ABSTRACT
Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for severe obesity, but complications and peri-operative monitoring are important considerations. We conducted a comprehensive review of studies assessing pre-operative biomarkers and complications in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. A total of 14 studies were included. Gastric leak, infections, bleeding, obstruction or stenosis, hypoglycemia, and hypoalbuminemia were the most common complications observed. Our analysis showed a significant association between lower pre-operative albumin levels and complications (SMD [95%CI] = - 0.21 [- 0.38; - 0.04]). However, other biomarkers did not have a significant impact on complication occurrence. Changes in C-reactive protein, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and white blood cell levels were observed in certain peri-operative time points and complication subgroups. These findings suggest the potential use of pre-operative biomarkers and peri-operative changes of biomarker's levels for predicting complications.
Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Biomarkers , Obesity, Morbid , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Biomarkers/blood , Bariatric Surgery/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/blood , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Obesity, Morbid/blood , Obesity, Morbid/complications , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Female , Predictive Value of TestsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Upper respiratory viral infections have long been considered triggers for multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse and exacerbation. The possible effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on MS relapse and deterioration remain controversial. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases to find relevant studies assessing changes in relapse rates or Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) following COVID-19 in people with MS. Meta-analyses were performed, and to investigate sources of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis, meta-regression, and sensitivity analysis were conducted. RESULTS: We included 14 studies in our systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated that COVID-19 was not associated with a rise in relapse rate (risk ratio (RR): 0.97, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.67, 1.41, p-value: 0.87) or a rise in EDSS (standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.09, 95 % CI: -0.22, 0.03, p-value: 0.13). The analysis of EDSS changes indicated a significant heterogeneity (I2: 55 %, p-value: 0.01). Other analyses were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 infection was not associated with an increased risk of relapse and clinical deterioration in people with MS.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multiple Sclerosis , Humans , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Multiple Sclerosis/epidemiology , Chronic Disease , RecurrenceABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Schizophrenia affects approximately 1% of the population worldwide. Multifactorial reasons, ranging from drug resistance to adverse effects of medications, have necessitated exploring further therapeutic options. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a novel high-frequency form of transcranial magnetic stimulation, a safe procedure with minor adverse effects with faster and longer-lasting poststimulation effects with a potential role in treating symptoms; however, the exact target brain regions and symptoms are still controversial. Therefore, we aimed to systematically investigate the current literature regarding the therapeutic utilities of iTBS using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Twelve studies were included among which 9 found iTBS effective to some degree. These studies targeted the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the midline cerebellum. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis on studies that compared the effects of iTBS on schizophrenia symptoms measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) to sham treatment. Our results showed no significant difference between iTBS and sham in PANSS positive and negative scores, but a trend-level difference in PANSS general scores ( k = 6, P = 0.07), and a significant difference in PANSS total scores ( k = 6, P = 0.03). Analysis of the studies targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex showed improvement in PANSS negative scores ( k = 5, standardized mean difference = -0.83, P = 0.049), but not in PANSS positive scores. Moderators (intensity, pulse, quality, sessions) did not affect the results. However, considering the small number of studies included in this meta-analysis, future works are required to further explore the effects of these factors and also find optimum target regions for positive symptoms.
