HLA-C antibodies are associated with irreversible rejection in kidney transplantation: Shared molecular eplets characterization.

We report an interesting case concerning an irreversible antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), associated with anti-HLA-C DSA, which occurred after a second kidney transplantation despite having determined a low number of antibodies directed against HLA-C antigens (MFI<1000) in the previous transplantation (which was then considered to be an indicator of low risk of AMR). A 63-year-old woman was re-transplanted with pre-transplant (PrT) sensitization. On day 7 post-transplantation, oligoanuria occurred and increased MFIs for the detected PrT antibodies and other antibodies (non-detected or detected with very low PrT MFI) were observed. SAB assay also showed antibodies against the second donor HLA-C mismatches and other HLA-C antigens. Nephrologists suspected AMR and the patient was therefore treated with methylprednisolone/plasmapheresis/IVIG/anti-CD20 without improvement, which led to transplantectomy. Histologic analysis confirmed acute AMR. Interestingly, it was possible to define exactly the potential immunizing epitopes whose recognition determines the specific antibody production. So, 1st donor DSAs (detected PrT with low MFI), 2nd donor DSAs (detected PTP), and non-DSA detected PTP have several shared eplets, being the 11AVR eplet the only one present on all alleles. Thus, the recognition of 11AVR eplet in the first transplant modeled the patient's antibody response. Therefore, we propose that donor HLA-C typing should always be performed for recipients with anti-HLA-C antibodies, and specific shared-eplets should be investigated in order to determine previous transplant mismatches.

KIR gene mismatching and KIR/C ligands in liver transplantation: consequences for short-term liver allograft injury.

BACKGROUND: Killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) bind human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class-I (HLA-I) ligands and regulate functions of natural killer cells and subsets of T cells. KIR/HLA-I interactions allow predicting natural killer cell alloreactivity in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and in HLA-compatible kidney transplants, but its meaning in liver transplantation remains controversial. METHODS: KIR and HLA genotypes were studied in 402 liver transplants, using sequence-specific oligonucleotides and primer methods. Recipients and donor KIRs, HLA-C genotypes, KIR gene mismatches (MMs) between recipient-donor pairs, and KIR/HLA-ligand combinations were analyzed in overall transplantations, in the acute rejection (AR; n=110) and non-AR (n=292) groups. RESULTS: KIR gene MMs between recipients and donors, mainly in activating KIRs, and KIR2DL3 and KIR2DS1 of recipients in the presence of donor C2 ligands, significantly enhanced early AR rate (P<0.05), with KIR2DL3 and KIR2DS1 exhibiting a synergic effect in dependence of the donor C2 ligand number (χ2=7.662, P=0.022). KIR2DL3, KIR2DS1, and also KIR2DS4 significantly influenced short-term graft survival, with a benefit for transplantations combining KIR2DL3 recipients and donors having C1 ligands (log rank, P<0.019 at 1 year; hazards ratio [HR], 0.321; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.107-0.962; P=0.042), whereas KIR2DS1 and KIR2DS4 recipients combined with donors lacking C1 ligands (C2/C2) exhibited a worse graft survival (log rank, P=0.035 at 6 months; HR, 7.713; 95% CI, 2.156-27.369; P=0.002 for KIR2DS1; and log rank, P=0.006 at 1 year; HR, 3.794; 95% CI, 1.267-11.365; P=0.017 for KIR2DS4). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that KIR gene-gene MMs increase AR and that KIRs/C ligands associated to AR and KIR2DS4/C ligands also influence short-term graft survival.

HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1 genes on susceptibility to and protection from allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is a hypersensitivity pulmonary disease that affects both patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and those with asthma. HLA-DRB1 alleles have previously been associated with ABPA-CF susceptibility; however, HLA-DQB1 allele associations have not been clearly established. The aim of the present study was to investigate HLA class II associations in patients with ABPA-CF and determine their roles in susceptibility or protection. Patients with ABPA-CF, patients with CF without ABPA, patients with asthma without ABPA (AST), and healthy controls were included in this study. DNA was extracted by automatic extractor. HLA-DRB1 and -DQB1 genotyping was performed by the Luminex PCR-SSOP method (One Lambda, Canoga Park, CA, USA). Allele specific PCR-SSP was also performed by high-resolution analysis (One Lambda). Statistical analysis was performed with SSPS and Arlequin software. Both HLA-DRB1*5:01 and -DRB1*11:04 alleles occurred with greater frequency in patients with ABPA-CF than in those with AST and CF and control subjects, corroborating previously published data. On the other hand, analysis of haplotypes revealed that almost all patients with ABPA-CF lacking DRB1*15:01 or DRB1*11:04 carry either DRB1*04, DRB1*11:01, or DRB1*07:01 alleles. In the HLA-DQB1 region, the HLA-DQB1*06:02 allele occurred more frequently in patients with ABPA-CF than in those with AST and CF and healthy controls, whereas HLA-DQB1*02:01 occurred less frequently in patients with ABPA-CF. These data confirm that there is a correlation between HLA-DRB1*15:01, -DRB1*11:04, DRB1*11:01, -DRB1*04 and -DRB1*07:01 alleles and ABPA-CF susceptibility and suggest that HLA-DQB1*02:01 is an ABPA-CF resistance allele.

Low median fluorescence intensity could be a nonsafety concept of immunologic risk evaluation in patients with shared molecular eplets in kidney transplantation.

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies are usually "epitope" and not "antigen" specific. This work presents an interesting case concerning Luminex median fluorescence intensity (MFI) levels in antibodies considered low risk (<1,000), but producing humoral rejection. These low-titer antibodies could play an important role in transplantation. A 42-year-old woman was retransplanted with a deceased donor with negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity cross-matching. Our patient was pretransplant (PrT) sensitized to HLA antigens (single antigens (SA) = 31%) for 1 previous transplant. Thus, the formerly detected sensitized antigens were A32, A30, A31, cross-reacting group 5C, and DQ3 with a MFI(max) ≈ 4,127. In the posttransplantation period (PTP), the patient exhibited important instability in renal function and we detected an increased SA percentage (61%) with MFI(max) = 15,029 (A*32) with other antigens (detected with a low PrT MFI [<1,000]) as anti-A*03 (MFI(max) = 13,301) and anti-A*11 (MFI(max) = 13,714) specificities. Anti-A*03 was a donor-specific antibody (DSA). Renal biopsy was compatible with humoral rejection. The patient was pulsed with methylprednisolone, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin without improvement. Thus, we added anti-CD20 and the initial clinical response was highly favorable. Biopsies resulted in suggestive rejection reversion. MFI A*03 DSA decreased to 6,908 and later to MFI(max) = 5,505. After a 6-month PTP, the patient is well with MFI(max) = 3,124. It was possible to define exactly the potential immunizing epitope eplets whose recognition determined the specific antibody production. A*32:01, A*30:01, A*31:01 (detected PrT), A*11:01, and A*03:01 (detected PTP) alleles have several shared eplets (62QE, 70AQS, and 76VGT), with 62QE being the only eplet present on all alleles. In conclusion, low MFI levels in antibodies considered low risk could be important in posttransplant humoral rejection, although the patient's renal function can be restored. Thus, specific shared eplets should always be investigated with respect to previous transplant mismatches.

Influence of human leukocyte antigen mismatching on rejection development and allograft survival in liver transplantation: is the relevance of HLA-A locus matching being underestimated?

The influence of HLA matching on liver transplant is still controversial, as studies have failed to demonstrate an adverse effect of HLA mismatching on transplant outcome. We examined the effect of HLA mismatching on transplant outcome in a series of 342 consecutive liver transplants (224 finally analyzed). HLA typing was performed by serological and molecular methods. HLA-A matching was associated with an increased chronic rejection incidence (P=0.04). Indeed, HLA-A match also demonstrated a significant impact on allograft survival (P=0.03), confirming previous observation concerning to rejection, as complete HLA-A mismatching favored a better liver transplant outcome. Analysis of HLA-A+B+DR matching also demonstrated a significant impact on graft survival (P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed the effect of HLA-A and DPB1 matching as independent risk factors for graft loss. Another independent factor was a positive pre-transplant crossmatch. In conclusion, liver transplant outcome has not been found to be improved by HLA matching, however a poorer HLA compatibility favored a better graft survival and decreased rejection incidence, with a special relevance for HLA-A matching.

Specific "intra-allele" and "intra-broad antigen" human leukocyte antigen alloantibodies in kidney graft transplantation.

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies are epitope specific and not antigen specific. This work presents a case of intra-allele (IA) sensitization. A 40-year-old-man underwent transplantion with identical "broad" DR. He was apparently not sensitized to HLA antigens by complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), with one previous transplantation 15 years previously. In post-transplantation monitoring, we detected an "intra-broad antigen" (IBA) anti-DRB1*13 DSA by Luminex. We performed post-transplantation B-cell cross-matching (CM) by CDC, this being completely negative. We detected allele-specific antibodies by single antigens (SA), anti-DRB1*1303 (IBA), -DQB1*0301 (IA), -DRB1*1101, -DRB3*0101, anti-DPB1*0202, and anti-DRB1*0103. These antibodies originated from the first transplantation, HLA-DR6+ homozygous and serologically broad matched, but retrospectively typed as DRB1*1401, *1303; DRB3*0101, *0202; DQB1*0301, *0503; DPB1*0401, *0202 (mismatches in italics). However the second donor was DRB1*1301, *1401 (DR6+ homozygous); DRB3*0202; DQB1*0603, *0503; DPB1*0401 (mismatches in italic). Therefore, the stronger antibodies generated in the first transplantion (anti-DRB1*1303 and -DQB1*0301) were not specific for the specific subtypes (DRB1*1301 and -DQB1*0603) on the second transplantation. Finally, it was possible to exactly define the potential immunizing epitopes the recognition of which determined antibody production. Therefore, our patient had low titers of pretransplantation IBA and IA antibodies that were not prospectively detected by CDC. Post-transplantation with Luminex, we detected these alloantibodies, but as they were not IA and IBA DSA, they did not cause allograft injury.

Association analysis of MICA gene polymorphism and MICA-129 dimorphism with inflammatory bowel disease susceptibility in a Spanish population.

MICA is located at 46 kb centromeric of HLA-B, is highly polymorphic and interactions with NKG2D, its receptor on the surface of NK, Tgammadelta, and T CD8 lymphocytes. A variation at amino acid position 129 of the alpha2-heavy chain domain seems to categorize MICA alleles into strong and weak binder of NKG2D receptor, and thereby to influence effector cell function. Our aim was to study allele polymorphism of MICA and the functionally relevant dimorphism (129val/met) of MICA gene in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients in our population. DNA was obtained from IBD patients (n = 88) and unrelated healthy Murcians (n = 154) and used to MICA genotyping using polymerase chain reaction-sequence-specific oligonucleotides. We did not find statistical differences in the distribution of MICA alleles between the IBD and control groups. However, we found a higher frequency of MICA-129met/met and a lower frequency of MICA-129val/met genotypes in IBD patients (mainly in ulcerative colitis) than in controls (pc = 0.02). These preliminary data could suggest a relevant role of MICA-129-val/met SNP (weak/strong binders of NKG2D receptor) in the pathogenesis of IBD.

Allelic diversity of MICA gene and MICA/HLA-B haplotypic variation in a population of the Murcia region in southeastern Spain.

Major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A (MICA) is located at 46 kb centromeric of HLA-B. It is highly polymorphic and interacts with NKG2D, its receptor on the surface of NK, Tgammadelta and T CD8 lymphocytes. Data on MICA polymorphism in different populations are still limited. Our aim was to establish allelic diversity of MICA gene and linkage disequilibrium with HLA-B in our population. DNA was obtained from 154 unrelated healthy individuals from the Murcia region in southeastern Spain. HLA-B genotyping was performed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes and allele-specific PCR-sequence-specific primers, and MICA genotyping by using PCR-sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes. A total of 19 MICA alleles were detected on this study. MICA*008 was the most frequent allele (25.3%), followed by MICA*002 (16.1%), MICA*004 (14.9%), MICA*001 (7.8%), MICA*009 and MICA*016 (7.1%), and MICA*010 (4.6%). Eleven alleles had frequencies of <1%. In the haplotype analysis, MICA*008-B*0702 was found to be the most common, followed by MICA*004-B*4403 and MICA*001-B*1801, MICA*002-B*3501, MICA*008-B*4402, MICA*004-B*4901, MICA*008-B*0801, and MICA*002-B*3801. The frequency of MICA*010-B*1501, MICA*008-B*1302, MICA*015-B*4501, and MICA*008-B*4001 was remarkable inasmuch as these two last haplotypes have not been reported in Spanish population. Indeed, MICA*016 linked to B*1402 has also not been reported in the literature. In conclusion, the allelic diversity in our population is similar to other Caucasian populations; however we found a series of less frequent alleles, in addition to as-yet-undescribed haplotypic associations in other populations of Caucasian origin.