Non-classical 1p36 deletion in a patient with Duane retraction syndrome: case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Monosomy of 1p36 is considered the most common terminal microdeletion syndrome. It is characterized by intellectual disability, growth retardation, seizures, congenital anomalies, and distinctive facial features that are absent when the deletion is proximal, beyond the 1p36.32 region. In patients with proximal deletions, little is known about the associated phenotype, since only a few cases have been reported in the literature. Ocular manifestations in patients with classical 1p36 monosomy are frequent and include strabismus, myopia, hypermetropia, and nystagmus. However, as of today only one patient with 1p36 deletion and Duane retraction syndrome (DRS) has been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a patient with intellectual disability, facial dysmorphism, and bilateral Duane retraction syndrome (DRS) type 1. Array CGH showed a 7.2 Mb de novo deletion from 1p36.31 to 1p36.21. DISCUSSION: Our patient displayed DRS, which is not part of the classical phenotype and is not a common clinical feature in 1p36 deletion syndrome; we hypothesized that this could be associated with the overlapping deletion between the distal and proximal 1p36 regions. DRS is one of the Congenital Cranial Dysinnervation Disorders, and a genetic basis for the syndrome has been extensively reported. The HES3 gene is located at 1p36.31 and could be associated with oculomotor alterations, including DRS, since this gene is involved in the development of the 3rd cranial nerve and the 6th cranial nerve's nucleus. We propose that oculomotor anomalies, including DRS, could be related to proximal 1p36 deletion, warranting a detailed ophthalmologic evaluation of these patients.

Nonclonal Chromosome Aberrations and Genome Chaos in Somatic and Germ Cells from Patients and Survivors of Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Anticancer regimens for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients include highly genotoxic drugs that have been very successful in killing tumor cells and providing a 90% disease-free survival at five years. However, some of these treatments do not have a specific cell target, damaging both cancerous and normal cells. Thus, HL survivors have a high risk of developing new primary cancers, both hematologic and solid tumors, which have been related to treatment. Several studies have shown that after treatment, HL patients and survivors present persistent chromosomal instability, including nonclonal chromosomal aberrations. The frequency and type of chromosomal abnormalities appear to depend on the type of therapy and the cell type examined. For example, MOPP chemotherapy affects hematopoietic and germ stem cells leading to long-term genotoxic effects and azoospermia, while ABVD chemotherapy affects transiently sperm cells, with most of the patients showing recovery of spermatogenesis. Both regimens have long-term effects in somatic cells, presenting nonclonal chromosomal aberrations and genomic chaos in a fraction of noncancerous cells. This is a source of karyotypic heterogeneity that could eventually generate a more stable population acquiring clonal chromosomal aberrations and leading towards the development of a new cancer.

Genetic abnormalities in leukemia secondary to treatment in patients with Hodgkin's disease.

Hodgkin's disease has been treated mainly with two chemotherapy schedules, MOPP (nitrogen mustard, Oncovin, procarbazine and prednisone), which includes alkylating agents, and ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine), which includes topoisomerase II inhibitors, either with or without radiation therapy. Due to the types of agents used, patients with Hodgkin's disease often develop secondary leukemias. The alkylating agents included in the MOPP scheme were the first drugs associated with the development of therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (t-MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML); both entities are the result of the clonal selection of cells with accumulated genomic lesions induced by antineoplastic therapy. In patients who developed t-MDS and t-AML, eight alternative routes with specific cytogenetic and molecular changes have been identified, and the routes are related to the type of therapy, alkylating agents or DNA topoisomerase II inhibitors. At the cytogenetic level, patients treated with alkylating agents show deletion 5q/monosomy 5 and deletion 7q/monosomy 7; in contrast, those who were treated with topoisomerase II inhibitors show 11q23 translocations involving the MLL gene. At the molecular level, there are two types of mutations: Class I, which alter the RAS-BRAF signal transduction pathways and increase cell proliferation; Class II, which disrupt genes that encode transcription factors and NPM1 that are involved in cell differentiation, and the inactivation of p53 tumor suppressor gene. Knowledge of the genetic alterations in these conditions is important for the classification, treatment and prognosis of patients as well as essential for increasing the knowledge of the biology of these diseases, which leads to identifying potential therapeutic targets.

Analysis of gene rearrangements using a fluorescence in situ hybridization method in Mexican patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: experience at a single institution.

We evaluated the prevalence of BCR/ABL, MLL, and ETV6/RUNX1 rearrangements as well as CDKN2A (alias p16) deletion in a group of Mexican children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) to determine whether the changes coexist, and to compare the incidences found with other reports in the literature. To increase the detection of these abnormalities, we combined conventional cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. Bone marrow samples were obtained from 59 consecutive children with ALL. FISH detected a total of 63 abnormalities with the selected probes, 34 of which were related to the conventional cytogenetic results. The most common abnormality was the p16 deletion (22.8%), followed by MLL and ETV6/RUNX1 rearrangements (8.7%), and the BCR/ABL fusion was the least frequent (2.7%). The coexistence of two recurrent abnormalities with specific prognostic significance in the same patient was not found. A lesser proportion of the p16 deletion in T-ALL patients was observed, probably related to the low prevalence of this subtype in our population. In addition, we confirmed the low frequency of the ETV6/RUNX1 fusion observed in Hispanics. Due to the different prevalence of these abnormalities in the Mexican population, similar studies should be conducted analyzing new rearrangements, to improve the adequate classification of the abnormalities and the stratification in prognostic groups.