A Preliminary Examination of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Versus Exposure and Response Prevention for Patients with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder on an Optimal Dose of SSRIs: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Iran.

This study compared the effects of adding acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) or exposure and response prevention (ERP) to adults diagnosed with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) already on an optimal and stable dose of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Forty adults on SSRIs who were diagnosed with OCD participated in a randomized controlled trial in Iran of 12 individual weekly sessions of either ACT+SSRI, ERP+SSRI, or continued SSRI only. The results showed significant reductions in OCD symptom severity in ACT+SSRI and ERP+SSRI conditions at posttreatment with significantly greater reductions in both conditions compared to SSRI-only at follow-up. Additionally, psychological inflexibility and use of thought control strategies significantly decreased in the ACT+SSRI condition at posttreatment and follow-up compared to the ERP+SSRI and SSRI conditions. Both conditions led to decreases in perceived importance of stop signals. Results provide cross-cultural support for the treatment of OCD using ACT and ERP as adjuncts to SSRI and modest process of change differences between ACT and ERP. Future directions and study limitations are discussed.

Comparison of early maladaptive schemas and parenting origins in patients with opioid abuse and non-abusers.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the difference of early maladaptive schemas and parenting origins in opioid abusers and non-opioid abusers. METHOD: The early maladaptive schemas and parenting origins were compared in 56 opioid abusers and 56 non-opioids abusers. Schemas were assessed by the Young Schema Questionnaire 3rd (short form); and parenting origins were assessed by the Young Parenting Inventory. RESULTS: Data were analyzed by multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The analysis showed that the means for schemas between opioid abusers and non-opioid abusers were different. Chi square test showed that parenting origins were significantly associated with their related schemas. CONCLUSION: The early maladaptive schemas and parenting origins in opioid abusers were more than non-opioid abusers; and parenting origins were related to their Corresponding schemas.

Reliability, validity and factor structure of the GDS-15 in Iranian elderly.

OBJECTIVES: Depressive disorders are a public health problem even in developing countries. Access to valid and reliable screening instruments is needed for conducting community surveys. The main objective of this study is to provide the Iranian version of the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS). METHODS: The GDS-15 Farsi version was developed by translation and back translation. Two hundred and four subjects aged 59 years or older, who were chosen randomly from residents of the Ekbatan district of Tehran, the capital city of Iran, completed the GDS-15. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) was used to establish a gold standard diagnosis of major depressive disorders. RESULTS: The GDS was found to be an internally consistent measure. Alpha, split-half coefficients and test-retest reliability were 0.9, 0.89 and 0.58 respectively. Two factors were extracted by using factor analysis and the principle component analysis (varimax rotation): 'depression' and 'psychosocial activity'. The Depression factor (omitting items 2, 9, 10, 13), which could be considered as a short form of the scale (alpha = 0.92), has significant correlation with the main scale (r = 0.58). Using receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis, the optimum cutoff score for GDS-15 is 7/8, yielding a sensitivity of 0.9 and a specificity of 0.84. The optimum cutoff score for GDS-11 is 6, yielding a sensitivity of 0.9 and a specificity of 0.83. CONCLUSION: The long and short forms of the GDS have excellent properties as screening instruments for major depression in older dwellers in Iran, particularly in urban areas, as presented in our findings.

Responsibility attitude in a sample of Iranian obsessive-compulsive patients.

BACKGROUND: The study of distorted beliefs about responsibility attitude and interpretation has become the central theme in Salkovskis' (1985) and Rachman and Hodgson's (1980) models of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). AIMS: The aim of this research is to assess the responsibility attitude in Iranian OCD patients. METHODS: Twenty OCD patients were selected through available sampling from the case referred to psychology clinics. Two other patient groups comprised of 20 non-OCD anxiety disorder patients and 20 non-clinical participants were also chosen as comparison groups. All participants completed the Responsibility Attitude Scale (RAS) and Responsibility Interpretation Questionnaire (RIQ). RESULTS: Analyses revealed statistically significant differences between OCD group and comparison groups on both RAS and RIQ. In addition, both RAS and RIQ scores were associated with the severity of OCD assessed by the Yale-Brown scale. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that responsibility attitude and interpretations are the prominent features of OCD in Iranian patients and are associated with the severity of illness.