ABSTRACT
Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis is a serious complication of peritoneal dialysis and can occur even after transplant. The gut is partially or totally enveloped by a thick fibrous membrane that leads to the formation of multiple sections containing intestinal loops contracted and reduced in volume. Exacerbation after renal transplantation is a very rare but sometimes dramatic condition. We report a patient who developed intestinal obstruction due to encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis 1 year after a deceased-donor kidney transplant. Treatment included laparotomy, small-bowel lengthening by release of adhesions, and high doses of corticosteroids. The patient received immunosuppressive therapy with a combination of low-dose cyclosporine, everolimus, and prednisone, unchanged except for a temporary steroid increase in the postoperative period. We report success with this combined surgical plus medical therapy, with no recurrence after 81 months of follow-up.
Subject(s)
Calcineurin Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Cyclosporine/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Peritoneal Fibrosis/drug therapy , Sirolimus/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Drug Therapy, Combination , Everolimus , Female , Humans , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Kidney Transplantation , Peritoneal Dialysis , Peritoneal Fibrosis/complications , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Sirolimus/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Sirolimus (SRL) in combination with Cyclosporine A (CsA) and steroids has been shown to lower the incidence of acute renal allograft rejection episodes, allowing CsA sparing. We retrospectively compared the incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) among kidney transplant recipients (KTx) immunosuppressed with SRL + CsA versus CsA alone. Patients were divided into two groups: SRL + CsA (n = 38) versus CsA (n = 48). Mean follow-up was 53.9 +/- 17.1 months. Seventeen/86 subjects (19.8%) developed diabetes after transplantation (7 IFG, 8.1%; 10 PTDM, 11.6%). The incidence was significantly higher in SRL + CsA (12/38 patients, 31.6%) compared with CsA (5/43 patients, 10.4%) (P = .0144, odds ratio 3.97). More patients required treatment in the SRL + CsA compared to CsA alone cohort (13.2% vs 2.1%, P = .051): 4 pts (10.5%) became insulin- dependent among SRL+CsA, vs none in the CsA group. Use of OHD was similar in both groups (2.6% SRL + CsA vs 2.1% CsA). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex distribution, BMI, or serum creatinine at 1 to 3 and 5 years from transplantation. All PTDM patients are alive at follow-up, while two grafts were lost due to chronic renal allograft dysfunction. Within the limits of a small retrospective study, we observed that SRL in combination with CsA increased the diabetogenic potential of CsA. A possible explanation of our findings is that higher CsA doses were used in the early experience with SRL + CsA; therefore the higher incidence of PTDM that we observed in the SRL + CsA combination may be a sign of toxicity. Careful monitoring of blood levels is mandatory in the SRL + CsA combination to avoid pleiotropic toxicity.
