Synchronizing positive effect of vitamin C and chromium on hyper lipidemia, hyperglycemia, liver enzymes and BMI of diabetes mellitus type 2 patients.

This study investigates the combined effect of vitamin C and chromium on BMI, lipid profile, LFTs and HbA1c of Diabetes Mellitus type 2 patients. This is randomized controlled trial study. For this study a total of 60 patients (n=28 female, n=32 male) Diabetes Mellitus type 2 patients were selected. They were divided into treatment group (vitamin C (500mg) Chromium (200µg) and control group (placebo) comprising thirty patients per group. Mean age in control group and treatment group is 33± 5.729 and 33±7.017 respectively. Statistical analysis showed significant results of lipid profile; total cholesterol (mg/dl) 198±66.1 P=0.008, High-Density Lipoprotein 38±7.5, P<0.001, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) (mg/dl) 105.1±22.4, P=0.002 and Triglycerides 191±64.3, P=0.02 are respectively. Levels of serum ALT (u/l) (34.7±9.1, P<0.001) and AST (u/l) (31.6 ±8.6, P<0.001) were significantly lower as compared to control group. HbA1c percentages were also normalized (5.45±0.2, P<.001) as compared to group 2. BMI values were also improved (P=0.01) after treatment. Combined supplementation of vitamin C and chromium reduce the plasma lipid percentage, blood glucose levels and also improve the ALT and AST functions.

FDA Approved Biologics: Can Etanercept and Ustekinumab be Considered a First-Line Systemic Therapy for Pediatric/Adolescents in Moderate to Severe Psoriasis? A Systematic Review.

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated skin disorder. Due to lack of clarity in its pathogenesis, a cure with existing treatment is a big challenge. Biologics, a revolutionary treatment, are potent immunomodulators that explicitly target the culprit cells of the immune system to achieve the maximum level of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score (75 to 90) and clear or almost clear skin in moderate to severe psoriasis. They have been a successful therapy in adult severe psoriasis for a decade. In recent years, biologics have unprecedently sought the attention of the pediatric psoriatic population by proving an efficacious and safe option. The aim of the study is to provide a systematic review of efficacy, safety, and impact on the quality of life of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved biologics, namely etanercept and ustekinumab, and their use as a "first-line systemic therapy" in the moderate to severe pediatric and adolescent psoriatic population. We explored PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, American Academy of Dermatology website, ClinicalTrials.gov, the FDA site, and the National Psoriasis Foundation USA site as major database searches. Psoriasis, pediatric, etanercept, and ustekinumab were keywords used to find the relevant literature. Clinical trials and observational studies were retrieved and analyzed to assess the efficacy and safety of FDA-approved biologics as first-line systemic therapy in pediatric psoriasis. The relevant evidence-based studies and the Joint American Academy of Dermatology-National Psoriasis Foundation (AAD-NPF) guideline have shown that etanercept and ustekinumab biologics are significantly effective and safe systemic therapies in dealing with moderate to severe psoriasis in pediatric and adolescent patients and have unprecedently improved their quality of life. Thus, they can be confidently considered as first-line systemic therapy in moderate to severe pediatric and adolescent psoriatic patients by applying the specific criteria and proper monitoring. However, health practitioners and dermatologists must educate pediatric patients and their caretakers about their adverse effects, success/failure chance, careful monitoring, and follow-up plan to achieve the desired result.

Surgical Margin of Excision in Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of Literature.

Skin cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world and consists of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are the most common non-melanoma skin cancers. The ideal surgical treatment for BCC is complete removal, and it can be achieved either with safety margins or with micrographic control. The currently accepted treatment for basal cell carcinoma is an elliptical excision with a 4-mm surgical margin of clinically normal skin. However, because of cosmetic and functional constraints on the face, a 4-mm surgical margin is often not feasible. We used PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), and Google scholar as our main databases to search for the relevant published studies and used "Basal cell carcinoma" and "narrow excision margins" as Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) keywords. Fifteen studies were finalized for the review, which included 3843 lesions. The size of the lesions ranged from 3 to 30 mm, with a mean size of 11.7 mm. Surgical margins varied from 1 to 5 mm. This review was done to evaluate if small, well-defined primary BCCs can be excised using narrow surgical margins. Based on the reviewed literature, we found that for primary well-demarcated BCCs smaller than 2 cm, in the low-risk group, a safety margin of 3 mm gives satisfactory results. In the high-risk group, and for lesions larger than 2 cm, a 4-6 mm margin is suggested for getting clear margins. Mohs micrographic surgery is advocated for more complex and recurrent lesions where the clinical margin is not apparent. However, micrographic surgery is not readily available in many places and requires more training and experience. Therefore, excision with 2 mm margins for clinically well-defined lesions with close follow-up can be followed to preserve the healthy tissue in anatomic constraint lesions and avoid the need for complex reconstructive procedures.

Neurological and Psychological Effects of Coronavirus (COVID-19): An Overview of the Current Era Pandemic.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19) is a catastrophic illness that has significantly altered the world's panoramic view of medicine. As the number of cases around the globe rise, the COVID-19 research writing has been immediately enhanced by professionals internationally. In this review, we focus on the neurological and psychological effects of COVID-19, which can determine both the severity of coronavirus and its related pandemic respectively. While it is critical to distinguish the neurological manifestations from the psychological effects, the latter is becoming more pervasive due to the fast-expanding outbreak. We conducted a systematic review and included observational retrospective, case-series studies, and surveys to establish the largest pool of valuable research. Articles on these approaches were conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google scholar. Some gray material was also selected because of the recent nature of the disease. Data collected from the studies have proposed that COVID-19 is not unusual in demonstrating the neurological symptoms, as it proved in the past by its sister coronaviruses such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-1 (SARS-COV-1) and Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-COV). Studies have presented that some patients with COVID-19 also showed neurological signs, such as headache, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, loss of taste and smell, and impaired consciousness. However, it necessary to clarify that the invasion of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-COV-2) directly or indirectly affects the central nervous system (CNS). Contrarily, the COVID-19 pandemic has affected every single element of life. It has not only changed the individual's health directly but also has significant psychological, economic, and sociological effects. These issues indicate the disease's extraordinary threat, and we must realize that another pandemic will shortly follow it: that of mental and behavioral illness. Thus, the long-lasting psychological implications of this outbreak deserve further investigation side by side.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Children: Vulnerable or Spared? A Systematic Review.

The ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected people from all cultures, religions, gender, and age groups around the world. In the last few months, several studies have been conducted on various aspects of COVID-19. Our goal was to see if the pediatric population is vulnerable to this infection. In this review, we conducted extensive research mainly by using the PubMed database. We used Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and associated keywords to engage in an extensive search focussing on COVID-19 in the pediatric population. We discovered that most of the studies were from China, and some of them were in the Chinese language. However, English translations of many of the studies were available. For accessing the relevant statistical data, we relied on the World Health Organization (WHO) resources and the official website of the Ontario Government (ontario.ca). Most of the studies showed that the virus has affected the pediatric population. However, we found some differences among these studies regarding the severity of symptoms in children affected by COVID-19. While a few studies stated that the virus has presented with milder symptoms in the pediatric population, some studies have presented data of children who have suffered life-threatening complications due to COVID-19. Although the data is limited, we have been able to conclude from the studies we reviewed that COVID-19 does indeed affect children the same way as any other age group. Moreover, children can act as carriers of the virus and can endanger the lives of other individuals. Besides, neonates and infants can easily acquire the infection from family members without having any exposure to the outside world. Hence, utmost care should be taken while handling this population. More trials and studies should be conducted to analyze the impact of early diagnosis of infection in children and its management.