ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) tears can cause shoulder pain, disability, instability, and humeral head translation. YouTube has become an increasingly popular source of medical information, but little is currently known in terms of quality control of the uploaded content. The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of YouTube videos related to the diagnosis and treatment of Superior Labrum Anterior Posterior (SLAP) tears. METHODS: YouTube was queried in August 2021 using the two predetermined keywords: 'SLAP tear' and 'superior labral tear.' The first 50 videos were analyzed by two independent reviewers and scored using 3 scoring systems: Global Quality Scale (GQS), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), and the Shoulder-Specific Score (SSS) to determine video accuracy and reliability. Title, number of views, video duration, video source, content type, views/day, number of likes, number of dislikes, days since upload, like ratio (Like × 100/ [Like + Dislike]) and Video Power Index (VPI) (Like ratio × View ratio/100) were all recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The scores of most videos were low, with a mean JAMA score of 2.5 (1-4, SD 0.73), a mean GQS of 2.66 (0.5-4.5, SD 0.99) and a mean SSS of 7.13 (0-18, SD 4.39). There were significantly higher mean scores for JAMA, GQS, and SSS in the academic and independent physician categories, with a mean JAMA score of 3.11, GQS score of 3.39, and SSS score of 11 for academic sources and a mean JAMA score of 2.83, GQS score of 3.23, and SSS score of 9.23 for independent physician sources. JAMA score was significantly and positively correlated with video duration (r = 0.405, p = 0.006). Views, likes, dislikes, publication dates, and VPI were not significantly correlated with any scoring scale. CONCLUSION: YouTube videos on the diagnosis and management of SLAP tears have low overall quality and reliability scores. Independent physician and academic institution sources received higher mean scores for JAMA, GQS, and SSS. Video quality was not correlated with number of views.
Subject(s)
Shoulder Injuries , Social Media , United States , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Emotions , Health PersonnelABSTRACT
Reverse Hill-Sachs lesions (rHSLs) after chronic posterior shoulder instability are important to recognize and treat appropriately. Treatment options for posterior instability with rHSL in the current literature are primarily based on percentage of humeral bone loss. In cases of moderate (25% to 50%) anterolateral humeral head bone loss, fresh osteochondral allografts are preferred. Recent literature has indicated that the talus serves as a robust grafting alternative site for the humeral head, as the talar dome shows high congruency and offers variable sizes. The purpose of this Technical Note is, therefore, to describe our technique for talus allograft preparation for the treatment of a large rHSL that highlights precise cutting anatomy, sizing options, and use of orthobiologics to ensure excellent talus union to the native humeral head surface.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of YouTube videos as a patient education resource related to rehabilitation and return to play following medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. Methods: YouTube was queried using 6 predetermined search terms. Videos were included if they met the following criteria: (1) written in the English language; and (2) within the first 100 videos for each search term. Videos were excluded if they met any of the following criteria: (1) not written in the English language; (2) did not include medial patellofemoral ligament/MPFL in the title; (3) duplicate videos; (4) part of a multivideo series such a vlogs; (5) advertisements; and (6) videos <1 minute. The remaining videos were evaluated by 2 independent viewers and scored using 4 distinct scoring systems: Global Quality Scale, The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT), MPFL Rehabilitation and Return to Play Score, and the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria. The data was analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics, version 27). The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare quality scores and video analytics to their assigned categories. Results where P < .05 were considered statistically significant and pairwise comparison analysis was completed to determine the video categories with statistically significant differences. Correlation of categorical variables with video analytics (views, video power index, duration, and days since publication) and quality scores was determined using the Pearson Correlation coefficient. Results: Of the initial 600 videos, 58 met inclusion criteria, which were subsequently reviewed and scored. Most videos scored on the low-end of the possible scoring ranges with a mean Global Quality Scale score of 1.61 (standard deviation [SD] 0.81), PEMAT Understandability score of 59.40 (SD 17.54), PEMAT Actionability score of 18.20 (SD 29.92), MPFL Rehabilitation and Return to Play Score of 1.64 (SD 2.13), and Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark score of 2.08 (SD 0.75). Conclusions: The videos in YouTube's library received low scores in quality, reliability, understandability and actionability. Therefore, YouTube is currently a poor source of information for patients regarding postoperative rehabilitation and return to play following MPFL reconstruction. Clinical Relevance: Patients increasingly view medical information online. YouTube is second only to Google as the most used search engine. It is important to understand the quality of information patients receive on YouTube following MPFL reconstruction so orthopaedic surgeons know to guide patients to higher-quality alternatives.
