Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Int Ophthalmol ; 42(6): 1861-1866, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35094224

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:  To report the outcomes of phacoemulsification with piggyback intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, with double-in-bag IOLs in the management of angle-closure glaucoma (ACG) in nanophthalmic eyes. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series on nanophthalmic eyes with variable presentations of ACG. Phacoemulsification with double-in-bag IOL implantation was done for the included eyes. Baseline and follow-up corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), intraocular pressure (IOP), and the number of glaucoma medications were evaluated. Surgical details were extracted, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Six eyes of three patients were included. The mean axial length was 17.24 ± 1.02 mm. The mean preoperative IOP was 20 ± 2.7 mmHg with medical treatment. The mean preoperative CDVA (logMar) was 0.83 ± 0.37 with mean SE 12.7 ± 1.77 diopters. The mean postoperative IOP at 3-month and 1-year follow-ups was 14 ± 5.3 mmHg and 15.5 ± 4.1 mmHg, respectively. Postoperative CDVA was 0.78 ± 0.41, with mean SE -0.04 ± 2 diopters. No significant intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported. One eye developed posterior capsule opacification (PCO), and another eye developed visually insignificant inter-lenticular opacification (ILO). CONCLUSIONS: In the evaluated nanophthalmic eyes with ACG, lens extraction with double-in-bag IOL implantation showed promising results regarding the IOP control as well as the visual and refractive outcomes.


Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction , Glaucoma, Angle-Closure , Lenses, Intraocular , Phacoemulsification , Glaucoma, Angle-Closure/surgery , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/methods , Phacoemulsification/methods , Retrospective Studies
2.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; 32(3): 1398-1405, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34180262

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To explore the possible challenges and difficulties of using Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in ophthalmic practice during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: This is a multicenter, international survey among practicing ophthalmologists across different countries. The survey was conducted from September 9th to October 24th, 2020. It included a total of 23 questions that navigated through the currently adopted recommendations in different clinical situations. The survey also assessed the convenience of using various PPE in ophthalmic practice and addressed the clarity of the examination field while using various PPE during clinical or surgical procedures. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-two ophthalmologists completed the survey (101 from Egypt, 50 from the USA, and 21 from four other countries). The analysis of the responses showed that most ophthalmologists use face masks without significant problems during their examinations, while face shields followed by protective goggles were the most inconvenient PPE in the current ophthalmic practice. Moreover, most of the participants (133, 77.3%) noticed an increase in their examination time when using PPE. Furthermore, a considerable percentage of the respondents (70, 40.7%) stopped using one or more of the PPE due to inconvenience or discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the unique nature of the ophthalmic examination, certain PPE are not ophthalmologist-friendly. Innovative PPE should be tailored for prompt, more convenient, and clearer ophthalmological practice.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ophthalmologists , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Int J Retina Vitreous ; 7(1): 61, 2021 Oct 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34656175

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To evaluate choroidal thickness (CT) in diabetic patients without diabetic retinopathy (DR) in relation to the urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER). METHODS: This is a prospective case-control study that included a consecutive sample of 120 patients with type 2 diabetes without clinically evident DR and a group of 60 matched healthy controls. Diabetic patients were included in two groups according to their UAER (normoalbuminuria and microalbuminuria). Complete ophthalmological examination was performed followed by optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) for retinal and choroidal assessment. Twenty-four-hour urine samples were collected for UAER and blood samples for HbA1c and serum creatinine were obtained. RESULTS: The study included 180 eyes from 180 subjects in three groups. Patients with higher levels of albuminuria had a thinner choroid than normal controls, with decremental thinning as albuminuria progressed. Diabetics with normoalbuminuria showed no significant differences from controls. Choroidal thickness showed a significant moderate negative correlation with UAER (r = - 0.58, p < 0.001). Multiple regression analyses for diabetic patients with microalbuminuria demonstrated that UAER is the most important determinant of subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Decreased CT was significantly correlated with UAER in diabetic patients without retinopathy and otherwise normal kidney functions. This decrease in thickness might be a predictor of DR.

4.
J Neuroradiol ; 48(5): 319-324, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34087330

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The incidence of devastating opportunistic coinfections in patients with COVID-19 infection, their imaging features and their morbidity and mortality consequences need to be unraveled. METHODS: This is a case series presenting the radiologic features and clinical presentation of acute invasive fungal rhino-orbital-cerebral sinusitis (AIFS) in eight hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection. RESULTS: Our patient cohort presented with symptoms of the invasive fungal disease within 12-35 days from their initial presentation with COVID-19 infection. The cross-sectional imaging features of AIFS associated with COVID-19 infection do not differ from those reported in the literature for AIFS associated with other risk factors, yet our patients had features of aggressive late-stage forms with high morbidity and mortality rate. CONCLUSION: AIFS is a possible encounter in patients with COVID-19 patients and radiologists should be familiar with its imaging features.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mucormycosis , Sinusitis , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Sinusitis/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
5.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 8: 645270, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34124087

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine if there was an increase in the rate of cases presenting with rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis (ROCM) to a tertiary care center during the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the characteristics of the presenting cases. Methods: Retrospective observational study reviewing ROCM cases presenting from March 25 until September 25, 2020. Cases fulfilling the clinical, radiological, and pathological/microbiological criteria for diagnosis with ROCM were included. The number of cases presenting during the designated interval, their COVID-19 status, comorbidities, and clinical presentation were analyzed. The number of cases during the corresponding interval in the previous 3 years was used as reference to detect if there was a recent spike. Results: Of the 12 ROCM cases identified, 5 had a concurrent positive reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) test result for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), 1 had a prior positive result, and 6 did not have concurrent nor prior positive test results. Nine of the 12 cases had poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, and 2 cases had a hematological malignancy. All cases had orbital invasion, and eight cases had cerebral invasion. The number of cases identified during the interval is much higher than the numbers presenting in the prior 3 years during equivalent intervals (range, one to two cases) than those reported in the literature in different settings in the pre-pandemic era. Conclusions: There is an increased rate of ROCM cases presenting to our center during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. This is a preliminary report, and further studies are needed to corroborate the findings and explain possible underlying links.

6.
Int Ophthalmol ; 41(5): 1681-1687, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33528823

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report visual impairment and blindness among the patients attending a glaucoma clinic in a tertiary university hospital and highlight the possible risk factors that could be addressed later. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the medical records of the patients attending the glaucoma clinic in Ain Shams University Hospitals over a period of one year was conducted. Visual impairment classification was done according to the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11) based on the best-corrected visual acuity in the better-seeing eye. Data including diagnosis, history of previous surgery, and duration of glaucoma were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: The medical records of the first visit of 118 patients (58 males and 60 females) were included in this study. Secondary glaucoma was the most common type presented (38 patients, 32.2%), followed by primary open-angle glaucoma (35 patients, 29.6%). Sixty-seven patients (56.7%) were considered visually impaired, while seven patients (5.9%) were considered blind. Forty-one patients (34.7%) were considered mono-ocular blind. CONCLUSION: There is a high incidence of visual impairment and blindness among glaucoma patients presented to the glaucoma clinic in the  tertiary hospital. A further nation-wide study and possibly, an early surveillance program for glaucoma are needed.


Subject(s)
Glaucoma, Open-Angle , Glaucoma , Blindness/epidemiology , Blindness/etiology , Female , Glaucoma/complications , Glaucoma/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Visual Acuity
7.
Cornea ; 39(11): 1394-1400, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32833848

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To provide a normative database of several Pentacam parameters for a healthy pediatric population. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at Al Watany Eye Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt. We explored the Pentacam HR database and collected the data of 432 normal right eyes of children and teenagers aged 3 to 18 years. The subjects were classified into the following 3 groups: group 1 (3-6 years, 17 eyes), group 2 (6-12 years, 126 eyes), and group 3 (12-18 years, 289 eyes). The parameters of the study cohort were compared with those of a healthy adult cohort. RESULTS: The mean age of the study cohort was 13.5 (13.2-13.8) years. There were significant differences in the following indices among the 3 age groups: anterior chamber (depth and volume), curvature (index of height decentration, index of vertical asymmetry, and center keratoconus index), elevation (front and back elevations from the best fit toric ellipsoid), and pachymetric (minimum and average pachymetric progression indices and average Ambrosio relational thickness) parameters (P values 0.001, 0.001, 0.002, 0.04, <0.001, <0.001, 0.03, 0.02, 0.01, and 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences in the normative values of several Pentacam indices between the pediatric and adult cohorts. Based on this finding, it is more credible to incorporate separate software cutoff values for pediatric patients. However, because there were no clinically significant differences in the parameters of the pediatric subgroups, there is no need to consider a separate cutoff value for each pediatric age range.


Subject(s)
Cornea/diagnostic imaging , Corneal Pachymetry/methods , Corneal Topography/methods , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , ROC Curve , Reference Values , Retrospective Studies
8.
Int Ophthalmol ; 40(7): 1759-1764, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32221762

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the agreement between Orbscan 3, Pentacam HR and ultrasound pachymetry (Palm Scan AP 2000) in measuring central corneal thickness. METHODS: Prospective observational cross-sectional study of ninety-two eyes of 48 patients with normal corneas was conducted. Central corneal thickness was measured via Pentacam HR, Orbscan 3 and ultrasound pachymetry. Bland-Altman analysis was used to demonstrate agreement between various methods. RESULTS: Ninety-two eyes of 46 subjects were enrolled. The mean age was 29.67 years (18-59). The average measurements of central corneal thickness were 545.73 ± 29.35 µm, 549.34 ± 29.14 µm and 545.78 ± 31.48 µm for the Pentacam HR, Orbscan and ultrasound pachymetry, respectively. The three devices measurements are closely correlated, with Pearson correlation coefficient ranging from 0.868 to 0.929. The 95 % limits of agreement were 25.2 to - 18 µm between Orbscan and Pentacam central corneal thickness, 25.2 to - 25.7 µm between Pentacam and pachymetry central corneal thickness and 34.4 to - 27.2 µm between Orbscan and pachymetry central corneal thickness. CONCLUSION: In spite of advancement of Orbscan 3, still there are wide agreement limits between CCT measurements obtained via Orbscan 3, Pentacam HR and ultrasound pachymetry; thus, interchangeable use in clinical practice is not recommended.


Subject(s)
Cornea , Corneal Topography , Adult , Cornea/diagnostic imaging , Corneal Pachymetry , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...