ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Avaliar a liberação de íon fluoreto de 2 cimentos de ionômerode vidro (CIV) anidro e 2 modificados por resina composta antes e apósrecarga com fluoreto de sódio neutro a 2% por 4min. e após a proteçãoda superfície do CIV Maxxion R com um adesivo odontológico, umverniz cavitário e um esmalte incolor para unhas.Métodos: Com uma matriz de aço inox com 2mm x 6mm,confeccionou-se 5 corpos de prova de cada material, que foramimersos em 5mL de água deionizada, trocada a cada 24h. Foramrealizadas leituras em um potenciômetro nos dias 1, 2, 9 e 17 na 1ª e 2ªetapas, e as amostras foram tamponadas com solução TISAB III. Na 2ªetapa, as amostras foram submetidas à recarga e novamente imersasem 5mL de água deionizada. Na 3ª etapa foi realizada a proteção dasuperfície dos CIVs e feitas leituras nos 5min., 24h, 48h e 72h. Utilizouseos testes estatísticos Post Hoc de Tukey e t Student (p<0,05).Resultados: Observou-se diferença estatisticamente significante aocomparar a 1ª com a 2ª etapas em todos os materiais, exceto no dia 2para o Vidrion R e para o VitroFil LC. Na 3ª etapa observou-se que emtodos os materiais, comparando os primeiros 5 min. com os outrostempos, as diferenças entre as médias da liberação das concentraçõesde íon fluoreto foram estatisticamente significantes. Ao 0comparar osdemais tempos, tanto o verniz quanto o esmalte incolor para unhasapresentou diferença estatisticamente significante entre 24h e 48h,bem como em 24h e 72h.Conclusão: Os CIVs anidros tiveram maior efetividade na liberação deíon fluoreto e na recarga em comparação com os CIVs modificados porresina composta e o Maxxion R apresentou um comportamentohomogêneo e estatisticamente significante nas duas etapas. Todos osmateriais protetores testados foram eficazes, e o esmalte incolor paraunhas apresentou o melhor comportamento...
Objective: To evaluate fluoride ion release from two anhydrous glassionomer cements (GICs) and two resin-modified GICs (RMGICs) before and after recharge with 2% neutral sodium fluoride for 4 min and after surface protection of the Maxxion R GIC with an adhesive system, a cavity varnish and a colorless nail polish. Method: A stainless steel 2x6 mm matrix was used for fabricating 5 specimens of each material, which were immersed in 5 mL of deionized water, renewed every 24 h. Measurements with a potentiometer were performed on days 1, 2, 9 and 17, in the 1st and 2nd phases, and thespecimens were buffered with a TISAB III solution. In the 2nd phase, thespecimens were subjected to recharge and immersed again in 5 mL ofdeionized water. In the 3rd phase, the GIC surfaces were protected andreadings were made at 5 min, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. TukeyÆs post-hoc and StudentÆs t tests were used for statistical analyses (p<0.05). Results: There was statistically significant difference in the comparison between the 1st and 2nd phases for all materials, except at day 2 for Vidrion R and VitroFil LC. In the 3rd phase, it was observed that for all materials, comparison of the first 5 min with the other times revealedstatistically significant differences among the means of fluoride ionrelease. In the comparison with the other times, both the varnish and the colorless nail polish presented statistically significant differencebetween 24 and 48 h as well as between 24 and 72 h. Conclusion: The anhydrous GICs were more effective in fluoride ion release and recharge compared with the RMGICs. Maxxion R presented a homogeneous and statistically significant behavior in both phases. All materials for surface protection were efficient and the colorless nail polish had the best behavior...
Subject(s)
Humans , Glass Ionomer Cements/chemistry , Fluorides , Dental Materials , Potentiometry/methods , Composite Resins/chemistry , Data Interpretation, StatisticalABSTRACT
AIM: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of interdisciplinary work between dentistry and physiotherapy as well as to determine the temporomandibular disorders (TMD) patients' treatment plan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample consisted of 300 patient records from the ATM service (Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora) file. Three factors were analyzed: (1) Therapy, which were transcribed physical therapy modalities used; 2) If there were any guidelines or procedures for home exercises without the professionals presence; 3) the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) palpation pain rates, transferred to a pain level measurements table according to visual analog scale (VAS). The Chi-square test was applied for statistical analysis with a significance level p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: All physiotherapy modalities used separately or mixed contributed to TMJ pain relief. Guidelines for physical therapy at home proved to be very useful to pain decreasing. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary work in dentistry and physiotherapy treatments for TMD has been properly verified. It is essential to have an interdisciplinary treatment plan, where the physical therapy helps the pain relief and dentistry treats the disorders related to the stomatognathic system. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The interdisciplinary work between dentistry and physiotherapy is more effective in TMD treatment.
