Why your doctor is not an algorithm: Exploring logical principles of different clinical inference methods using liver transplantation as a model. / ¿Por qué mi médico no es un algoritmo? Fundamentos lógicos de los diferentes métodos de inferencia clínica a través del ejemplo del trasplante hepático.

The development of machine learning (ML) tools in many different medical settings is largely increasing. However, the use of the resulting algorithms in daily medical practice is still an unsolved challenge. We propose an epistemological approach (i.e., based on logical principles) to the application of computational tools in clinical practice. We rely on the classification of scientific inference into deductive, inductive, and abductive comparing the characteristics of ML tools with those derived from evidence-based medicine [EBM] and experience-based medicine, as paradigms of well-known methods for generation of knowledge. While we illustrate our arguments using liver transplantation as an example, this approach can be applied to other aspects of the specialty. Regarding EBM, it generates general knowledge that clinicians apply deductively, but the certainty of its conclusions is not guaranteed. In contrast, automatic algorithms primarily rely on inductive reasoning. Their design enables the integration of vast datasets and mitigates the emotional biases inherent in human induction. However, its poor capacity for abductive inference (a logical mechanism inherent to human clinical experience) constrains its performance in clinical settings characterized by uncertainty, where data are heterogeneous, results are highly influenced by context, or where prognostic factors can change rapidly.

Tacrolimus as an Effective and Durable Second-Line Treatment for Chronic Autoimmune Hepatitis: A Multicentric Study.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease able to progress to acute liver failure, cirrhosis, and liver cancer. A significant proportion of patients fail to first-line therapy or develop severe toxicity. AIMS: To assess safety and effectiveness of tacrolimus as a second-line therapy in AIH patients. METHODS: Multicentric retrospective study of AIH patients treated with tacrolimus for at least 3 months as a second-line therapy. Effectiveness was defined as complete normalization of transaminases and IgG. RESULTS: A total of 23 AIH patients were included in the final analysis. In 13% of patients tacrolimus was initiated because of toxicity to previous first-line treatments and the rest were switched because of previous non-efficacy. Tacrolimus was effective in 18 patients (78%; 95%CI: 55.20-91.92%). The median time receiving tacrolimus was 16 months (IQR 20). There was a sustained response with a significant improvement in all liver enzymes and IgG on last follow-up. Only one patient discontinued tacrolimus at the third month because of severe neuropathy, and ototoxicity. Responders were significantly older at diagnosis of AIH (41 ± 13 vs. 27 ± 10 years old; p = 0.0496). CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus is effective and well tolerated as a second-line therapy in patients with AIH.

Long-term outcomes and clinical impact of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) after liver transplantation: a prospective study in a pilot cohort.

INTRODUCTION: the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is thought to affect survival of the allograft and patient after liver transplantation (LT). However, their significance is not well understood. PATIENTS AND METHODS: a prospective study was performed of 32 adult patients who underwent LT in 2011 to analyze the existence of DSA, associated risk factors and medium-term impact. Immunological determinations were performed immediately before LT and at three, six, 12 months and five years after LT. RESULTS: eight patients (24.2 %) presented pre-formed DSA. However, titers were negative in all patients five years after LT and there were no associated events. Eight out of 24 patients (33.3 %) developed de novo DSA. After five years, only two remained positive; both were class II with high mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values at diagnosis (over 15,000). No association was found between the development of DSA and the risk of rejection, graft loss or death. However, an increase in liver stiffness values was observed in patients with persistent DSA, and focal sinusoidal deposition of C4d and moderate liver fibrosis were reported. CONCLUSION: the incidence of DSA is high after LT. In addition, the persistence of de novo DSA could be associated with silent liver fibrosis with a potential impact on graft outcomes.

Recomendaciones de uso de everolimus en el trasplante hepático / Recommendations of everolimus use in liver transplant

Los fármacos inhibidores de la mTOR, everolimus (EVL) y sirolimus, son inmunosupresores con muy poco efecto nefrotóxico, limitado al desarrollo de proteinuria en algunos casos. En la prevención del rechazo agudo EVL combinado con tacrolimus a dosis reducidas tiene una eficacia y seguridad comparables a la inmunosupresión estándar con tacrolimus. La aplicación temprana de una inmunosupresión basada en EVL con minimización de la exposición al inmunosupresor calcineurínico en trasplantados hepáticos permite mejorar los resultados de la función renal, con tasas similares de eficacia y seguridad, tanto en el período de novo como de mantenimiento. En pacientes con disfunción renal establecida la introducción de EVL permite minimizar la exposición al inmunosupresor calcineurínico, con la consiguiente mejoría en la función renal. Aunque no hay evidencia suficiente para recomendar su uso para prevenir la recurrencia del hepatocarcinoma y la progresión de tumores de novo, es práctica clínica habitual utilizarlos en este contexto (AU)

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, everolimus (EVL) and sirolimus are immunosuppressive agents with a minor nephrotoxic effect, limited to the development of proteinuria in some cases. The combination of EVL and low-dose tacrolimus has proven to be as safe and effective as standard therapy with tacrolimus for the prevention of acute cellular rejection. Early initiation of EVL-based immunosuppressive regimens with reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors has been shown to significantly improve renal function of LT recipients during induction and maintenance phases, with comparable efficacy and safety profiles. In patients with established kidney failure, initiating EVL may enable clinicians to reduce calcineurin inhibitors exposure, thereby contributing to the improved renal function of these patients. Although there is not sufficient evidence to recommend their use to prevent the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma and the progression of de novo tumours, they are used in this context in routine clinical practice (AU)

Recommendations of everolimus use in liver transplant. / Recomendaciones de uso de everolimus en el trasplante hepático.

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, everolimus (EVL) and sirolimus are immunosuppressive agents with a minor nephrotoxic effect, limited to the development of proteinuria in some cases. The combination of EVL and low-dose tacrolimus has proven to be as safe and effective as standard therapy with tacrolimus for the prevention of acute cellular rejection. Early initiation of EVL-based immunosuppressive regimens with reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors has been shown to significantly improve renal function of LT recipients during induction and maintenance phases, with comparable efficacy and safety profiles. In patients with established kidney failure, initiating EVL may enable clinicians to reduce calcineurin inhibitors exposure, thereby contributing to the improved renal function of these patients. Although there is not sufficient evidence to recommend their use to prevent the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma and the progression of de novo tumours, they are used in this context in routine clinical practice.

Pseudo-pseudoxantoma elástico inducido por D-penicilamina en un paciente con enfermedad de Wilson: ¿qué puede hacer el hepatólogo? / Penicillamine induced pseudo-pseudoxanthoma elasticum in a patient with Wilson's disease, which role plays the hepatologist?

No disponible

Mucormicosis cutánea como complicación poco frecuente de trasplante hepático / Cutaneous mucormycosis as a rare complication of a liver transplantation

No disponible

Cardiovascular toxicity and sorafenib: a case report.

We report a case of a 55-year-old male with chronic hepatitis C virus infection and compensated liver disease treated with sorafenib for advanced hepatocarcinoma (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C). At follow-up, the patient developed hypertension, which was well controlled with beta-blocker medication, and an aortic dilation detected by abdominal computerized tomography and echocardiography. There are some reports of the side effects of sorafenib on the cardiovascular system. The patient had no cardiac or aortic pathology before the start of this palliative chemotherapy. There is an article that describes the development of an aortic aneurysm in a patient with uncontrolled hypertension, who received treatment with sorafenib for renal carcinoma. However, our patient had a good control of blood pressure. The adverse vascular effects of Sorafenib may be due to the inhibition of the proliferation of vascular endothelial muscle cells. We believe that this case illustrates a probable relationship between sorafenib and aortic dilatation according to the Karch and Lasagna causality algorithm.

Antiangiogenic drugs and cardiogenic shock: a case report.

A 56-year-old man attended the emergency room with respiratory failure, deteriorated general status, fatigue, and diarrhea. His clinical history included a liver transplant because of alcoholic cirrhosis, which developed to hepatocellular carcinoma. Initial immunosuppression consisted of corticosteroids, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Examination of the explant revealed vascular invasion, and tacrolimus was replaced with everolimus. The patient presented recurrence of the carcinoma with peritoneal implants, and treatment with sorafenib was started. He was admitted to the gastroenterology department and, after withdrawal of sorafenib, the patient improved clinically. However, 6 days later, he was admitted to the intensive care unit with acute respiratory failure and metabolic acidosis. The final diagnosis was cardiogenic shock. Although cardiogenic shock is not mentioned in the summaries of product characteristics of sorafenib or everolimus, there are reports of a relationship between cardiotoxicity and antiangiogenic therapy that inhibits the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells, as is the case with these drugs. We believe that there is a relationship between sorafenib (especially when combined with everolimus) and cardiogenic shock. Application of the Karch and Lasagna algorithm to assess the causality of the reaction induced by the combination of sorafenib and everolimus revealed the relationship to be probable.