Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis ; 13(4): 237-42, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23421881

ABSTRACT

This study compared 4 protocols for DNA extraction from homogenates of 6 different organs of cows infected with the Brucella abortus 2308 strain. The extraction protocols compared were as follows: GT (guanidine isothiocyanate lysis), Boom (GT lysis with the carrying suspension diatomaceous earth), PK (proteinase K lysis), and Santos (lysis by boiling and freezing with liquid nitrogen). Positive and negative gold standard reference groups were generated by classical bacteriological methods. All samples were processed with the 4 DNA extraction protocols and amplified with the B4 and B5 primers. The number of positive samples in the placental cotyledons was higher than that in the other organs. The cumulated results showed that the Santos protocol was more sensitive than the Boom (p=0.003) and GT (p=0.0506) methods and was similar to the PK method (p=0.2969). All of the DNA extraction protocols resulted in false-negative results for PCR. In conclusion, despite the disadvantages of classical bacteriological methods, the best approach for direct diagnosis of B. abortus in organs of infected cows includes the isolation associated with PCR of DNA extracted from the cotyledon by the Santos or PK methods.


Subject(s)
Brucella abortus/isolation & purification , Brucellosis/veterinary , DNA, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Animals , Brucella abortus/genetics , Brucellosis/microbiology , Cattle , DNA Primers/genetics , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Female , Liver/microbiology , Lymph Nodes/microbiology , Mammary Glands, Animal/microbiology , Milk/microbiology , Placenta/microbiology , Pregnancy , Spleen/microbiology
2.
Arq. bras. med. vet. zootec ; 63(6): 1591-1594, dez. 2011. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-608989

ABSTRACT

O objetivo do estudo foi adaptar e avaliar a PCR para detecção de Brucella ovis e comparar os resultados com aqueles obtidos por cultivo microbiológico do sêmen, urina e dos órgãos de carneiros infectados experimentalmente. Dos 31 animais infectados experimentalmente, amostras de PCR do sêmen apresentaram maior sensibilidade (21,6 por cento) do que o cultivo (8,0 por cento). Em amostras de urina, a sensibilidade das técnicas foi semelhante (10,1 por cento para a cultivo e 12,7 por cento para PCR). PCR detectou a presença do agente em 21,5 por cento das amostras testadas, enquanto os órgãos de cultivo detectaram em apenas 3,3 por cento das amostras. PCR detectou um maior número de amostras positivas do que o cultivo microbiológico.

3.
Vet Rec ; 167(3): 96-9, 2010 Jul 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20643887

ABSTRACT

The performance of a serum PCR assay was compared with that of a blood PCR assay for the diagnosis of canine brucellosis caused by Brucella canis in 72 dogs. The dogs were classified into three groups (infected, non-infected and suspected brucellosis) according to the results of blood culture and serological tests. The sensitivities of blood PCR and serum PCR were, respectively, 97.14 per cent and 25.71 per cent. The specificities of both were 100 per cent. In the group of dogs with suspected brucellosis, three were positive by blood PCR and none was positive by serum PCR. Serum PCR showed little value for the direct diagnosis of canine brucellosis as the assay had low diagnostic sensitivity and fewer positive dogs were detected by this test than by blood culture, blood PCR, rapid slide agglutination test (RSAT) and RSAT with 2-mercaptoethanol.


Subject(s)
Brucella canis/isolation & purification , Brucellosis/veterinary , Dog Diseases/diagnosis , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Agglutination Tests/methods , Agglutination Tests/veterinary , Animals , Brucella canis/genetics , Brucellosis/blood , Brucellosis/diagnosis , Dog Diseases/blood , Dogs , Female , Male , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Serum/microbiology
4.
Arq. bras. med. vet. zootec ; 59(6): 1583-1585, dez. 2007.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-476136

ABSTRACT

Brucella abortus infection is reported in a dog from a rural area that presented at clinical evaluation left testicular enlargement and right testicular decrease. Serum resulted negative to rapid agglutination test and agar gel immunodifusion with Brucella ovis antigen but positive to buffered plate agglutination test, tube agglutination test and 2- Mercapthoetanol with B. abortus antigen. Brucella isolation was negative in blood, testicular material, semen and urine. Brucella DNA was detected in PCR from urine and blood


Subject(s)
Animals , Dogs , Brucellosis/epidemiology , Brucellosis/veterinary , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/veterinary , Mononuclear Phagocyte System/microbiology , Biopsy, Fine-Needle/methods , Biopsy, Fine-Needle/veterinary , Agglutination Tests/methods , Agglutination Tests/veterinary
5.
Theriogenology ; 68(9): 1260-70, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17920673

ABSTRACT

A PCR assay for the detection of Brucella canis in canine vaginal swab samples was evaluated, comparing its performance with that of bacterial isolation, serological tests, and a blood PCR assay. One hundred and forty-four female dogs were clinically examined to detect reproductive problems and they were tested by the rapid slide agglutination test, with and without 2-mercaptoethanol (2ME-RSAT and RSAT, respectively). In addition, microbiological culture and PCR were performed on blood and vaginal swab samples. The results of the vaginal swab PCR were compared to those of the other tests using the Kappa coefficient and McNemar test. Of the 144 females that were examined, 66 (45.8%) were RSAT positive, 23 (15.9%) were 2ME-RSAT positive, 49 (34.02%) were blood culture positive, 6 (4.1%) were vaginal swab culture positive, 54 (37.5%) were blood PCR positive, 52 (36.2%) were vaginal swab PCR positive, and 50.69% (73/144) were positive by the combined PCR. The PCR was able to detect as few as 3.8 fg of B. canis DNA experimentally diluted in 54 ng of canine DNA, extracted from vaginal swab samples of non-infected bitches. In addition, the PCR assay amplified B. canis genetic sequences from vaginal swab samples containing 1.0 x 10(0) cfu/mL. In conclusion, vaginal swab PCR was a good candidate as a confirmatory test for brucellosis diagnosis in bitches suspected to be infected, especially those negative on blood culture or blood PCR; these animals may be important reservoirs of infection and could complicate attempts to eradicate the disease in confined populations.


Subject(s)
Brucella canis/isolation & purification , Brucellosis/veterinary , Dog Diseases/diagnosis , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Vagina/microbiology , Animals , Brucella canis/genetics , Brucellosis/diagnosis , DNA Primers/chemistry , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , DNA, Bacterial/blood , DNA, Ribosomal Spacer/genetics , Dog Diseases/microbiology , Dogs , Estrous Cycle/physiology , Female , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Vaginal Discharge/microbiology , Vaginal Discharge/veterinary
6.
Theriogenology ; 67(7): 1203-10, 2007 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17343907

ABSTRACT

The objective was to evaluate a PCR assay for the detection of Brucella canis in canine semen, comparing its performance with that of bacterial isolation, serological tests and PCR assay of blood. Fifty-two male dogs were examined clinically to detect reproductive abnormalities and their serum was tested by the rapid slide agglutination test, with and without 2-mercaptoethanol (2ME-RSAT and RSAT, respectively). In addition, microbiological culture and PCR assays were performed on blood and semen samples. The findings of the semen PCR were compared (Kappa coefficient and McNemar test) to those of blood PCR, culture of blood and semen, RSAT, and 2ME-RSAT. Nucleic acid extracts from semen collected from dogs not infected with B. canis were spiked with decreasing amounts of B. canis RM6/66 DNA and the resulting samples subjected to PCR. In addition, semen samples of non-infected dogs were spiked with decreasing amounts of B. canis CFU and the resulting suspensions were used for DNA extraction and amplification. Of the 52 dogs that were examined, the following tests were positive: RSAT, 16 (30.7%); 2ME-RSAT, 5 (9.6%); blood culture, 14 (26.9%); semen culture, 11 (21.1%); blood PCR, 18 (34.6%); semen PCR, 18 (34.6%). The PCR assay detected as few as 3.8 fg of B. canis DNA experimentally diluted in 444.9 ng of canine DNA (extracted from semen samples of non-infected dogs). In addition, the PCR assay amplified B. canis genetic sequences from semen samples containing as little as 1.0 x 10(0) cfu/mL. We concluded that PCR assay of semen was a good candidate as a confirmatory test for the diagnosis of brucellosis in dogs; its diagnostic performance was similar to blood culture or blood PCR. Furthermore, the PCR assay of semen was more sensitive than the 2ME-RSAT or semen culture. Examination of semen by PCR should be included for diagnosis of brucellosis prior to natural mating or AI; in that regard, some dogs that were negative on serological and microbiological examinations as well as blood PCR were positive on PCR of semen.


Subject(s)
Brucella canis/isolation & purification , Brucellosis/veterinary , Dog Diseases/microbiology , Semen/microbiology , Agglutination Tests/veterinary , Animals , Brucella canis/genetics , Brucellosis/diagnosis , Brucellosis/microbiology , DNA, Bacterial/chemistry , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Dog Diseases/diagnosis , Dogs , Male , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Sensitivity and Specificity
7.
Vet Res Commun ; 31(8): 951-65, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17308888

ABSTRACT

A pair of primers directed to 16S-23S rDNA interspacer (ITS) was designed directed to Brucella genetic sequences in order to develop a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) putatively capable of amplifying DNA from any Brucella species. Nucleic acid extracts from whole-blood from naive dogs were spiked with decreasing amounts of Brucella canis RM6/66 DNA and the resulting solutions were tested by PCR. In addition, the ability of PCR to amplify Brucella spp. genetic sequences from naturally infected dogs was evaluated using 210 whole-blood samples of dogs from 19 kennels. The whole-blood samples collected were subjected to blood culture and PCR. Serodiagnosis was performed using the rapid slide agglutination test with and without 2-mercaptoethanol. The DNA from whole blood was extracted using proteinase-K, sodium dodecyl sulphate and cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide followed by phenol-chloroform purification. The PCR was capable of detecting as little as 3.8 fg of Brucella DNA mixed with 450 ng of host DNA. Theoretically, 3.8 fg of Brucella DNA represents the total genomic mass of fewer than two bacterial cells. The PCR diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 100%. From the results observed in the present study, we conclude that PCR could be used as confirmatory test for diagnosis of B. canis infection.


Subject(s)
Brucella canis/isolation & purification , Brucellosis/veterinary , DNA, Ribosomal Spacer/genetics , Dog Diseases/microbiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Agglutination Tests/veterinary , Animals , Brucella canis/genetics , Brucellosis/diagnosis , Brucellosis/microbiology , DNA, Bacterial/chemistry , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA, Ribosomal Spacer/chemistry , Dog Diseases/diagnosis , Dogs , Female , Male , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...