[Is environmental health the future of public health?]. / La santé environnementale est-elle l'avenir de la santé publique ?

In France, the field of public health and public health training have developed over recent decades in parallel to the emergence of environmental health; however, these two fields are grounded in conceptual and methodological underpinnings that often differ. The authors of this article try to analyse the differences between these two approaches which both have prevention as their main purpose. Both approaches use epidemiology as a tool, but they are distinguished by their uniquely different definitions of environment. Unifying both approaches around a common basis is possible, but in order to do this, public health must evolve to expand and integrate new disciplines other than epidemiology. Supported by its close ties to societal issues of concern and recent scientific developments, the environmental health boom can and should revive public health values and contribute to the development of public health training in France.

Rationales, design and recruitment for the Elfe longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: Many factors act simultaneously in childhood to influence health status, life chances and well being, including pre-birth influences, the environmental pollutants of early life, health status but also the social influences of family and school. A cohort study is needed to disentangle these influences and explore attribution. METHODS: Elfe will be a nationally representative cohort of 20 000 children followed from birth to adulthood using a multidisciplinary approach. The cohort will be based on the INSEE Permanent Demographic Panel (EDP) established using census data and civil records. The sample size has been defined in order to match the representativeness criteria and to obtain some prevalence estimation, but also to address the research area of low exposure/rare effects. The cohort will be based on repeated surveys by face to face or phone interview (at birth and each year) as well as medical interview (at 2 years) and examination (at 6 years). Furthermore, biological samples will be taken at birth to evaluate the foetal exposition to toxic substances, environmental sensors will be placed in the child's homes. Pilot studies have been initiated in 2007 (500 children) with an overall acceptance rate of 55% and are currently under progress, the 2-year survey being carried out in October this year. DISCUSSION: The longitudinal study will provide a unique source of data to analyse the development of children in their environment, to study the various factors interacting throughout the life course up to adulthood and to determine the impact of childhood experience on the individual's physical, psychological, social and professional development.

The environmental health of children: priorities in Europe.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate existing research on the environmental health of children and provide a prioritised list of risk factors and policy recommendations for action, the Policy Interpretation Network on Children's Health and Environment (PINCHE) was set up within EU FP5 (QLK4-2002-02395). The project focused on air pollutants, carcinogens, neurotoxicants and noise. PINCHE was a multidisciplinary and multinational network of representatives from science, industry, NGOs, and consumer and patient organisations in Europe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed using the Pubmed, Embase and Toxline databases. The quality of the gathered articles was assessed and their information and relevance was interpreted within a systematic framework. Information related to exposure, epidemiology, and toxicology was analysed separately and then a risk evaluation of particular environmental factors was made. Socioeconomic factors were specifically taken into account. The results were compiled, and considering the present regulatory situation, policy recommendations for action were made. Finally, the risk factors and policy recommendations were prioritised through a process of discussion between all the partners. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: PINCHE concluded that outdoor air pollutants (especially traffic-related), environmental tobacco smoke, allergens, and mercury were high priorities with an urgent need for action. Brominated flame retardants, lead, PCBs and dioxins, ionising and solar radiation, and some noise sources were classified as being of medium priority. Some toxins were given low priority, based on few exposed children, relatively mild health effects or an improving situation due to past policy measures. We recognise the shortcomings of such a prioritisation and, though some measures are more urgent than others, emphasise that ideally all policy measures should be carried out without delay for all toxins. This priority list must be continuously revised, the precautionary principle should be central to all decisions, and the focus should be on safe exposure levels for children.

Today's epidemics in children: possible relations to environmental pollution and suggested preventive measures.

BACKGROUND: Facts and hypotheses on the relationship between some children's diseases or disorders and external stressors during the developmental stage of a child, both prenatally and postnatally are described in literature. In this paper the following changes in patterns and causes of the main childhood illnesses are summarized and recommendations for actions are made. Prematurity. Intra-uterine growth restriction. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome. Type I and Type II diabetes. Asthma, atopy and hay fever. Autism. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Learning disabilities. Cancer. Obesity. Hearing problems. RESULTS: Literature provides a growing amount of information on changing patterns in childhood diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The following recommendations for action are formulated: Immediate research on endocrine disrupters in relation to prematurity. Diabetes: avoid Maillard Compounds in liquid baby food and in food in general: promote breastfeeding. Asthma: avoid exposure to smoking, the use of chemical household products, dioxin and dioxin-like chemicals, and avoid air pollution with high levels of particulate matter, especially around conception, during pregnancy and in the first years of life. Autism: more research on incidence and causes. ADHD and learning disabilities: more research on prevalence and causes. Preventions: 1) preconception counselling to avoid potentially harmful substances; 2) controlling and further lowering levels of polychlorinated biphenyls, lead and methyl mercury. Cancer: promote breastfeeding, carry out research into effects of foetal exposure to internal fission-product radionuclides. Obesity: stop smoking in pregnancy, avoid parental obesity, longer night sleep. Hearing problems: lower noise levels in discothèques, promote the day-evening-night level to avoid noise (longer night sleep).

Exposure to multiple environmental agents and their effect.

INTRODUCTION: All children are exposed to multiple physical, chemical and biological challenges that can result in adverse health effects before and after birth. In this context, the danger of multiple exposures cannot be assessed from a single-chemical approach as used in classical toxicology. AIM: To open up a 'negotiation space' for the problem of multiple exposure to environmental stressors, defined as any physical, chemical or biological entity that can induce an adverse response. In this context, two further questions obtain: to what extent can synergistic risks be assessed, and how far could potential adverse effects be prevented by enhanced regulation? METHODS: A discussion of two general approaches is taken: 1) the investigation of mixtures such as smoking or air pollution without specifying the individual agents, and 2) the investigation of individual substances with a focus on possible interactions in the context of dose to receptor. RESULTS: Although mixtures of compounds can have effects, it may not be possible to ascribe causation to a single compound. Furthermore, cumulative low-dose insult can, in some circumstances, be more toxic than a single high-dose exposure, e.g. endocrine disruptive effects of a combination of PCBs and dioxins which disrupt the thyroid hormone status; this tends to contradict elements of classical toxicology, . These cumulative insults may further combine with heavy metals and can disrupt the heme synthesis. It is possible that groups of pollutants could be used to test their cumulative capacity to multiple stress-susceptible receptor targets as is done in smoking and air pollution. This methodology could be used for further groups of potential pollutants, for example those associated with cleaning products, or cosmetics. Testing individual substances with a focus on interactions means that not only chemicals but also concurrent diseases should be taken into account. We suggest that the enhanced regulation of potential multiple stressors falls into two discrete categories. The first comprises a more precautionary approach (as demonstrated by the banning of chemicals such as some brominated flame retardants in Europe). The second comprises a more 'permissive' liberal approach involving the initial study of an individual compound, and subsequent interrogation of that compound in combination with another (as demonstrated by lowering the carcinogenicity of aflatoxin by vaccination against hepatitis B). CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to define and study groups of multiple stressors as in US EPA's Framework for Cumulative Risk Assessment (U.S. EPA 2003). Recent increased knowledge of the greater sensitivity of the unborn baby, the infant and the child, has led to general recognition that a higher degree of precaution is now needed in regulating for multiple stressors on the young. The more liberal permissive approach proceeding from established effects of the individual exposures is becoming less acceptable now that we know that there is much we do not understand about chronic effects of stressors during the early development phases. Conflicts over which approach to take may have to be resolved through engagement and negotiation with a wide community of stakeholders. This "community of interest" may include fundamental research scientists, practicing clinical paediatricians, patient groups, and others concerned with the health and wellbeing of infants and children.

[The practitioner's role in surveillance and information on environmental risks]. / Surveillance et information sur les risques environnementaux: le rôle du praticien.

Health scares have entailed an increasing concern about environmental risks for populations. Authorities' response was to set up a system for the analysis, surveillance and management of environmental risks. Practitioners have an important role to play in this system, as primary actors of surveillance and as a close source of information about the environmental risks for the population. Three examples are developed. Children's lead poisoning still exists and entails irreversible neuropsychic deficits. Its diagnosis rests upon the recognition of risk factors and the prescription of a test of blood lead level. Carbon monoxide poisoning is the first cause of mortality by acute poisoning in France and it causes several thousand hospitalizations every year. Notification of the cases of lead and carbon monoxide poisonings is indispensable to remove their causes. Links between cancer and environment are an important social concern and a public health issue. Practitioners have a key role to play not only in the communication on this subject, but also to notify disturbing sanitary events and participate in the local investigations.

[The heat wave of August 2003: what happened?]. / La vague de chaleur d'août 2003: que s'est-il passe?

A heat wave of exceptional intensity occurred in France in August 2003, 2003 was the warmest of the last 53 years in terms of minimal, maximal and average temperatures, and in terms of duration. In addition, high temperatures and sunshine, causing the emission of pollutants, significantly increased the atmospheric ozone level. Some epidemiological studies were rapidly implemented during the month of August in order to asses the health impact of this heat wave. Excess mortality was estimated at about 14 800 additional deaths. This is equivalent to a total mortality increase of 60% between August 1st and 20th, 2003 (Inserm survey). Almost the whole country was concerned by this excess-mortality, even in locations where the number of very hot days remained low. Excess-mortality clearly increased with the duration of extreme temperatures. These studies also described the features of heat-related deaths. They showed that the death toll was at its highest among seniors and suggested that less autonomous or disabled or mentally ill people were more vulnerable. So, they provided essential information for the setting up of an early warning system in conjunction with emergency departments. The public health impact of the Summer 2003 heat wave in various European countries was also assessed. Different heat waves in term of intensity had occurred at different times in many countries with each time deaths in excess. But, it does seem that France was the most affected country. However, implementation of standardized methods of data collection through all countries is necessary to afford further comparisons. Collaborative studies will be conducted in this way. After theses first descriptive studies, further etiologic studies on risk factors and heat-related deaths were launched and are now in progress. Considering the health impact of the heat wave, national health authorities decided to launch an Heat Wave National Plan including a provisional Heat Watch Warning System (HWWS) for 2004. Developed in collaboration with Metéo France, this HWWS is based upon an analysis of historical daily mortality data and meteorological indicators in 14 French cities in order to define the best indicators and triggers. The public health impact of the heat wave of August 2003 was major. This exceptional event raises questions about anticipating phenomena which are difficult to predict. The collaborative efforts which were developed and the group of actions and studies which were implemented in a context of emergency are now useful for the setting up of early warning strategies and thus efficient prevention.