Core sepsis-related competencies for medical students: an international consensus by Delphi technique.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition which may arise from infection in any organ system and requires early recognition and management. Healthcare professionals working in any specialty may need to manage patients with sepsis. Educating medical students about this condition may be an effective way to ensure all future doctors have sufficient ability to diagnose and treat septic patients. However, there is currently no consensus on what competencies medical students should achieve regarding sepsis recognition and treatment. This study aims to outline what sepsis-related competencies medical students should achieve by the end of their medical student training in both high or upper-middle incomes countries/regions and in low or lower-middle income countries/regions. METHODS: Two separate panels from high or upper-middle income and low or lower-middle income countries/regions participated in a Delphi method to suggest and rank sepsis competencies for medical students. Each panel consisted of 13-18 key stakeholders of medical education and doctors in specialties where sepsis is a common problem (both specialists and trainees). Panelists came from all continents, except Antarctica. RESULTS: The panels reached consensus on 38 essential sepsis competencies in low or lower-middle income countries/regions and 33 in high or upper-middle incomes countries/regions. These include competencies such as definition of sepsis and septic shock and urgency of antibiotic treatment. In the low or lower-middle income countries/regions group, consensus was also achieved for competencies ranked as very important, and was achieved in 4/5 competencies rated as moderately important. In the high or upper-middle incomes countries/regions group, consensus was achieved in 41/57 competencies rated as very important but only 6/11 competencies rated as moderately important. CONCLUSION: Medical schools should consider developing curricula to address essential competencies, as a minimum, but also consider addressing competencies rated as very or moderately important.

Developing a research question: A research primer for low- and middle-income countries.

As demand for emergency care (EC) systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) grows, there is an urgent need to expand the evidence base for clinical and systems interventions in resource limited EC settings. Clinicians are well placed to identify, define and address unanswered research questions using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. This paper summarises established research priorities for global EC and provides a step-wise approach to developing a research question. Research priorities for global EC broadly fall into two categories: systems-based research and research with a clinical care focus. Systems research is integral to understanding the essential components of safe and effective EC delivery, while clinical research aims to answer questions related to particular disease states, presentations or population groups. Developing a specific research question requires an enquiring, questioning and critical approach to EC delivery. In quantitative research, use of the PECO formula (Population, Exposure, Comparator, Outcome) can help frame a research question. Qualitative research, which aims to understand, explore and examine, often requires application of a theoretical framework. Writing a brief purpose statement can be a helpful tool to clarify the objectives of a qualitative study. This paper includes lists of tips, pitfalls and resources to assist EC clinical researchers in developing research questions. Application of these tools and frameworks will assist EC clinicians in resource limited settings to perform impactful research and improve outcomes for patients with acute illness and injury.

A Pacific needs analysis model: a proposed methodology for assessing the needs of facility-based emergency care in the Pacific region.

BACKGROUND: Emergency care (EC) describes team-based, multidisciplinary clinical service provision, advocacy and health systems strengthening to address all urgent aspects of illness and injury for all people. In order to improve facility-based EC delivery, a structured framework is necessary to outline current capacity and future needs. This paper draws on examples of EC Needs Assessments performed at the national hospitals of three different Pacific Island Countries (PICs), to describe the development, implementation and validation of a structured assessment tool and methodological approach to conducting an EC Needs Assessment in the Pacific region. METHODS: This is a retrospective, descriptive analysis of the development of the Pacific Emergency Care Assessment (PECA) table using patient-focused principles within an EC systems framework. Tool implementation occurred through observation, literature review and interviews using a strengths-based, action-research and ethnographic methodological approach in Timor-Leste, Kiribati and the Solomon Islands. The 2014 Solomon Islands EC Needs Assessment provides the main context to illustrate and discuss the overall conduct, feasibility, validity and reliability of the PECA tool and methodological approach. RESULTS: In each site, the methodological implementation enabled completion of both the PECA table and comprehensive report within approximately 6 weeks of first arriving in country. Reports synthesising findings, recommendations, priority action areas and strategies were distributed widely amongst stakeholders. Examples illustrate Face and Content, Construct and Catalytic validity, including subsequent process and infrastructure improvements triggered by the EC Needs Assessment in each site. Triangulation of information and consistency of use over time enhanced reliability of the PECA tool. Compared to other EC assessment models, the Pacific approach enabled rich data on capacity and real-life function of EC facilities. The qualitative, strengths-based method engenders long-term partnerships and positive action, but takes time and requires tailoring to a specific site. CONCLUSION: In PICs and other global contexts where EC resources are underdeveloped, a PECA-style approach to conducting an EC Needs Assessment can trigger positive change through high local stakeholder engagement. Testing this qualitative implementation method with a standardised EC assessment tool in other limited resource contexts is the next step to further improve global EC.

Effective triage in the Pacific region: The development and implementation of the Solomon Islands Triage Scale.

OBJECTIVE: The ED at the National Referral Hospital in Honiara, Solomon Islands, receives approximately 50 000 patients per year. A 2014 review of ED functioning identified deficiencies in triage processes. Placement of Australian volunteer advisors provided an opportunity to develop and implement a purpose-designed triage system. METHODS: Action research methodology and the 'plan, act, observe, reflect' cycle was employed, leading to the development of a three-tier triage system based on the South African Triage Scale. ED patient flow and data management processes were simultaneously updated, and staff were trained in the new system. After a pilot period, the Solomon Islands Triage Scale was implemented in August 2017. Evaluation after 3 months of operation included predictive validity (using admission and case fatality rates as surrogate markers of urgency) and reliability (based on inter-rater agreement at retrospective chart review by an independent nurse). RESULTS: In the period 1 August to 31 October, there were 10 905 presentations, of which 97.1% were allocated a triage category (1% category 1, 21.3% category 2 and the remainder category 3). Admission rates correlated closely with triage category (P < 0.01). The case fatality rate was 22.1% for category 1 patients, 0.09% for category 2 and 0.01% for category 3 (P < 0.01). An audit of 96 records conducted in October 2017 revealed 88.4% agreement for triage category allocation. CONCLUSION: Solomon Islands Triage Scale is the first three-tier triage scale to be implemented in the Pacific region and appears to have adequate validity and reliability. The partnership between Australian volunteers and local clinicians is a positive example of capacity development and represents a model that could be implemented in other resource-limited settings.