Subject(s)
Female , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Occupational Medicine , Physicians, Women , United StatesABSTRACT
In order to identify functional status measures for epidemiological studies among workers with mild to moderate disorders of the neck and upper extremity, a literature search was conducted for the years 1966 to 2001. Inclusion criteria were: (1) relevance to neck and upper extremity; (2) assessment among workers; and (3) relevance to mild to moderate disorders. Of 13 instruments reviewed, six measures were tested among workers. The three best measures, depending on the purpose of research, included the standardised Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire, the Upper Extremity Questionnaire, and the Neck and Upper Limb Instrument. Development of a functional protocol is regarded as a realistic enhancement for research of neck and upper extremity disorders in the workplace. For research and clinical practice, measures of functional status, sensitive enough to measure the subtle conditions in mild to moderate disorders, may provide prognostic information about the risk of developing musculoskeletal disorders in apparently healthy patients. Appropriate use of functional status questionnaires is imperative for a meaningful portrayal of health.
Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Health Status Indicators , Musculoskeletal Diseases/diagnosis , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Humans , Neck/physiopathology , Reproducibility of Results , Upper Extremity/physiopathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Questionnaires are often used in research among workers although few have been tested in the working population. The Upper Extremity Questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire designed for epidemiological studies and tested among workers. This study assessed reliability of the instrument. METHODS: A two-part assessment was conducted among 138 keyboard operators as part of a large medical survey. Test-retest reliability was analyzed using the kappa statistic, paired t-test, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Logistic regression models were used to test the effect of demographic and work-related factors on reliability. RESULTS: The average respondent was a white woman, age 35 years, with some college education, in permanent employment with tenure of 1.4 years. Overall, reports of symptoms were stable from Round 1 to 2. Most kappa values for symptom reports were between 0.60 and 0.89. Kappa values for right and left hand diagrams were 0.57 and 0.28, respectively. Among psychosocial items, Perceived Stress and Job Dissatisfaction Scales were most reliable (ICC = 0.88); co-worker support was least reliable (ICC = 0.44). CONCLUSION: Reliability of items on the Upper Extremity Questionnaire were generally good to excellent. Reports of symptom severity and interference with work were less stable. Demographic and work-related factors were not statistically significant in modeling the variation in reliability. Repeated use of the questionnaire with similar results suggests findings are applicable to a larger working population.
Subject(s)
Computers , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Age Distribution , Arm , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/etiology , Data Collection , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , Sex DistributionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Physical examination is a traditional outcome measure in epidemiological research. Its value as a reliable measure depends, in part, on the prevalence of positive findings. The purpose of this paper is to determine the empirical reliability of physical examination and anthropometry in a field study of upper extremity disorders among keyboard operators. METHODS: Two experienced examiners independently performed common provocative tests and procedures in physical examinations of the neck and upper extremity among 160 keyboard operators. Two additional examiners conducted anthropometric surveys among 137 workers. Inter-examiner reliability was assessed with observed agreement, kappa statistics, and intra-class correlations (ICC). RESULTS: Observed agreement was between 96% and 100% for neck and upper extremity signs, muscle stretch reflexes, and muscle strength, however, with the exception of provocative tests, reliability statistics were unstable. Among the provocative tests, Phalen and Tinel tests had modest agreement after adjusting for chance (kappa range: 0.20-0.43). The carpal compression test had the best reliability (kappa=0.60 and kappa=0.67, left and right side, respectively). The ICCs for anthropometry ranged from 0.36-0.91. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the study showed that statistically, except for the carpal compression test, physical examination contributed minimal reliable information. This was attributed mainly to the low prevalence of positive findings, and generally mild nature of upper extremity disorders in this population. The results are the best estimate of what would be found in a field study with experienced examiners. While it may reduce bias, separating physical examination from medical history may contribute to the poor reliability of findings. With a shift toward reliable measures, resources can be allocated to more effective tools, like questionnaires, in epidemiological research of upper extremity disorders among keyboard operators.
Subject(s)
Arm Injuries/diagnosis , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/diagnosis , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Physical Examination , Adult , Anthropometry , Bias , Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/diagnosis , Computer Systems , Epidemiologic Research Design , Female , Humans , Male , Medical History Taking , Middle Aged , Muscle Contraction/physiology , Neck Injuries/diagnosis , Observer Variation , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Physical Examination/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Reflex, Stretch/physiology , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Nerve conduction studies play an important role in clinical practice and research. Given their widespread use, reliability of tests merits careful attention. We assessed interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability of median and ulnar sensory nerve measures of amplitude, onset latency, and peak latency. In a two-phase cross-sectional study, two examiners tested 158 workers. Reliability was assessed with intraclass correlations (ICC) and kappa statistics. Median nerve measures were more reliable (ICC range, 0.76 to 0.92) than ulnar measures (ICC range, 0.22 to 0.85). Ulnar-onset latencies had the worst reliability. The median-ulnar peak latency difference was a particularly stable measure (ICC range, 0.79 to 0.92). The median-ulnar peak latency difference had high interexaminer reliability (kappa range, 0.71 to 0.79) for normal tests defined by cut points of 0.8 ms and 0.5 ms. Intraexaminer reliability was higher with the 0.8-ms cut point (kappa = 0.90 and kappa = 0.85 for examiners 1 and 2, respectively). Rather than absolute cut points to describe normality, a more rational interpretation of results can be made with ordered categories or continuous measures.
Subject(s)
Computer Peripherals , Neural Conduction/physiology , Occupational Health , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Median Nerve/physiology , Middle Aged , Neurons, Afferent/physiology , Observer Variation , Reaction Time , Reference Values , Ulnar Nerve/physiologyABSTRACT
To determine normative values for nerve conduction studies among workers, we selected a subset of 326 workers from 955 subjects who participated in medical surveys in the workplace. The reference cohort was composed exclusively of active workers, in contrast to the typical convenience samples. Nerve conduction measures included bilateral median and ulnar sensory amplitude and latency (onset and peak). Workers with upper extremity symptoms, medical conditions that could adversely affect peripheral nerve function, low hand temperature, or highly repetitive jobs were excluded from the "normal" cohort. Linear regression models explained between 21% and 51% of the variance in nerve function, with covariates of age, sex, hand temperature, and anthropometric factors. The most robust models were fitted for sensory amplitudes in the median and ulnar nerves for dominant and nondominant hands. The median-ulnar difference was least sensitive to adjustment, indicating it is the best measure to use if corrections are not made to account for relevant covariates. A key point was that the magnitude of variance increased with age and anthropometric factors. These findings provide strong evidence that to improve diagnostic accuracy, electrodiagnostic testing should control for relevant covariates, particularly age, sex, hand temperature, and anthropometric factors.
Subject(s)
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/diagnosis , Electrodiagnosis/standards , Median Nerve/physiology , Neural Conduction/physiology , Ulnar Nerve/physiology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Anthropometry , Body Temperature , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Reference Values , Sex FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Efforts to understand or to monitor upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders among workers have usually involved the use of questionnaires. The goal of this study was to assess the test-retest reliability of an upper-extremity discomfort questionnaire among industrial workers. METHODS: Test-retest agreement among 148 workers was analyzed using the kappa coefficient for categorical outcomes. Values of kappa greater than 0.75 are considered excellent, values between 0.40 and 0.75 are fair to good, and values of less than 0.40 represent poor agreement beyond chance alone. Test-retest results of continuous measures (eg, visual analogue scale responses) were compared with paired t-tests. RESULTS: The test-retest reliability of the questionnaire used to elicit demographic information, medical history, exercise participation, and information on musculoskeletal symptoms among industrial workers appears to be good to excellent in most instances. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that most results of this discomfort questionnaire are reliable and suitable for use in epidemiologic studies. For reassurance of the robustness of these findings, similar studies should be carried out in other worker populations with this, and other, questionnaire instruments.
