Immediate placement and loading of maxillary single-tooth implants: a 3-year prospective study of marginal bone level.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate marginal bone level around single-tooth implants placed in anterior maxilla and immediately restored. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty implants were placed in 20 patients (8 men and 12 women) that were selected for this study. Following atraumatic non-surgical extraction of tooth, all patients immediately received implants and the definitive prefabricated abutment was placed. Implant position was transferred to the scanning unit of the CAD/CAM system using prefabricated surgical guide. Temporary crowns were immediately fabricated and cemented. Eight weeks later final crowns were luted. Outcome assessment as implant survival and level of marginal bone radiographic evaluations were performed at 8 weeks, 1 and 3 years time period after loading. RESULTS: All implants placed osseointegrated successfully after 3 years of functional loading. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.16 mm (SD, 0.167 mm), 0.275 mm (SD, 0.171 mm) and 0.265 mm (SD, 0.171 mm) at 8 weeks, 1 and 3 years time period respectively. Four out of the 20 implants showed no bone loss. CONCLUSION: Immediate loading technique using the final abutment directly eliminated the need for a second stage surgery and prevented interruption of soft and hard tissue at implant neck, which resulted in better soft tissue response and reduced marginal bone loss. Clinical significance: Immediately loaded implants, in fresh extraction sockets by insertion of a provisional restoration on the titanium abutment without any later manipulation, helped to protect the initially forming blood clot and presented a template for soft tissue contouring that resulted in significant reduction of marginal bone resorption and maintenance of soft tissue architecture.

Influence of surgical and prosthetic techniques on marginal bone loss around titanium implants. Part I: immediate loading in fresh extraction sockets.

PURPOSE: Delayed placement of implant abutments has been associated with peri-implant marginal bone loss; however, long-term results obtained by modifying surgical and prosthetic techniques after implant placement are still lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the marginal bone loss around titanium implants placed in fresh extraction sockets using two loading protocols after a 5-year follow-up period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 36 patients received 40 titanium implants (Astra Tech) intended for single-tooth replacement. Implants were immediately placed into fresh extraction sockets using either a one-stage (immediate loading by placing an interim prosthesis into functional occlusion) or a two-stage prosthetic loading protocol (insertion of abutments after 8 weeks of healing time). Marginal bone levels relative to the implant reference point were evaluated at four time intervals using intraoral radiographs: at time of implant placement, and 1, 3, and 5 years after implant placement. Measurements were obtained from mesial and distal surfaces of each implant (α = 0.05). RESULTS: One-stage immediate implant placement into fresh extraction sockets resulted in a significant reduction in marginal bone loss (p < 0.002) compared to the traditional two-stage technique. Whereas mesial surfaces remained stable for the 5-year observation period, significant marginal bone loss was observed on distal surfaces of implants after cementation of interim prostheses (p < 0.007) and after 12 months (p < 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, immediate loading of implants placed into fresh extraction sockets reduced marginal bone loss and did not compromise the success rate of the restorations.

A 5-year comparison of marginal bone level following immediate loading of single-tooth implants placed in healed alveolar ridges and extraction sockets in the maxilla.

PURPOSE: The aim of present investigation was to evaluate marginal bone level after 5-year follow-up of implants placed in healed ridges and fresh extraction sockets in maxilla with immediate loading protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients in need of a single-tooth replacement in the anterior maxilla received 42 Astra Tech implants (Astra Tech Implant system™, Dentsply Implants, Mölndal, Sweden). Implants were placed either in healed ridges (group I) or immediately into fresh extraction sockets (group II). Implants were restored and placed into functional loading immediately by using a prefabricated abutment. Marginal bone level relative to the implant reference point was recorded at implant placement, crown cementation, 12, 36, and 60 months following loading using intra-oral radiographs. Measurements were made on the mesial and distal sides of each implant. RESULTS: Overall, two implants were lost from the group II, before final crown cementation: they were excluded from the study. The mean change in marginal bone loss (MBL) after implant placement was 0.26 ± 0.161 mm for 1 year, and 0.26 ± 0.171 mm for 3 years, and 0.21 ± 0.185 mm for 5 years in extraction sockets and was 0.26 ± 0.176 mm for 1 year and 0.21 ± 0.175 mm for 3 years, and 0.19 ± 0.172 mm for 5 years in healed ridges group. Significant reduction of marginal bone was more pronounced in implants inserted in healed ridges (P < 0.041) compared to fresh surgical extraction sockets (P < 0.540). Significant MBL was observed on the mesial side of the implant after cementation of the provisional (P < 0.007) and after 12 months (P < 0.034) compared to the distal side which remained stable for 3 and 5 years observation period. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, responses of local bone to immediately loaded implants placed either in extraction sockets or healed ridges were similar. Functional loading technique by using prefabricated abutment placed during the surgery time seems to maintain marginal bone around implant in both healed and fresh extraction sites.

Arthroscopy versus arthrocentesis. A retrospective study of disc displacement management without reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of arthroscopic surgery and arthrocentesis of internal derangement (disc displacement without reduction) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). METHODS: The charts of 48 patients with TMJ derangement and treated with arthroscopy or arthrocentesis were included in this study carried out in a specialized private clinic in Beirut, Lebanon, between January 2001 and July 2005. Inclusion criteria included patients with a history of clicking followed by a sudden onset of limited mouth opening without clicking, a complaint of TMJ pain with mouth opening or chewing difficulty, or both, or a positive magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of TMJ disc displacement without reduction. Patients with limited mouth opening caused by only muscle spasm, prior TMJ surgery, bilateral joint involvement, or serious systemic diseases were excluded from the study. Twenty-eight patients underwent arthroscopy (group one) and 20 patients were treated with arthrocentesis (group 2). RESULTS: Both methods showed a significant reduction in pain and an increase in maximal mouth opening on follow up (p<0.01). There was no statistical difference between the methods. CONCLUSION: Further research should be conducted before one can definitely determine if real benefits are achieved through surgery in TMJ articular disorders. Within the limits of this study, less invasive procedures are highly recommended.

Full-mouth rehabilitation following treatment of temporomandibular disorders and teeth-related signs and symptoms.

The literature is replete with theories regarding temporomandibular disorders (TMD). However, there is a paucity of information concerning perceived malocclusion and other teeth-related signs and symptoms after full-mouth rehabilitation. This clinical study was designed to evaluate the perception of TMD patients concerning perceived malocclusion and other teeth-related signs and symptoms after full-mouth rehabilitation guided by the Mental Analog Scale (MAS). Among 38 patients referred for full-mouth rehabilitation, 20 were diagnosed as having TMD after reviewing a questionnaire, recording the major complaints and symptoms, in addition to performing comprehensive clinical examination. Nonsurgical therapy was performed, including fabricating an anterior programming device, a centric relation occlusal device and finally full-mouth rehabilitation by means of placing crowns on all upper and/or lower teeth. All full-mouth rehabilitation procedures were performed using a fully adjustable articulator and mandibular movements were recorded following pantographic tracings. After full-mouth rehabilitation, the patients were followed up at 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12-month intervals, and the major signs and symptoms were recorded along with adjunctive teeth-related signs and symptoms. Fisher exact probability tests were applied to analyze the results (P<.05). Statistical comparisons of the MAS responses before and after treatment (at 1-month recall) showed significant improvement (P<.05) for all teeth-related signs and symptoms except for bruxism (P=.0699). Further improvement was noted at the 4-month recall period. However, these improvements were not statistically significant for all teeth-related signs and symptoms. No further change was noted after the 4-month recall period. There was a marked reduction in perceived malocclusion and adjunctive teeth-related signs and symptoms during function, only after performing occlusal equilibration of the final restorations.