of image registration, compared to the conventional GS of 70°/min. In addition, it has been clarified that there is an event that image reconstruction is not performed correctly due to the influence of phantom artifacts without depending on GS.
