ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To determine whether a proximal tibiofibular joint dislocation (TFJD) increases lateral compartment gapping more than a fibular head osteotomy (FHO) during a closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO). The second objective was to determine whether lateral compartment gapping affects clinical outcomes. METHODS: A prospective randomized clinical study was carried out that included 18 patients in Group 1 (FHO) and 18 in Group 2 (TFJD). Varus-stress radiographs of all the patients with both knees at full extension and at 30 ° of flexion were studied pre-operatively and 12 months post-operatively. Lateral compartment gapping was measured in millimeters. The Knee Society Score (KSS) was used to assess clinical stability. RESULTS: The difference between the pre- and post-operative measurements relative to gapping in the lateral knee compartment at 0 ° of knee flexion was 1.3 mm (SD 1.8) in Group 1 and 4.5 mm (SD 2.4) in Group 2 (p = 0.006). At 30 ° of knee flexion, this difference was 1.9 mm (SD 1.2) in Group 1 and 5.2 mm (SD 3.1) in Group 2 (p = 0.01). No differences were observed in the pre- and post-operative period relative to gapping in healthy knees. Pre-operatively, both groups presented similar KSS knee values: Group 1 with 54.7 (SD 11.7), Group 2 with 54.8 (SD 11.1) (n.s.). Post-operatively, these values were also similar: Group 1 with 93.2 (SD 7.4), Group 2 with 93.5 (SD 5.5) (n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who have undergone a CWHTO, TFJ dislocation increases knee lateral compartment gapping when compared to an FHO at 0 ° and 30 ° of knee flexion. However, this fact seems to have no repercussion on the functional status of the knees as measured with the KSS at the one-year follow-up.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The measurement of plantar fascia thickness has been advocated as a diagnostic and prognostic instrument in patients with plantar fasciitis, but there are no data relative to it in recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. The aim of the study is to evaluate the correlation between plantar fascia thickness and pain, functional score, and health perception in patients with this condition. METHODS: Thirty-eight feet were studied with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging to measure plantar fascia thickness. The visual analogue scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Hindfoot Score (AOFAS), and SF-36 were then recorded for each patient. The relationship between the fascia and these scores was analyzed to evaluate the correlation of thickness with pain, functional level, and health perception of patients. RESULTS: In patients with recalcitrant plantar fasciitis, plantar fascia thickness did not correlate with pain (VAS), AOFAS, or any item of the SF-36. CONCLUSION: The thickness of the plantar fascia in patients with recalcitrant plantar fasciitis did not correlate with its clinical impact, and thus, we believe it should not be used in treatment planning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.
