ABSTRACT
Learning, memory, and recovery from various neurological insults occur by a process known as neuroplasticity. Neuroplastic changes occur by a variety of physiological processes that modify central nervous system structure and function. The ability to non-invasively induce neuroplastic change in humans is developing as an exciting new field in neuroscience and may ultimately improve treatment outcomes for those suffering various neurological conditions reliant on neuroplasticity for recovery of function. The induction of neuroplastic changes is influenced by several factors, and do not occur evenly throughout the day, but appear to be under circadian control. This review will discuss the known mechanisms and techniques used to induce neuroplasticity, circadian modulation of neuroplasticity, and will discuss the potential implications of these findings for human neurorehabilitation.
Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Animals , Circadian Rhythm/drug effects , Humans , Neuronal Plasticity/drug effects , Neurotransmitter Agents/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Motor cortex excitability was assessed in 12 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Patients were studied when mobile and medicated ("ON") and when immobile after medication withdrawal ("OFF"). Results were compared to eight age-matched and 11 young controls. Cortical excitability was assessed by measurement of resting motor threshold (RMT), intracortical inhibition and cortical silent period duration. In five patients, the studies included assessments following pallidotomy. Cortical excitability was abnormal in patients with PD with reduced RMT in "ON" and "OFF" states, and less effective intracortical inhibition. Pallidotomy did not affect cortical excitability in either "ON" or "OFF" states, indicating that enhanced motor cortex excitability in patients with PD is unaffected by pallidotomy despite clinical improvement in motor scores.
Subject(s)
Motor Cortex/physiopathology , Neural Inhibition/physiology , Pallidotomy/methods , Parkinson Disease/surgery , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Electromyography/methods , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Functional Laterality , Humans , Middle Aged , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Parkinson Disease/pathology , Reaction Time , Sensory Thresholds/physiology , Statistics, Nonparametric , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Young AdultABSTRACT
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to assess the relative contribution of the corticospinal (CS) pathway in activating the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle in each hand of 16 right- (RH) and 16 left-handed (LH) subjects with varied degrees of hand preference. It was hypothesised that asymmetry in corticospinal activation of the two hands may be related to hand preference and interlimb differences in manual performance. Subjects performed isometric index finger abduction at force levels of 0.5 N, 1 N and 2 N while TMS was applied at resting threshold intensity (T), 0.9T, or 0.8T. The amount of contraction-induced facilitation of the muscle evoked potential (MEP) was used as an estimate of corticospinal involvement in the task. Patterns of MEP facilitation in each hand were compared with measures of manual performance (finger tapping speed, Purdue pegboard, maximal FDI strength). Threshold TMS intensities for an MEP in FDI at rest were similar in LH and RH subjects, and did not vary between hands. Facilitation of the MEP with voluntary activation was larger overall on the left side (P<0.05), but the asymmetry was dependent on the degree of lateralisation of hand preference. For subjects with consistent hand preference (either LH or RH), MEP facilitation in active FDI was larger for the left hand. For non-consistent RH subjects, contraction-induced MEP facilitation was larger in the right FDI muscle than the left. Asymmetry of MEP facilitation was not correlated with differences between hands in finger tapping speed or performance in the pegboard task, but was associated with relative differences in FDI strength. MEP facilitation tended to be larger in the stronger FDI muscle of the pair. We conclude that corticospinal involvement in the command for index finger abduction is generally greater when the left hand is used, although in RH subjects the asymmetry is influenced by the degree of lateralisation of hand preference. The corticospinal asymmetry is not related to speed or dexterity of finger movements, but the association with muscle strength suggests that it may be influenced in part by preferential use of one hand for tasks which strengthen the FDI muscle.