Changes in suicide-related tweets before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in France: The importance of social media monitoring in public health prediction.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted mental health, as demonstrated by numerous studies. In recent years, especially during the pandemic, the use of social networks, including Twitter, increased. This suggests that this media could help with mental health monitoring, as attested by previous studies. METHOD: We conducted a multidisciplinary study on French tweets that were posted between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021. We selected the tweets via the Twitter API (Application Programming Interface) using five keywords relating to suicide: want to die, suicidal ideation, commit suicide, suicidal, and suicide attempt. A word frequency analysis was performed, and the data were compared with the number of emergency visits for suicidal ideation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic as recorded by the French national suicide observatory. RESULTS: We observed that 189,005 tweets were related to suicide in 2019, 261,993 in 2020 (+38.62% of that observed in 2019), and 301,177 in 2021 (+59.35% of that observed in 2019). We also observed an increase in the number of tweets containing control words in 2020 (+30.07% of that observed in 2019), but in 2021, the number almost fell back to the level of that in 2019 (+5.96% of that observed in 2019). Furthermore, the difference between both ratios (of suicide-related tweets and of tweets containing control words) was most significant during the third lockdown. The change in the number of suicide-related tweets followed a curve that overlapped with the change in the number of emergency visits following suicidal ideations, as reported by the French national suicide observatory. In conclusion, Twitter can be an adequate and reliable tool for screening for suicidal ideation in the general population.

Naftazone in advanced Parkinson's disease: An acute L-DOPA challenge randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: There is an unmet need to better control motor complications in Parkinson's disease (PD). Naftazone, which exhibits glutamate release inhibition properties, has shown antiparkinsonian and antidyskinetic activity in preclinical models of PD and in a clinical proof of concept study. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled cross-over trial in PD patients with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia testing naftazone 160 mg/day versus placebo for 14 days. The two co-primary endpoints were the area under curve (AUC) of motor (MDS-UPDRS part III) and dyskinesia (AIMS) scores during an acute levodopa challenge performed at the end of each period. Secondary endpoints were UDysRS and axial symptoms scores during the challenge; AIMS, UDysRS, and time spent with or without dyskinesia the day before the challenge. The primary analysis was performed in the per protocol population. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included in the analysis. There was no difference between naftazone and placebo for the AUC of MDS-UPDRS III (-89, 95%CI[-1071; 893], p = 0.85), and AIMS (70, 95%CI[-192; 332], p = 0.57). At the end of treatment periods, AIMS score tended to be lower with naftazone than placebo (4.4 ±â€¯3.4 versus 6.7 ±â€¯4.4, p = 0.07), but UDysRS scores and other secondary outcomes were not different. Naftazone was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not confirm previous results on the efficacy of naftazone on dyskinesia nor motor fluctuations highlighting the problem of translating results obtained in preclinical models into clinical trials. Further investigation of naftazone may be conducted in PD with longer treatment duration.

Withdrawing amantadine in dyskinetic patients with Parkinson disease: the AMANDYSK trial.

OBJECTIVE: The AMANDYSK trial was designed to assess long-term efficacy of chronic treatment with amantadine in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID). METHODS: This was a 3-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, wash-out study conducted in 57 amantadine-treated (≥200 mg/d for ≥6 months) dyskinetic patients with PD. The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline in a Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) dyskinesia subscore (items 32 [duration] + 33 [severity]). Secondary outcomes included other LID measurements ("responders" analysis, premature dropout for LID, Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale). Exploratory outcomes included time with troublesome dyskinesia as measured by diaries, UPDRS Motor Examination (part III) for motor symptoms of PD, and fatigue and apathy scores for nonmotor symptoms. RESULTS: UPDRS items 32 + 33 deteriorated more in patients switched to placebo ("discontinuing" group) (+1.7 ± 2.0 units; 95% confidence interval 0.9, 2.4) as compared with those maintained on amantadine ("continuing" group) (+0.2 ± 1.5 units; 95% confidence interval -0.4, 0.8; p = 0.003). Secondary outcomes confirmed this difference because there were significantly more responders, more dropouts for LID, greater increase in "ON" time with troublesome dyskinesia, and greater worsening of Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale score in the discontinuing group. There were no between-group differences in the UPDRS Motor Examination, whereas apathy (as measured by caregivers) and fatigue scores tended to worsen more in patients randomized to placebo. CONCLUSION: Wash-out of amantadine in dyskinetic patients with PD significantly worsened LID. No significant effect was observed on motor parkinsonian symptoms, while exploratory outcomes suggested that amantadine might improve apathy and fatigue in such patients. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This article provides Class II evidence that in patients with PD, withdrawing amantadine significantly aggravates LID in a median time of 7 days.