Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
ESC Heart Fail ; 10(3): 2042-2050, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37051755

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is an under-diagnosed cause of heart failure (HF) and has a worse prognosis than other forms of HF. The frequency of death or rehospitalization following discharge for acute heart failure (AHF) in CA (relative to other causes) has not been documented. The study aims to compare hospital readmission and death rates 90 days after discharge for AHF in patients with vs. without CA and to identify risk factors associated with these events in each group. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with HF and CA (HF + CA+) were recruited from the ICREX cohort, after screening of their medical records. The cases were matched 1:5 by sex and age with control HF patients without CA (HF + CA-). There were 27 HF + CA + and 135 HF + CA- patients from the ICREX cohort included in the study. Relative to the HF + CA- group, HF + CA+ patients had a higher heart rate (P = 0.002) and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide levels (P < 0.001) and lower blood pressure (P < 0.001), weight, and body mass index values (P < 0.001) on discharge. Ninety days after discharge, the HF + CA+ group displayed a higher death rate, a higher all-cause hospital readmission rate, and a higher hospital readmission rate for AHF. Death and hospital readmissions occurred sooner after discharge in the HF + CA+ group than in the HF + CA- group. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of CA in patients with HF was associated with a three-fold greater risk of death and a two-fold greater risk of all-cause hospital readmission 90 days after discharge. These findings emphasize the importance of close, active management of patients with CA and AHF.


Subject(s)
Amyloidosis , Heart Failure , Humans , Patient Readmission , Heart Failure/complications , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/therapy , Prognosis , Patient Discharge , Amyloidosis/complications , Amyloidosis/epidemiology
2.
BMC Geriatr ; 21(1): 288, 2021 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33933023

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: A growing number of elderly patients hospitalized for Acute Heart Failure (AHF) are being managed in cardiogeriatrics departments, but their characteristics and prognosis are poorly known. This study aimed to investigate the profile and outcome (rehospitalization at 90 days) of patients hospitalized for AHF in cardiogeriatrics departments in the Val-de-Marne area in the suburbs of Paris, and to compare them to AHF patients hospitalized in cardiology departments in the same area. METHODS: Observational study, ICREX-94, conducted in seven cardiology departments in France and three specific cardiogeriatrics departments in Val-de-Marne. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients were hospitalized for AHF between October 2017 and January 2019. During the 90 days following discharge, 29.6% patients were readmitted to the hospital. Compared with patients hospitalized in cardiology departments, patients in cardiogeriatrics departments were older (p < 0.001), less independent (living more often alone or in an institution) (p < 0.001), more often depressed (p < 0.001), had more often major neurocognitive disorder (p < 0.001), had a higher Human Development Index (HDI, p < 0.001), and were less often diagnosed with amyloidosis (p < 0.001). There was no difference in outcome whether patients were discharged from cardiology or cardiogeriatrics departments. The most frequent precipitating factors underlying AHF decompensation between the first and second hospitalization were arrhythmia and infection. CONCLUSION: AHF patients discharged from cardiogeriatrics departments, compared to cardiology departments, showed clinical differences but had the same prognosis regarding AHF rehospitalization at 90 days.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Acute Disease , Aged , France/epidemiology , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/therapy , Hospitalization , Humans , Patient Discharge , Prognosis
3.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 84(5): 766-71, 2014 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23982995

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To compare the efficacy of three vasodilators in preventing radial artery spasm (RAS) in patients undergoing transradial percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: 731 patients were randomized to receive diltiazem 5 mg, verapamil 2.5 mg, or isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) 1 mg before coronary intervention. RAS occurred in 20.1% in the whole population and was significantly reduced by verapamil and ISDN compared to diltiazem (16.2, 17.2, and 26.6%, respectively; P < 0.006). There was also a trend towards less severe pain (more than 8 on a numerical scale from 0 [no pain] to 10 [maximal pain]), and less severe RAS (complete catheter blockage or severe pain), among patients treated by verapamil compared to ISDN and diltiazem (1.3% vs. 2.8% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.43 and 5.1% vs. 6.2% vs. 9.5%, respectively, P = 0.13). No difference was found between the three vasodilators in terms of crossover or safety events. Female gender, failure at first attempt to access the radial artery, emergency procedures, and the use of diltiazem were independent predictors of RAS. CONCLUSION: Verapamil and ISDN considerably reduce the incidence of RAS compared to diltiazem during transradial PCI.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods , Diltiazem/administration & dosage , Isosorbide Dinitrate/administration & dosage , Radial Artery/drug effects , Spasm/prevention & control , Verapamil/administration & dosage , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Stenosis/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Vasoconstriction/drug effects , Vasodilator Agents/administration & dosage
4.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 5(1): 69-76, S1, 2012 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22319064

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The value of prehospital initiation of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors remains a controversial issue. We sought to investigate whether in-ambulance initiation of abciximab in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) improves ST-segment elevation resolution (STR) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: MISTRAL (Myocardial Infarction with ST-elevation Treated by Primary Percutaneous Intervention Facilitated by Early Reopro Administration in Alsace) is a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Two hundred and fifty-six patients with acute STEMI were allocated to receive abciximab either in the ambulance (ambulance group, n=127) or in the catheterization laboratory (hospital group, n=129). The primary end point was complete (>70%) STR after PCI. Complete STR was not significantly different between the 2 groups (before PCI, 21.6% versus 15.5%, P=0.28; after PCI, 70.3% versus 65.8%, P=0.49). Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 2 to 3 flow rates before PCI tended to be higher in the ambulance group (46.8% versus 35%, P=0.08) but not after PCI (70.3% versus 65.8%, P=0.49). Slow flow tended to be lower (5.6% versus 13.4%, P=0.07), and distal embolization occurred significantly less often in the ambulance group (8.1% versus 21.1%, P=0.008). One- and 6-month major adverse cardiac event rates were low and similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early ambulance administration of abciximab in STEMI did not improve either STR or TIMI flow rate after PCI. However, it tended to improve TIMI flow pre-PCI and decreased distal embolization during procedure. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Emergency Medical Services , Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments/administration & dosage , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Abciximab , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Electrocardiography , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex/antagonists & inhibitors , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
5.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 102(11): 749-54, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19944390

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Operator radiation exposure is high during coronary procedures. The radial access decreases the rate of local vascular complications but increases operator radiation exposure. As the X-ray exposure is related to the distance between the operator and the radiation source, the use of an extension tube between the proximal part of the coronary catheter and the 'injection device' might decrease operator radiation exposure. AIMS: To demonstrate that the use of an extension tube during coronary procedures performed through the radial approach decreases operator radiation. METHODS: Overall, 230 patients were included consecutively and randomized to procedures performed with or without an extension tube. Radiation exposure measures were obtained using two electronic dosimeters, one under the lead apron and the other exposed on the physician's left arm. RESULTS: A non-significant trend towards lower left-arm operator exposure was noted in the extension tube group (28.7+/-31.0microSv vs 38.4+/-44.2microSv, p=0.0739). No significant difference was noted according to the type of procedure. Radiation levels were low compared with the series published previously and decreased for each operator during the study. CONCLUSION: The use of an extension tube did not reduce operator radiation exposure during procedures performed through the radial approach. However, physician awareness was increased during the study due to the use of an exposed electronic dosimeter. The use of exposed electronic dosimeters could therefore be recommended to allow operators to improve their protection techniques.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/instrumentation , Coronary Angiography/instrumentation , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure , Occupational Health , Radial Artery/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Protection , Radiography, Interventional/instrumentation , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects , Attitude of Health Personnel , Awareness , Coronary Angiography/adverse effects , Equipment Design , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Prospective Studies , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Monitoring , Radiography, Interventional/adverse effects , Time Factors
6.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 68(2): 231-5, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16819768

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Radial artery spasm remains the major limitation of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of vasodilators in the prevention of radial artery spasm during percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS AND RESULTS: 1,219 patients were consecutively randomized to receive placebo (n = 198), molsidomine 1 mg (n = 203), verapamil 2.5 mg (n = 409), 5 mg (n = 203) or verapamil 2.5 mg and molsidomine 1 mg (n = 206). All drugs were administered through the arterial sheath. The primary end point was the occurrence of a radial artery spasm defined by the operator as severe limitation of the catheter movement, with or without angiographic confirmation. Main characteristics including age, sex, wrist and arterial sheath diameters and procedure duration were identical across the groups. The rate of radial artery spasm was lowest in patients receiving verapamil and molsidomine (4.9%), compared to verapamil 2.5 mg or 5 mg (8.3 and 7.9%), or molsidomine 1 mg (13.3%); and placebo (22.2%) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Radial artery spasm during transradial percutaneous interventions was effectively prevented by the administration of vasodilators. The combination of verapamil 2.5 mg and molsidomine 1 mg provided the strongest relative risk reduction of spasm compared to placebo and should therefore be recommended during percutaneous coronary interventions through the radial approach.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Coronary Vasospasm/prevention & control , Molsidomine/therapeutic use , Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Verapamil/therapeutic use , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects , Coronary Vasospasm/etiology , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radial Artery
8.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 15(7): 390-2, 2003 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12840236

ABSTRACT

Coronary subclavian steal syndrome arises when a stenosis of the subclavian artery results in reduced antegrade or retrograde flow in an internal mammary artery with resultant coronary ischemia. This occurs in patients who have previously undergone surgical coronary revascularization utilizing an internal mammary artery graft. This syndrome can be successfully treated percutaneously with excellent immediate and long-term results.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon/methods , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/therapy , Internal Mammary-Coronary Artery Anastomosis/adverse effects , Mammary Arteries , Myocardial Ischemia/etiology , Myocardial Ischemia/therapy , Subclavian Artery , Aged , Angiography , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/complications , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...