ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of specialized training for nurses on selective screening for undetected HIV infection in the emergency department. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The intervention group was comprised of 6 emergency departments that had been participating in a screening program (the "Urgències VIHgila" project) for at least 3 months. Nurses on all shifts attended training sessions that emphasized understanding the circumstances that should lead to suspicion of unidentified HIV infection and the need to order serology. Two studies were carried out: 1) a quasi-experimental pre-post study to compare the number of orders for HIV serology in each time period and measures of sensitivity, and 2) a case-control study to compare the changes made in the 6 hospitals where specialized training was provided (cases) vs 6 control hospitals in the HIV screening program where no training was given. RESULTS: A total of 280 HIV serologies were ordered for the 81015 patients (0.3%) attended during the period before training; 331 serologies were ordered for the 79620 patients in the period after training (0.4%). The relative increase in serologies was 20.3% (95% CI, 2.9% to 34.5%; P = .022). The relative increase in measures of sensitivity ranged between 19% and 39%, consistent with the main comparison. Serologies in the control group decreased between periods, from 0.9% to 0.8%, indicating a relative decrease of 15.7% (95% CI, -25.1% to -6.2%; P = .001). The absolute number of patients tested in the training group was 0.2% higher in the training hospitals (95% CI, 0.11% to 0.31%; P .001) than in the control hospitals. CONCLUSION: Training nurses to screen for undetected HIV infection in the emergency department increased the number of patients tested, according to the pre-post and case-control comparisons.
OBJETIVO: Evaluar el impacto de una formación específica para enfermería en el servicio urgencias (SU) sobre el despistaje selectivo de infección por VIH oculta. METODO: Participaron 6 SU adheridos al programa "Urgències VIHgila" con un mínimo de 3 meses y se realizaron sesiones formativas para los diferentes turnos. Las sesiones enfatizaban en qué circunstancias debía sospecharse infección oculta VIH y la necesidad de solicitar serología. Se realizaron dos estudios: 1) cuasiexperimental pre/post, que comparó la tasa de solicitudes VIH entre ambos periodos, con diversos análisis de sensibilidad; 2) caso-control, que comparó el cambio entre periodos de los 6 SU con formación (caso) con el cambio en otros 6 SU que no tuvieron formación (control). RESULTADOS: Se realizaron serologías de VIH a 280 de los 81.015 pacientes atendidos durante el periodo preintervención (0,3%) y a 331 de los 79.620 del periodo posintervención (0,4%). El incremento relativo fue del 20,3% (IC 95% de +2,9% a +34,5%; p = 0,022). Los análisis de sensibilidad mostraron incrementos relativos congruentes con el análisis principal (entre 19% y 39%). En el grupo control hubo descenso de solicitudes entre periodos, del 0,9% al 0,8% (descenso relativo del 15,7%, IC 95% de 25,1% a6,2%; p = 0,001). El grupo caso, en relación con el grupo control, tuvo un incremento absoluto de 0,2% (IC 95% de +0,11 a +0,31%, p 0,001) de pacientes testados. CONCLUSIONES: La formación de enfermería para despistaje de la infección VIH oculta en urgencias incrementa el número de pacientes investigados, tanto comparado con el periodo previo a la formación como comparado con SU sin formación específica para enfermería.
Subject(s)
Emergency Nursing , Emergency Service, Hospital , HIV Infections , Humans , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Emergency Nursing/education , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Adult , Middle Aged , Nursing Staff, Hospital/education , Spain , AIDS Serodiagnosis , Controlled Before-After StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe other reasons for requesting HIV serology in emergency departments (ED) other than the 6 defined in the SEMES-GESIDA consensus document (DC-SEMES-GESIDA) and to analyze whether it would be efficient to include any of them in the future. METHODS: Review of all HIV serologies performed during 2 years in 20 Catalan EDs. Serologies requested for reasons not defined by the DC-SEMES-GESIDA were grouped by common conditions, the prevalence (IC95%) of seropositivity for each condition was calculated, and those whose 95% confidence lower limit was >0.1% were considered efficient. Sensitivity analysis considered that serology would have been performed on 20% of cases attended and the remaining 80% would have been seronegative. RESULTS: There were 8044 serologies performed for 248 conditions not recommended by DC-SEMES-GESIDA, in 17 there were seropositive, and in 12 the performance of HIV serology would be efficient. The highest prevalence of detection corresponded to patients from endemic countries (7.41%, 0.91-24.3), lymphopenia (4.76%, 0.12-23.8), plateletopenia (4.37%, 1.20-10.9), adenopathy (3.45%, 0.42-11.9), meningoencephalitis (3.12%, 0.38-10.8) and drug use (2.50%, 0.68-6.28). Sensitivity analysis confirmed efficiency in 6 of them: endemic country origin, plateletopenia, drug abuse, toxic syndrome, behavioral-confusional disorder-agitation and fever of unknown origin. CONCLUSION: The DC-SEMES-GESIDA targeted HIV screening strategy in the ED could efficiently include other circumstances not previously considered; the most cost-effective would be origin from an endemic country, plateletopenia, drug abuse, toxic syndrome, behavioral-confusional-agitation disorder and fever of unknown origin.
ABSTRACT
We report the repair of a double aortic arch, coarctation of the aorta, and left subclavian artery (LSCA) aneurysm using a hybrid procedure in a 47-year-old woman. The patient underwent repair through a median sternotomy incision to bypass the left common carotid artery and LSCA. An endovascular approach was used to repair the coarctation of the aorta and to occlude the right aortic arch. Repair of this anomaly was advised because of worsening clinical symptoms and potential for fatal rupture or dissection of the LSCA aneurysm. Hybrid repair simplified what would have required a multistage open repair.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Internal jugular vein extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cannula position is traditionally confirmed via plain film. Misplaced cannulae can result in need for repositioning and increased morbidity. Echocardiography (ECHO) may be used during cannulation as a more accurate means of guiding cannula position. This study reviews the effect of a protocol encouraging the use of ECHO at cannulation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Single institution retrospective review of patients who received ECMO support using jugular venous cannulation. We compared those who underwent ECHO (ECHO+) at the time of cannulation with those who did not (ECHO-). RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were included: 26 ECHO+, 63 ECHO-. Most ECHO+ patients underwent dual-lumen veno-venous (VV) cannulation (65%); 32% of ECHO- patients had VV support (P = 0.003). There was no difference in the rate of cannula repositioning between the two groups: 8% ECHO+ and 10% ECHO-, P = 0.78. In the VV ECMO subgroup, ECHO+ patients required no repositioning (0/17), while 20% (4/20) of ECHO- VV patients did (P = 0.10). After cannulation, there were 0.58 ECHO studies per patient to verify cannula position in the ECHO+ group compared with 0.22 in the ECHO- group (P = 0.02). Each group had a major mechanical complication: atrial perforation from a guidewire during cannulation in ECHO+ and late atrial perforation from a loose cannula in ECHO-, and there was no difference in minor complications. CONCLUSIONS: ECHO guidance during neonatal and pediatric jugular cannulation for ECMO did not decrease morbidity or reduce the need for cannula repositioning. ECHO may still be a useful adjunct for precise placement of a dual-lumen VV cannula and during difficult cannulations.
