Prospective comparison of sevoflurane and desflurane in formerly premature infants undergoing inguinal herniotomy.

BACKGROUND: Formerly premature infants having inguinal herniotomy have been at a high risk of postoperative apnoea, newer less soluble anaesthetic agents may reduce this risk. METHODS: Thirty infants, under 37 weeks gestation and under 47 weeks post-conceptional age, undergoing inguinal herniotomy had an inhalational induction with sevoflurane and were randomly allocated to sevoflurane (group S) or desflurane (group D) for maintenance. All infants received i.v. atracurium 0.5 mg kg(-1), rectal acetaminophen 20 mg kg(-1) and caudal bupivacaine 0.25% 1 ml kg(-1). Infants were monitored for apnoeas (using nasal thermistry and impedance), haemoglobin oxygen desaturations and bradycardias for 12 h before and after operation with an Alice 4 polysomnograph. Emergence timings were recorded. RESULTS: There was no difference between pre- and postoperative incidence of apnoeas in either group, and no group difference between desflurane and sevoflurane in terms of pre- and postoperative ventilatory events or in the number of apnoeas in the postoperative period (nine patients in group D and five patients in group S had apnoeas). Median times to first movement, tracheal extubation, eye opening and first cry were all faster with group D (group D: 3.0, 10.0, 9.0 and 11.0 min and group S: 7.0, 15.1, 13.5 and 16.1 min, respectively). No infant had problems with airway irritation on emergence and no infant required airway intervention for apnoea. CONCLUSIONS: Infants wake faster from general anaesthesia when maintained with desflurane as compared with sevoflurane, but no difference in postoperative respiratory events was demonstrated between the groups.

Emergence and recovery in children after desflurane and isoflurane anaesthesia: effect of anaesthetic duration.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that increasing duration of inhalation anaesthesia is associated with slower emergence and recovery in children, and that this effect would be less marked with desflurane in comparison with isoflurane. METHODS: Fifty-four infants and children assigned in groups according to age and expected length of operation were prospectively randomized to receive either isoflurane (I) or desflurane (D) for anaesthesia. After standard induction, the anaesthesia was maintained using an age-related 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) equivalent for either agent in air and oxygen. Local analgesia was used as appropriate. End-tidal volatile agent concentration was recorded until extubation. Clinical evaluation of recovery was made by observers, blinded to group allocation. RESULTS: For patients <4 yr of age, the median (95% CI) times in minutes to first movement [5.27 (D), 9.22 (I)], eye opening [9.42(D), 13.3(I)] and extubation [7.18 (D), 12.5 (I)] were significantly shorter (P<0.05) for desflurane. In the group >4 yr of age, the median (95% CI) times in minutes to first movement [4.42 (D), 11.6 (I)], eye opening [8.55(D), 18.0(I)] and extubation [7.08 (D), 16.7 (I)] were significantly shorter (P<0.001) for desflurane. Times to leave recovery were not significantly different for the group <4 yr of age, but were significantly shorter for desflurane in the group >4 yr of age (P<0.01). The isoflurane, but not desflurane, had a time-dependent effect on arousal. There were no significant differences in incidence of airway irritation or emergence delirium between the two agents. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of recovery in children after exposure to desflurane was faster than those patients receiving isoflurane; recovery from desflurane, but not isoflurane, was relatively unaffected by the duration of anaesthesia.