Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(1): 38, 2023 Dec 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38110572

ABSTRACT

AIM: Radiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM) is the most frequent side effect in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with curative radiotherapy (RT). A standardized strategy for preventing and treating RIOM has not been defined. Aim of this study was to perform a real-life survey on RIOM management among Italian RT centers. METHODS: A 40-question survey was administered to 25 radiation oncologists working in 25 different RT centers across Italy. RESULTS: A total of 1554 HNC patients have been treated in the participating centers in 2021, the majority (median across the centers 91%) with curative intent. Median treatment time was 41 days, with a mean percentage of interruption due to toxicity of 14.5%. Eighty percent of responders provide written oral cavity hygiene recommendations. Regarding RIOM prevention, sodium bicarbonate mouthwashes, oral mucosa barrier agents, and hyaluronic acid-based mouthwashes were the most frequent topic agents used. Regarding RIOM treatment, 14 (56%) centers relied on literature evidence, while internal guidelines were available in 13 centers (44%). Grade (G)1 mucositis is mostly treated with sodium bicarbonate mouthwashes, oral mucosa barrier agents, and steroids, while hyaluronic acid-based agents, local anesthetics, and benzydamine were the most used in mucositis G2/G3. Steroids, painkillers, and anti-inflammatory drugs were the most frequent systemic agents used independently from the RIOM severity. CONCLUSION: Great variety of strategies exist among Italian centers in RIOM management for HNC patients. Whether different strategies could impact patients' compliance and overall treatment time of the radiation course is still unclear and needs further investigation.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Mucositis , Radiation Injuries , Radiation Oncology , Stomatitis , Humans , Mucositis/drug therapy , Mouthwashes/therapeutic use , Sodium Bicarbonate/therapeutic use , Hyaluronic Acid/therapeutic use , Stomatitis/etiology , Stomatitis/prevention & control , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Steroids
2.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(2)2022 Jan 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35053456

ABSTRACT

In breast cancer, the use of a boost to the tumor bed can improve local control. The aim of this research is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the boost with intra-operative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) in patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing conservative surgery and postoperative whole breast irradiation (WBI). The present retrospective multicenter large data were collected between January 2011 and March 2018 in 8 Italian Radiation Oncology Departments. Acute and late toxicity, objective (obj) and subjective (subj) cosmetic outcomes, in-field local control (LC), out-field LC, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Overall, 797 patients were enrolled. IOERT-boost was performed in all patients during surgery, followed by WBI. Acute toxicity (≥G2) occurred in 179 patients (22.46%); one patient developed surgical wound infection (G3). No patients reported late toxicity ≥ G2. Obj-cosmetic result was excellent in 45%, good in 35%, fair in 20% and poor in 0% of cases. Subj-cosmetic result was excellent in 10%, good in 20%, fair in 69% and poor in 0.3% of cases. Median follow-up was 57 months (range 12-109 months). At 5 years, in-field LC was 99.2% (95% CI: 98-99.7); out-field LC 98.9% (95% CI: 97.4-99.6); DFS 96.2% (95% CI: 94.2-97.6); OS 98.6% (95% CI: 97.2-99.3). In conclusion, IOERT-boost appears to be safe, providing excellent local control for early-stage breast cancer. The safety and long-term efficacy should encourage use of this treatment, with the potential to reduce local recurrence.

3.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 47(8): 2046-2052, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33757649

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The endpoint of the present study was to evaluate the outcomes of short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and SCRT with delayed surgery (SCRT-DS) on a selected subgroup of frail patients with locally advanced middle/low rectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2018, a total of 128 frail patients with locally advanced middle-low rectal adenocarcinoma underwent SCRT and subsequent restaging for eventual delayed surgery. Rates of complete pathological response, down-staging, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS: 128 patients completed 5 × 5 Gy pelvic radiotherapy. 69 of these were unfit for surgery; 59 underwent surgery 8 weeks (average time: 61 days) after radiotherapy. Downstaging of T occurred in 64% and down-staging of N in 50%. The median overall survival (OS) of SCRT alone was 19.5 months. The 1-year, 2-year, 3-year and 5-year OS was 48%, 22%, 14% and 0% respectively. In the surgical group, the median disease-free survival (DFS) and median OS were, respectively, 67 months (95% CI 49.8-83.1 months) and 72.1 months (95% CI 57.5-86.7 months). The 1, 2, 3, 5-year OS was 88%, 75%, 51%, 46%, respectively. Post-operative morbidity was 22%, mortality was 3.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Frail patients with advanced rectal cancer are often "unfit" for long-term neoadjuvant chemoradiation. A SCRT may be considered a valid option for this group of patients. Once radiotherapy is completed, patients can be re-evaluated for surgery. If feasible, SCRT and delayed surgery is the best option for frail patients.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Frailty/complications , Proctectomy/methods , Radiotherapy, Conformal/methods , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Abscess/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/complications , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/physiopathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cancer Pain/etiology , Cancer Pain/physiopathology , Colectomy , Digestive System Fistula/epidemiology , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Neoplasm Staging , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Rectal Neoplasms/complications , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Survival Rate
4.
Anim Reprod Sci ; 219: 106509, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32828395

ABSTRACT

The capacity for microscopic evaluation of sperm is useful for assisted reproductive technologies (ART), because this can allow for specific selection of sperm cells for in vitro fertilization (IVF). The objective of this study was to analyze the same sperm samples using two high-resolution methods: spatial light interference microscopy (SLIM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) to determine if with one method there was more timely and different information obtained than the other. To address this objective, there was evaluation of sperm populations from boars and stallions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported comparison when using AFM and high-sensitivity interferometric microscopy (such as SLIM) to evaluate spermatozoa. Results indicate that with the use of SLIM microscopy there is similar nanoscale sensitivity as with use of AFM while there is approximately 1,000 times greater throughput with use of SLIM. With SLIM, there is also allowace for the measurement of the dry mass (non-aqueous content) of spermatozoa, which may be a new label-free marker for sperm viability. In the second part of this study, there was analysis of two sperm populations. There were interesting correlations between the different compartments of the sperm and the dry mass in both boars and stallions. Furthermore, there was a correlation between the dry mass of the sperm head and the length and width of the acrosome in both boars and stallions. This correlation is positive in boars while it is negative in stallions.


Subject(s)
High-Throughput Screening Assays , Horses , Microscopy , Semen Analysis , Swine , Animals , Cell Shape , Fertilization in Vitro/veterinary , High-Throughput Screening Assays/methods , High-Throughput Screening Assays/veterinary , Male , Microscopy/methods , Microscopy/veterinary , Semen Analysis/methods , Semen Analysis/veterinary , Species Specificity , Sperm Head/ultrastructure , Spermatozoa/cytology , Spermatozoa/ultrastructure , Staining and Labeling/methods , Staining and Labeling/veterinary
5.
Oncology ; 96(1): 8-13, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30212829

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of the pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (N/L) on non-human papilloma virus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: N/L was calculated by dividing the neutrophil count by the lymphocyte count. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic impact of N/L and other clinical factors on survival outcomes. High/low N/L groups were defined as > 4.7 and ≤4.7, respectively. RESULTS: Data of 57 consecutive patients with non-HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer were analyzed. The 3-year disease-free survival was 79 versus 36.9% in favor of the low N/L group (p = 0.04). The 5-year overall survival was 71.6 versus 53.3% in the low N/L and high N/L group, respectively (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: N/L could play an important role in non-HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer progression and indicate prognosis.


Subject(s)
Leukocyte Count , Lymphocyte Count , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/blood , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/etiology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
6.
Ann Hematol ; 97(12): 2411-2416, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30094511

ABSTRACT

To report the clinical results after definitive radiotherapy (RT) for indolent primary cutaneous B cell lymphoma (pcBCL). The data concerning all patients treated for indolent pcBCL with RT with a curative intent between 1992 and 2012 were reviewed. All cases were (re)classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. A total of 42 patients with biopsy-proven primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma (pcFCL) and primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma (pcMZL) were included. The median follow-up is 9.5 years. Treatment with RT resulted in complete response (CR) in all patients. Eight patients showed one or multiple relapses confined to the skin. No in-field recurrences were observed. For the entire cohort, the 10-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 71.1% and 87.1%, respectively. Univariate (UA) and multivariate (MA) analysis revealed extra-trunk primary lesion (MA) and multiple lesions (UA) as unfavorable prognostic factors. The 5-year RFS rate for patients with trunk lesion was 89.4% versus 66.9% for those with other location (p = 0.02). The 5-year RFS rates were 83.5 and 57.1% in case of single and multiple lesions (p = 0.04). An excellent survival can be achieved with definitive RT in indolent pcBCL. Patients with multiple and extra-trunk primary cutaneous lesions probably warrants intensification of therapy. Prospective studies are mandatory.


Subject(s)
Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone/radiotherapy , Lymphoma, Follicular/radiotherapy , Skin Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone/mortality , Lymphoma, Follicular/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Survival Rate
8.
Radiol Med ; 121(6): 515-20, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26706454

ABSTRACT

The increasing growth of population with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) such as Pacemaker (PM) and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators (ICD), requires particular attention in management of patients needing radiation treatment. This paper updates and summarizes some recommendations from different international guidelines. Ionizing radiation and/or electromagnetic interferences could cause device failure. Current approaches to treatment in patients who have these devices vary among radiation oncology centres. We refer to the German Society of Radiation Oncology and Cardiology guidelines (ed. 2015); to the Society of Cardiology Australia and New Zealand Statement (ed. 2015); to the guidelines in force in the Netherlands (ed. 2012) and to the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology recommendations (ed. 2013) as reported in the guidelines for the treatment of breast cancer in patients with CIED. Although there is not a clear cut-off point, risk of device failure increases with increasing doses. Cumulative dose and pacing dependency have been combined to categorize patients into low-, medium- and high-risk groups. Measures to secure patient safety are described for each category. The use of energy ≤6MV is preferable and it's strongly recommended not to exceed a total dose of 2 Gy to the PM and 1 Gy for ICD. Given the dangers of device malfunction, radiation oncology departments should adopt all the measures designed to minimize the risk to patients. For this reason, a close collaboration between cardiologist, radiotherapist and physicist is necessary.


Subject(s)
Defibrillators, Implantable , Pacemaker, Artificial , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Disease Management , Electromagnetic Phenomena , Equipment Failure , Humans , Patient Safety , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Factors , Risk Management
9.
Curr Opin Investig Drugs ; 10(12): 1334-45, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19943205

ABSTRACT

Angiogenesis is a complex, multistep process that is involved in the progression and prognosis of several types of cancer. In particular, it has been demonstrated that angiogenesis plays a central role in the progression of breast cancer. This review evaluates results from clinical trials in which the efficacy of conventional chemotherapeutic agents was compared with that of novel antiangiogenic compounds for the treatment of breast cancer, and provides a summary of trials that were ongoing at the time of publication in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings.


Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neovascularization, Pathologic/drug therapy , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/blood supply , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Clinical Trials as Topic , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Prognosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...